Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't they reach a civilized arrangement where they live close by but lead separate lives? They they can both raise their children and be at peace.
Does he care about being civil though? He kind of seems like he viewed her as a brood mare to get some appropriate heirs and has never stopped having kids out of wedlock and bedding other women. She has no leverage whatsoever.
I never understood this marriage to begin with. She never looks happy. He is who he is. They certainly courted long enough, you can't say she was pressured to marry him. Why? Why marry?
Reports at the time of their wedding said that Charlene tried to bolt but her passport was confiscated and she was persuaded to go through with it. She looked like she had seen a ghost all throughout the ceremony.
I think it defies belief that someone strong enough to make an Olympic team could be forced to go along with anything. What possible leverage would Albert have over her if she said no? Do you really think he could hold her prisoner indefinitely? If he did at all? Do you think maybe the sparkles of royalty did their thing? Despite Albert's glaring faults, a royal prince could easily, EASILY find many many willing brides.
I think you are being really naive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't they reach a civilized arrangement where they live close by but lead separate lives? They they can both raise their children and be at peace.
Does he care about being civil though? He kind of seems like he viewed her as a brood mare to get some appropriate heirs and has never stopped having kids out of wedlock and bedding other women. She has no leverage whatsoever.
I never understood this marriage to begin with. She never looks happy. He is who he is. They certainly courted long enough, you can't say she was pressured to marry him. Why? Why marry?
Reports at the time of their wedding said that Charlene tried to bolt but her passport was confiscated and she was persuaded to go through with it. She looked like she had seen a ghost all throughout the ceremony.
I think it defies belief that someone strong enough to make an Olympic team could be forced to go along with anything. What possible leverage would Albert have over her if she said no? Do you really think he could hold her prisoner indefinitely? If he did at all? Do you think maybe the sparkles of royalty did their thing? Despite Albert's glaring faults, a royal prince could easily, EASILY find many many willing brides.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't they reach a civilized arrangement where they live close by but lead separate lives? They they can both raise their children and be at peace.
Does he care about being civil though? He kind of seems like he viewed her as a brood mare to get some appropriate heirs and has never stopped having kids out of wedlock and bedding other women. She has no leverage whatsoever.
I never understood this marriage to begin with. She never looks happy. He is who he is. They certainly courted long enough, you can't say she was pressured to marry him. Why? Why marry?
Reports at the time of their wedding said that Charlene tried to bolt but her passport was confiscated and she was persuaded to go through with it. She looked like she had seen a ghost all throughout the ceremony.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't they reach a civilized arrangement where they live close by but lead separate lives? They they can both raise their children and be at peace.
Does he care about being civil though? He kind of seems like he viewed her as a brood mare to get some appropriate heirs and has never stopped having kids out of wedlock and bedding other women. She has no leverage whatsoever.
I never understood this marriage to begin with. She never looks happy. He is who he is. They certainly courted long enough, you can't say she was pressured to marry him. Why? Why marry?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't they reach a civilized arrangement where they live close by but lead separate lives? They they can both raise their children and be at peace.
Does he care about being civil though? He kind of seems like he viewed her as a brood mare to get some appropriate heirs and has never stopped having kids out of wedlock and bedding other women. She has no leverage whatsoever.
Anonymous wrote:Why can't they reach a civilized arrangement where they live close by but lead separate lives? They they can both raise their children and be at peace.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting choice for the Princess of Monaco. Something must be going on. Mid-life crisis? The pressure of being Princess of Monaco and she needed to burst out and do something? She's always had "normal" hairstyles but to go punk as a 42 year old mother who also happens to be a Princess? There is something else going on.

Anonymous wrote:Why can't they reach a civilized arrangement where they live close by but lead separate lives? They they can both raise their children and be at peace.
Anonymous wrote:Why can't they reach a civilized arrangement where they live close by but lead separate lives? They they can both raise their children and be at peace.