Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Boy, I have a whole lot of conflicting thoughts over this.

I think sex work should be decriminalized, and I don't really enjoy the idea of someone - even someone terrible - being taken down over behavior I think should be legal between consenting adults.

That said, were they all adults? That seems up in the air. 17 isn't 14 or 12 but it's also not GREAT and possibly not legal.

The campaign finance stuff is just, like, dude - cmon dude. Don't be THAT idiot.

In short, he'll probably run for president in 2024.

What do you mean, “possibly” not legal?

17 isn't illegal in all states in all circumstances - it depends on where, and if it crossed state lines

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FOX has covered it all throughout the morning, afternoon and evening. Not sure what you're talking about.

So does this mean he won't be going back on Tucker's show?

Anonymous wrote:Boy, I have a whole lot of conflicting thoughts over this.

I think sex work should be decriminalized, and I don't really enjoy the idea of someone - even someone terrible - being taken down over behavior I think should be legal between consenting adults.

That said, were they all adults? That seems up in the air. 17 isn't 14 or 12 but it's also not GREAT and possibly not legal.

The campaign finance stuff is just, like, dude - cmon dude. Don't be THAT idiot.

In short, he'll probably run for president in 2024.

What do you mean, “possibly” not legal?

Boy, I have a whole lot of conflicting thoughts over this.

I think sex work should be decriminalized, and I don't really enjoy the idea of someone - even someone terrible - being taken down over behavior I think should be legal between consenting adults.

That said, were they all adults? That seems up in the air. 17 isn't 14 or 12 but it's also not GREAT and possibly not legal.

The campaign finance stuff is just, like, dude - cmon dude. Don't be THAT idiot.

In short, he'll probably run for president in 2024.

Anonymous wrote:FOX has covered it all throughout the morning, afternoon and evening. Not sure what you're talking about.

Anonymous wrote:so is Newsmax going to welcome him at this point? is he too damaged for them too?

Seems like a selling point to Newsmax. Lies and criminals.

so is Newsmax going to welcome him at this point? is he too damaged for them too?

All I can see when I look at him is this. I can’t be the only one.

Anonymous wrote:Hello federal prison

Wow. Imagine us finally holding Republicans accountable for their crimes. 2021 is looking up.

Its always the Communications Director first. Boebert's comms director resigned just before she got pulled off all her committees.

Anonymous wrote:When you cannot defend the indefensible

FBI agents will be interviewing him before the day is out. While emotions are fresh. 🙂

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder if his engagement to 26 year old Ginger Luckey is still on? I wonder what her parents are thinking?

Please! Her brother sold his 2 years old VR company to big tech for 2 billion. They do not seem sophisticated people. Hanging out at Mar-E-Lago with Fox News folks. They are just a bunch of hilly billy nerds who became rich and thought that this was a good match. It was not a love-match. He wanted her money and maybe a beard or alibi. She wanted to be a politician's wife.

This is the picture of her brother and sister-in-law. They are not terribly sophisticated people, just like many of the other tech millionaires/billionaires.

Some things cannot be unseen.

She has a nice body but it looks like they spent part of that first big paycheck on bad breast implants. I can always tell by the roundness at the top. Like somebody put a couple of inflatable balls on her chest. He needs to invest in a trainer and dietitian. Her brother; not her father has money. She works for a living. I have the impression that she’s a naive “Christian” girl. She’s locked her social media but she had pictures with Gaetz and Nestor spending family time. I feel a little sorry for her but they met at Mar A Lago. A nice girl would not have been there in the first place. #WaterGaetz

When you cannot defend the indefensible

The panhandle weighs in:

“According to three people with direct knowledge of the incident: Greenberg visited the Lake Mary, Florida branch of his tax collection agency that weekend. Grainy surveillance footage captured Greenberg standing near a manager’s desk with another man. Greenberg forgot to set the alarm on the way out, which concerned the assistant branch manager when she walked into the office Monday morning. That employee was surprised to find that driver licenses—which are normally turned in when expired at the tax office for shredding—were scattered all over the desk instead of in the appropriate disposal basket. She reviewed the camera footage and alerted her boss, who in turn contacted Greenberg via text.

“Did you happen to visit the Lake Mary Office on the weekend?” the text message read.

The image obtained by The Daily Beast shows that Greenberg allegedly responded: “Yes I was showing congressman Gaetz what our operation looked like. Did I leave something on?”

When Greenberg later came under investigation by the Secret Service for identity theft and stalking, agents approached former employees at the tax office to obtain proof of the public official’s activities. That’s when they were suddenly directed to Gaetz.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/these-text-messages-led-the-feds-to-matt-gaetz