Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The GOP said it wanted open hearings.
Now they will get them.
Good.
And, the American voters can see just how unfair this process really is. Just wait.
Anonymous wrote:The GOP said it wanted open hearings.
Now they will get them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Judge Nepoliano defends the House and the Impeachment process on Fox News: https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1189864739041693696
Schiff is neither independent nor an investigator.
So is the GOP stance that impeachment is only legitimate if it is conducted completely by members of the same party as the President?
Not at all.
The last two impeachments were conducted in a much more fair and equitable manner. Schiff is conflicted. He lied about the WB contacting his office. He should not be in charge of this farce.
Dude. The last two impeachments were investigated by the DOJ before evidence was turned over to the House. AG Barr refused to open investigations after receiving TWO CRIMINAL REFERRALS.
Stop blaming the House. Barr had an opportunity to let DOJ manage the investigation and he refused. That is corruption.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Judge Nepoliano defends the House and the Impeachment process on Fox News: https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1189864739041693696
Schiff is neither independent nor an investigator.
So is the GOP stance that impeachment is only legitimate if it is conducted completely by members of the same party as the President?
Not at all.
The last two impeachments were conducted in a much more fair and equitable manner. Schiff is conflicted. He lied about the WB contacting his office. He should not be in charge of this farce.
Dude. The last two impeachments were investigated by the DOJ before evidence was turned over to the House. AG Barr refused to open investigations after receiving TWO CRIMINAL REFERRALS.
Stop blaming the House. Barr had an opportunity to let DOJ manage the investigation and he refused. That is corruption.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Senators who sign a resolution against impeachment will be rewarded with cash from Trump’s https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/31/trump-impeachment-senators-donor-062084
Outright bribary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Judge Nepoliano defends the House and the Impeachment process on Fox News: https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1189864739041693696
Schiff is neither independent nor an investigator.
So is the GOP stance that impeachment is only legitimate if it is conducted completely by members of the same party as the President?
Not at all.
The last two impeachments were conducted in a much more fair and equitable manner. Schiff is conflicted. He lied about the WB contacting his office. He should not be in charge of this farce.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Judge Nepoliano defends the House and the Impeachment process on Fox News: https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1189864739041693696
Schiff is neither independent nor an investigator.
So is the GOP stance that impeachment is only legitimate if it is conducted completely by members of the same party as the President?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Judge Nepoliano defends the House and the Impeachment process on Fox News: https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1189864739041693696
Schiff is neither independent nor an investigator.
Anonymous wrote:Judge Nepoliano defends the House and the Impeachment process on Fox News: https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1189864739041693696
Anonymous wrote:Jeff VanDrew (NJ) and Collin Peterson (MN) are the 2 Democrats who voted no on moving forward with public phase of impeachment inquiry. They should be primaried.
Anonymous wrote:McCarthy sucks. He's attacking the Dems instead of addressing the facts about Trump. So weak.