Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about this: In what ways is DC United Academy better than its peers? Please provide objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics.
You're bringing claims and accusations.
When asked to satisfy burden of proof, you want the accused side to support a case they haven't brought?
LOL
Your silliness knows no end. Now faux legalese. The question has always been "strong academy or not?" Lots of "measurable" info on "not." Just looking for the other side.
Then provide all the "performing better" objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics?
But start by listing the criterion academy performance is based on
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From a small graduating class last year the academy sent 12 kids to good colleges with 4 being Ivy league
Sounds like a heck of a positive to me
And as was stated over and over... if college is the end goal, DCU is perfectly fine. As is any MLS Next or ECNL club.
All MLS Academies are fine for college because there are far more players, the overwhelming vast majority, that are leaving MLS Club Academies and going to College than going to top tier professional clubs.
Unless you have secret information no one else does
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From a small graduating class last year the academy sent 12 kids to good colleges with 4 being Ivy league
Sounds like a heck of a positive to me
And as was stated over and over... if college is the end goal, DCU is perfectly fine. As is any MLS Next or ECNL club.
Anonymous wrote:From a small graduating class last year the academy sent 12 kids to good colleges with 4 being Ivy league
Sounds like a heck of a positive to me
Anonymous wrote:From a small graduating class last year the academy sent 12 kids to good colleges with 4 being Ivy league
Sounds like a heck of a positive to me
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about this: In what ways is DC United Academy better than its peers? Please provide objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics.
You're bringing claims and accusations.
When asked to satisfy burden of proof, you want the accused side to support a case they haven't brought?
LOL
Your silliness knows no end. Now faux legalese. The question has always been "strong academy or not?" Lots of "measurable" info on "not." Just looking for the other side.
Then provide all the "performing better" objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics?
But start by listing the criterion academy performance is based on
This is a DCU bashing thread spearheaded by an obsessed individual that can't handle rejection who has recruited a couple other Sad Sack losers who are wallowing in their insecurities.
Its not an intellectual discussion on the pros and cons of the region's MLS Club professional academy.
They made biased accusations that can't be proved. That's on them.
Whatever the status of the dcu academy, it has nothing to do with 99.85% of the people here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about this: In what ways is DC United Academy better than its peers? Please provide objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics.
You're bringing claims and accusations.
When asked to satisfy burden of proof, you want the accused side to support a case they haven't brought?
LOL
Your silliness knows no end. Now faux legalese. The question has always been "strong academy or not?" Lots of "measurable" info on "not." Just looking for the other side.
Then provide all the "performing better" objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics?
But start by listing the criterion academy performance is based on
You're just going in circles, ignoring actual facts, attacking posters and trying to reframe the question. Let's keep it simple. Do you think DCU Academy is a strong academy? If so, why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about this: In what ways is DC United Academy better than its peers? Please provide objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics.
You're bringing claims and accusations.
When asked to satisfy burden of proof, you want the accused side to support a case they haven't brought?
LOL
Your silliness knows no end. Now faux legalese. The question has always been "strong academy or not?" Lots of "measurable" info on "not." Just looking for the other side.
Then provide all the "performing better" objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics?
But start by listing the criterion academy performance is based on
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about this: In what ways is DC United Academy better than its peers? Please provide objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics.
You're bringing claims and accusations.
When asked to satisfy burden of proof, you want the accused side to support a case they haven't brought?
LOL
Your silliness knows no end. Now faux legalese. The question has always been "strong academy or not?" Lots of "measurable" info on "not." Just looking for the other side.
Then provide all the "performing better" objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics?
But start by listing the criterion academy performance is based on
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about this: In what ways is DC United Academy better than its peers? Please provide objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics.
You're bringing claims and accusations.
When asked to satisfy burden of proof, you want the accused side to support a case they haven't brought?
LOL
Your silliness knows no end. Now faux legalese. The question has always been "strong academy or not?" Lots of "measurable" info on "not." Just looking for the other side.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about this: In what ways is DC United Academy better than its peers? Please provide objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics.
You're bringing claims and accusations.
When asked to satisfy burden of proof, you want the accused side to support a case they haven't brought?
LOL
Your silliness knows no end. Now faux legalese. The question has always been "strong academy or not?" Lots of "measurable" info on "not." Just looking for the other side.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about this: In what ways is DC United Academy better than its peers? Please provide objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics.
You're bringing claims and accusations.
When asked to satisfy burden of proof, you want the accused side to support a case they haven't brought?
LOL
Anonymous wrote:How about this: In what ways is DC United Academy better than its peers? Please provide objectively measurable criteria, data, stats and metrics.