Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s insulting to intelligent people that you post a daily caller article, which is laughable on its own, but they strut around proudly claiming it vindicates Flynn.
Look. America heard from you Gadsen flag license plate, coalrolling , obese electric wheelchair, vape enthusiast, Qanon types for the last 4 years. We’re done. We’re over your fake news and poorly informed opinions not even worthy of energy it takes for a response. Just please go away and be relegated to the corners of American irrelevancy. Find new habits. It’s just too much.
I know it’s hard to accept you were lied to.
Anonymous wrote:It’s insulting to intelligent people that you post a daily caller article, which is laughable on its own, but they strut around proudly claiming it vindicates Flynn.
Look. America heard from you Gadsen flag license plate, coalrolling , obese electric wheelchair, vape enthusiast, Qanon types for the last 4 years. We’re done. We’re over your fake news and poorly informed opinions not even worthy of energy it takes for a response. Just please go away and be relegated to the corners of American irrelevancy. Find new habits. It’s just too much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://dailycaller.com/2020/05/20/christopher-steele-michael-flynn-svetlana-lokhova-cambridge/
1. Inadvertently reveals that the FBI had another source corroborate Steele’s assertion that Flynn had an affair with Svetlana Lokhova.
2. Posted an exclusive picture of Flynn courtesy of.... Svetlana Lokhova.
Where does it say this?
Read the article. It is pretty plainly written and suggests multiple sources for this "rumor."
And, those "sources" are circular in nature.....
Please cite the parts that there are multiple sources.
There is a source, and a second source. Two sources.
Anonymous wrote:
Seems as if CNN and conspiracy theorist Eric Garland are trying mightily to distract from another important story that broke today.
This story will go the same route as the alfabank story - which means it will be found to be totally false.
Anonymous wrote:
OMG, no you are wrong. They used the dates in the false handwritten notes to justify a narrative that was false, based on the (false) timeline. It was material to their claim.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am betting that the pp who believes the additions were on the tab flaps is exactly right. And, they were added by the defense to make reference back to other evidence... possibly texts.
The dates both have the same border around them. I think this is intentional to indicate to the court that these were defense notes - not written on the document, but on the tab. Remember these are photocopies of the evidence and if the tab flaps have been dated by the defense team, they are not "altering evidence."
Strzok has gotten his knickers in a bunch about nothing and is probably making a big deal about this to distract the public from the other evidence. Mission accomplished, at least temporarily.
And..... I was right.