Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait is this a thing? Are parents really creating checklists and gossiping about the 'dumb' students in their kids classrooms? Wow.

I hope not but the one mom who keeps doubling down is making me question. You really, as an outside person, cannot and should not be judging other people’s kids academic capabilities based on what you overhear in an online classroom. I strongly dislike the idea parents think they can say things like who in their kid’s class are “low.” That phrasing alone is problematic, I only use it because she did, specifically saying “the lowest 4” aren’t going in.

Going after teachers is one thing. Listening and watching and then thinking you can judge other people’s small kids is another. Bothers me a lot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait is this a thing? Are parents really creating checklists and gossiping about the 'dumb' students in their kids classrooms? Wow.

I hope not but the one mom who keeps doubling down is making me question. You really, as an outside person, cannot and should not be judging other people’s kids academic capabilities based on what you overhear in an online classroom. I strongly dislike the idea parents think they can say things like who in their kid’s class are “low.” That phrasing alone is problematic, I only use it because she did, specifically saying “the lowest 4” aren’t going in.

Going after teachers is one thing. Listening and watching and then thinking you can judge other people’s small kids is another. Bothers me a lot.

Anonymous wrote:Wait is this a thing? Are parents really creating checklists and gossiping about the 'dumb' students in their kids classrooms? Wow.

Anonymous wrote:I’m not uncomfortable at all. I’m well aware I’m teaching in kids’ homes. I have nothing to hide so it isn’t an issue for me and it hasn’t been for any parents either. I’m simply saying, tracking the progress of other kids to the point you think you know “the lowest 4” feels wrong to me. How would you like if another mom heard your kid attempting a difficult read aloud and said “wow I’m glad he’s going virtual since he’s a low reader.”

Anonymous wrote:I’m not uncomfortable at all. I’m well aware I’m teaching in kids’ homes. I have nothing to hide so it isn’t an issue for me and it hasn’t been for any parents either. I’m simply saying, tracking the progress of other kids to the point you think you know “the lowest 4” feels wrong to me. How would you like if another mom heard your kid attempting a difficult read aloud and said “wow I’m glad he’s going virtual since he’s a low reader.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:they're terrified because they see that the well-behaved kids are all planning to stay DL and all the troublemakers will be returning to class.

In my son’s K class they just said goodbye to the kids who are switching to a new class to stay virtual. The entire lowest group (4 kids) - the ones who still can’t count to 50 and don’t know all their letters - are staying virtual. The remaining class will actually be easier to manage now. Unfortunate but true.

I say this as both teacher and mom, it is really write that you know who the lowest 4 in your kids’ class are. I’m just stunned any of you know this much about all your kid’s peers.

Agreed!

I wouldn’t normally, but my kid has been going to Kindergarten on an iPad while I sit in the same room trying to work since September. It’s hard not to notice who needs the most help and who is being grouped together. If they had been in school I would have no idea. I look forward to not overhearing 1st grade and beyond.

Your kid didn’t wear headphones? You were working” while also paying close enough attention to know which 4 kids can’t count to 50? Come on.

News flash- most kindergarteners are not capable of sitting in front of a screen on their own and following along with distance learning/navigating between different portals without substantial parental support so yes, if you can’t afford a full time tutor/nanny and don’t want your kid to be one of those bottom four you pretty much do need to be constantly monitoring. This is why distance learning for the early elementary students is a joke. The posters criticizing op clearly have older children and just don’t get it.

No I’m the teacher mom Pp and my first grade kid did DL til they went back. She needed occasional help but my job meant I didn’t get to sit in and listen and take notes to the point I could tell you who were the “lowest 4” in her class.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I thought teachers were smart, do they not realize healthcare workers have been going in before the vaccine

They are smart. They even know how to avoid using run-on sentences and when to use question marks.

Apparently not science smart...

Hey loser. Teachers are going back. You’ll need to go find someone new to bully.

No too many were granted bogus exceptions

True, there will be FOIA and lawsuits to hold exceptions accountable to the law, inmates are running the aps asylum

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I thought teachers were smart, do they not realize healthcare workers have been going in before the vaccine

They are smart. They even know how to avoid using run-on sentences and when to use question marks.

Apparently not science smart...

Hey loser. Teachers are going back. You’ll need to go find someone new to bully.

No too many were granted bogus exceptions

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I thought teachers were smart, do they not realize healthcare workers have been going in before the vaccine

They are smart. They even know how to avoid using run-on sentences and when to use question marks.

Apparently not science smart...

Hey loser. Teachers are going back. You’ll need to go find someone new to bully.

No too many were granted bogus exceptions