Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No surprise in Cohen’s testimony today. But he’s certainly clarifying that Trump was worried about the damage the porn stars would do to his presidential campaign.
Directly conflicting the testimony of Hope Hicks and Madeleine Westerhout.
Who is more credible? (It's not a convicted felon and serial liar)
There are those who say Cohen has been a very good witness. Let's not forget that anyone with an IQ over 50 also knows that Trump is a pathological liar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No surprise in Cohen’s testimony today. But he’s certainly clarifying that Trump was worried about the damage the porn stars would do to his presidential campaign.
Directly conflicting the testimony of Hope Hicks and Madeleine Westerhout.
Who is more credible? (It's not a convicted felon and serial liar)
Anonymous wrote:So Speaker Johnson, one of the most fundamentalist devout evangelical Christians in elected office, is going to New York today to defend Donal Trump's extramarital affair and having unprotected sex with a porn star.
Anonymous wrote:So Speaker Johnson, one of the most fundamentalist devout evangelical Christians in elected office, is going to New York today to defend Donal Trump's extramarital affair and having unprotected sex with a porn star.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:National Enquirer guy said he did this for Trump going back decades. Trump wasn't running for President then.
Wait I thought the story was that Trump didn’t have anything to do with this.
Who said that? It is the prosecutors trying to imply that NDAs and this 'conspiracy' or 'scheme' is illegal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:National Enquirer guy said he did this for Trump going back decades. Trump wasn't running for President then.
Wait I thought the story was that Trump didn’t have anything to do with this.
Who said that? It is the prosecutors trying to imply that NDAs and this 'conspiracy' or 'scheme' is illegal.
Trumps lawyers said in the opening statement that trump didn’t have anything to do with the nda.
I guess too bad for the defense that Cohen had taped Trump micromanaging the entire deal.
The whole defense strategy of deny everything makes no sense when the prosecution has so much evidence of so much. But Trump probably insisted on it.
Trump is so colossally stupid. It boggles my mind that anyone could vote for him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:National Enquirer guy said he did this for Trump going back decades. Trump wasn't running for President then.
Wait I thought the story was that Trump didn’t have anything to do with this.
Who said that? It is the prosecutors trying to imply that NDAs and this 'conspiracy' or 'scheme' is illegal.
Trumps lawyers said in the opening statement that trump didn’t have anything to do with the nda.
I guess too bad for the defense that Cohen had taped Trump micromanaging the entire deal.
The whole defense strategy of deny everything makes no sense when the prosecution has so much evidence of so much. But Trump probably insisted on it.
Trump is so colossally stupid. It boggles my mind that anyone could vote for him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:National Enquirer guy said he did this for Trump going back decades. Trump wasn't running for President then.
Wait I thought the story was that Trump didn’t have anything to do with this.
Who said that? It is the prosecutors trying to imply that NDAs and this 'conspiracy' or 'scheme' is illegal.
Trumps lawyers said in the opening statement that trump didn’t have anything to do with the nda.
I guess too bad for the defense that Cohen had taped Trump micromanaging the entire deal.
The whole defense strategy of deny everything makes no sense when the prosecution has so much evidence of so much. But Trump probably insisted on it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:National Enquirer guy said he did this for Trump going back decades. Trump wasn't running for President then.
Wait I thought the story was that Trump didn’t have anything to do with this.
Who said that? It is the prosecutors trying to imply that NDAs and this 'conspiracy' or 'scheme' is illegal.
Trumps lawyers said in the opening statement that trump didn’t have anything to do with the nda.
I guess too bad for the defense that Cohen had taped Trump micromanaging the entire deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:National Enquirer guy said he did this for Trump going back decades. Trump wasn't running for President then.
Wait I thought the story was that Trump didn’t have anything to do with this.
Who said that? It is the prosecutors trying to imply that NDAs and this 'conspiracy' or 'scheme' is illegal.
Trumps lawyers said in the opening statement that trump didn’t have anything to do with the nda.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:National Enquirer guy said he did this for Trump going back decades. Trump wasn't running for President then.
Wait I thought the story was that Trump didn’t have anything to do with this.
Who said that? It is the prosecutors trying to imply that NDAs and this 'conspiracy' or 'scheme' is illegal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:National Enquirer guy said he did this for Trump going back decades. Trump wasn't running for President then.
Wait I thought the story was that Trump didn’t have anything to do with this.
Who said that? It is the prosecutors trying to imply that NDAs and this 'conspiracy' or 'scheme' is illegal.