Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Robinhood restricting new purchases of particular stocks. How unethical is the platform?

you get what you pay for. People wanted free and they got that level of service

Dude, shut up. You're a broken record. Almost every major broker is now commissions free. Your point is moot. It's pure manipulation to ban anyone from making a free choice to buy what they want on the market.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Robinhood restricting new purchases of particular stocks. How unethical is the platform?

you get what you pay for. People wanted free and they got that level of service

Dude, shut up. You're a broken record. Almost every major broker is now commissions free. Your point is moot. It's pure manipulation to ban anyone from making a free choice to buy what they want on the market.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Robinhood restricting new purchases of particular stocks. How unethical is the platform?

you get what you pay for. People wanted free and they got that level of service

Dude, shut up. You're a broken record. Almost every major broker is now commissions free. Your point is moot. It's pure manipulation to ban anyone from making a free choice to buy what they want on the market.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Robinhood restricting new purchases of particular stocks. How unethical is the platform?

you get what you pay for. People wanted free and they got that level of service

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Citadel refusing to fill RH buy orders on a stock they have an interest in is illegal. That's straight up manipulation. Refusing to sell or placing high limits is not illegal and is normal market behavior.

why? Citadel has no obligation to fill any orders

Robinhood now clears their own orders. But Citadel is RH's biggest client in terms of fee-based income for data access, plus Citadel has a sizeable stake in RH.

This sh#t is wild. Conflict of interests galore. I predict a lot of new regulation for Broker-Dealers after this.

I think the retail investors will still end up getting crushed when the dust settles, but broker dealers are as shady as it gets - they need far more regulation

Crushed by what?

do you think the people buying now will be able to sell at prices even close to what they bought at?

Do you think that's the reason that people are buying now?

Anonymous wrote:Robinhood restricting new purchases of particular stocks. How unethical is the platform?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Citadel refusing to fill RH buy orders on a stock they have an interest in is illegal. That's straight up manipulation. Refusing to sell or placing high limits is not illegal and is normal market behavior.

why? Citadel has no obligation to fill any orders

Robinhood now clears their own orders. But Citadel is RH's biggest client in terms of fee-based income for data access, plus Citadel has a sizeable stake in RH.

This sh#t is wild. Conflict of interests galore. I predict a lot of new regulation for Broker-Dealers after this.

I think the retail investors will still end up getting crushed when the dust settles, but broker dealers are as shady as it gets - they need far more regulation

Crushed by what?

do you think the people buying now will be able to sell at prices even close to what they bought at?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:you can still buy gme on fidelity. 285/share is too rich for the non-gambler in me

How do you feel about Tootsie Roll Industries? Next to AMC is the snacks.

AMC feels like the 2nd best solid play. Movies will return with a vengeance after the vaccines ramp up. I think there's also a distinct possibility of a vertical play by Disney, Amazon, or Netflix to buy out a major movie chain while it's cheap.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Citadel refusing to fill RH buy orders on a stock they have an interest in is illegal. That's straight up manipulation. Refusing to sell or placing high limits is not illegal and is normal market behavior.

why? Citadel has no obligation to fill any orders

Robinhood now clears their own orders. But Citadel is RH's biggest client in terms of fee-based income for data access, plus Citadel has a sizeable stake in RH.

This sh#t is wild. Conflict of interests galore. I predict a lot of new regulation for Broker-Dealers after this.

I think the retail investors will still end up getting crushed when the dust settles, but broker dealers are as shady as it gets - they need far more regulation

Crushed by what?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I happened to buy AMC when it was $2 a share, before all this was going on. Once I saw what was going on with GME and that AMC was getting caught up in it I was psyched. Now, though, I'm irritated that the trading platforms are getting in the way. At this point, I'm still up, but if I AMC goes crazy like GME did I'd sell.

You might be blocked. New regulations are about to be put into place.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:you can still buy gme on fidelity. 285/share is too rich for the non-gambler in me

How do you feel about Tootsie Roll Industries? Next to AMC is the snacks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want to buy AMC but RH is preventing me. What gives? I don't like this paternal Wall Street bs.

Did you read upthread? You can still buy on vanguard.