Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only reason why urbanists have become influential is because their message supports monied interests. There is no other reason. It is certainly not because it is popular nor is it about "racial justice"
Vast majority of Americans prefer not only the exurban to the urban lifestyle, including vast majority of Blacks. Even more hilarious, half of all people that live in urban areas prefer to leave for the exurbs.
These people and their agenda are very and deeply unpopular and thank god that the pandemic is likely to bury them.
Monied interests? SFH NIMBYs have made hundreds of billions in wealth because of the lack of new housing. That's where the money is. Apartment dwellers are "monied interests" now?
LMAO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only reason why urbanists have become influential is because their message supports monied interests. There is no other reason. It is certainly not because it is popular nor is it about "racial justice"
Vast majority of Americans prefer not only the exurban to the urban lifestyle, including vast majority of Blacks. Even more hilarious, half of all people that live in urban areas prefer to leave for the exurbs.
These people and their agenda are very and deeply unpopular and thank god that the pandemic is likely to bury them.
Then the republicans who prefer drivable communities should pay the full costs to live there rather than depend on the subsidies from the urban dwellers.
They do and then some. You don’t seem to know how subdivisions are built.
I don't think you understand the externalities - pollution, middle east military intervention, environmental degradation of arable land and factoring those costs into the equation.
I don’t think you understand where govt revenue is generated to pay for transit subsidies. SFHs in subdivisions are the cash cow that pays for everything. Who do you think pays for your subsidized services? You never wondered where capital budgets come from and why they are separated from operating budgets? Which budget gets cut first? Who is subsidizing who exactly?
Anonymous wrote:
I don’t think you understand where govt revenue is generated to pay for transit subsidies. SFHs in subdivisions are the cash cow that pays for everything. Who do you think pays for your subsidized services? You never wondered where capital budgets come from and why they are separated from operating budgets? Which budget gets cut first? Who is subsidizing who exactly?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only reason why urbanists have become influential is because their message supports monied interests. There is no other reason. It is certainly not because it is popular nor is it about "racial justice"
Vast majority of Americans prefer not only the exurban to the urban lifestyle, including vast majority of Blacks. Even more hilarious, half of all people that live in urban areas prefer to leave for the exurbs.
These people and their agenda are very and deeply unpopular and thank god that the pandemic is likely to bury them.
Then the republicans who prefer drivable communities should pay the full costs to live there rather than depend on the subsidies from the urban dwellers.
They do and then some. You don’t seem to know how subdivisions are built.
I don't think you understand the externalities - pollution, middle east military intervention, environmental degradation of arable land and factoring those costs into the equation.
I don’t think you understand where govt revenue is generated to pay for transit subsidies. SFHs in subdivisions are the cash cow that pays for everything. Who do you think pays for your subsidized services? You never wondered where capital budgets come from and why they are separated from operating budgets? Which budget gets cut first? Who is subsidizing who exactly?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only reason why urbanists have become influential is because their message supports monied interests. There is no other reason. It is certainly not because it is popular nor is it about "racial justice"
Vast majority of Americans prefer not only the exurban to the urban lifestyle, including vast majority of Blacks. Even more hilarious, half of all people that live in urban areas prefer to leave for the exurbs.
These people and their agenda are very and deeply unpopular and thank god that the pandemic is likely to bury them.
Then the republicans who prefer drivable communities should pay the full costs to live there rather than depend on the subsidies from the urban dwellers.
They do and then some. You don’t seem to know how subdivisions are built.
I don't think you understand the externalities - pollution, middle east military intervention, environmental degradation of arable land and factoring those costs into the equation.
Anonymous wrote:The only reason why urbanists have become influential is because their message supports monied interests. There is no other reason. It is certainly not because it is popular nor is it about "racial justice"
Vast majority of Americans prefer not only the exurban to the urban lifestyle, including vast majority of Blacks. Even more hilarious, half of all people that live in urban areas prefer to leave for the exurbs.
These people and their agenda are very and deeply unpopular and thank god that the pandemic is likely to bury them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only reason why urbanists have become influential is because their message supports monied interests. There is no other reason. It is certainly not because it is popular nor is it about "racial justice"
Vast majority of Americans prefer not only the exurban to the urban lifestyle, including vast majority of Blacks. Even more hilarious, half of all people that live in urban areas prefer to leave for the exurbs.
These people and their agenda are very and deeply unpopular and thank god that the pandemic is likely to bury them.
Then the republicans who prefer drivable communities should pay the full costs to live there rather than depend on the subsidies from the urban dwellers.
They do and then some. You don’t seem to know how subdivisions are built.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only reason why urbanists have become influential is because their message supports monied interests. There is no other reason. It is certainly not because it is popular nor is it about "racial justice"
Vast majority of Americans prefer not only the exurban to the urban lifestyle, including vast majority of Blacks. Even more hilarious, half of all people that live in urban areas prefer to leave for the exurbs.
These people and their agenda are very and deeply unpopular and thank god that the pandemic is likely to bury them.
Then the republicans who prefer drivable communities should pay the full costs to live there rather than depend on the subsidies from the urban dwellers.
Anonymous wrote:The only reason why urbanists have become influential is because their message supports monied interests. There is no other reason. It is certainly not because it is popular nor is it about "racial justice"
Vast majority of Americans prefer not only the exurban to the urban lifestyle, including vast majority of Blacks. Even more hilarious, half of all people that live in urban areas prefer to leave for the exurbs.
These people and their agenda are very and deeply unpopular and thank god that the pandemic is likely to bury them.
Anonymous wrote:The only reason why urbanists have become influential is because their message supports monied interests. There is no other reason. It is certainly not because it is popular nor is it about "racial justice"
Vast majority of Americans prefer not only the exurban to the urban lifestyle, including vast majority of Blacks. Even more hilarious, half of all people that live in urban areas prefer to leave for the exurbs.
These people and their agenda are very and deeply unpopular and thank god that the pandemic is likely to bury them.
Anonymous wrote:The only reason why urbanists have become influential is because their message supports monied interests. There is no other reason. It is certainly not because it is popular nor is it about "racial justice"
Vast majority of Americans prefer not only the exurban to the urban lifestyle, including vast majority of Blacks. Even more hilarious, half of all people that live in urban areas prefer to leave for the exurbs.
These people and their agenda are very and deeply unpopular and thank god that the pandemic is likely to bury them.

Anonymous wrote:There has to be some line drawn on historic neighborhoods. If you can’t do that, why would anyone think the urbanists can be trusted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It’s hard to see how one can add infill development of 12 stories to historic district blocks that vary from one to four stories without basically saying that the historic district shouldn’t really matter anymore. Even DC’s guidelines for infill in his Otis districts generally limit height to within one additional story of the adjacent structures.
Not really. We've written historic district regulations based on "compatibility," i.e., the new stuff has to look like the old stuff. But it doesn't have to be that way. For example, historic districts could require preservation of the historic buildings but allow new, infill buildings to look different, have different heights, etc.
But then it wouldn’t be much of an historic district anymore. But that’s the Trumpy DC Smart Growth objective, isn’t it?