Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone on twitter brought up a valid point. She claims to have also been a senate staffer at the time and recalled that the dress code required women to wear pantyhose with skirts. Those of us who are old enough to remember pantyhose can verify that they were constricting enough to practically cut off circulation. It is hard to imagine that he was able to reach up her skirt and inside pantyhose far enough to penetrate. Especially while standing up in a hallway where someone could have walked by at anytime.

I'm from that generation and I remember thigh highs. Don't you? They were all the rage,
Any plenty of women have worn stockings with a garter versus actual pantyhose. Some do for health reasons.

Not in the early 90s

Yes, in the early 90s. My mother bought them for me. Who they hell are you to speak for all women and products?

Did you work on Capitol Hill? No? Then you're irrelevant.

Yes, for my Ohio congressman before going to nonprofit. Why keep insulting me? What’s wrong with you? Issue is dead — Tara Reade says she was not wearing pantyhose due to warm spring weather. You are weirdly aggressive on what type of pantyhose women wore.

You would have to believe her. I don't.

Anybody who has looked at the whole of her past, especially her tweets, can't consider her credible. She has an ax to grind.

Did you read about the nonprofit she allegedly stole from? The owner has receipts and proof.

Medium has a good, short piece on the whole stealing-from-the-nonprofit thing.

https://medium.com/@eddiekrassenstein/biden-accuser-tara-reade-allegedly-stole-from-a-non-profit-organization-e276cac68a2b

From the feminist who runs the nonprofit: "Look, this isn’t about protecting women,” says Hummer. “This isn’t about the #metoo movement. This isn’t about Joe Biden.. This is about truth. Tara Reade stole from me. She lied to me. She stole from my organization. She manipulated me and she duped me. I want that to be shared because it’s important information. And I have documentation, images and emails to prove it.”

Anonymous wrote:How is it right now one candidate who denied an allegation of sexual assault is a bigger story today than his opponent who admitted to regularly sexually assaulting women. He likes to “grab them be the pussy”. What is the standard here. Ask Trump today if he still likes it

Anonymous wrote:How is it right now one candidate who denied an allegation of sexual assault is a bigger story today than his opponent who admitted to regularly sexually assaulting women. He likes to “grab them be the pussy”. What is the standard here. Ask Trump today if he still likes it

Anonymous wrote:Business Insider: "Here are all the times Joe Biden has been accused of acting inappropriately toward women and girls"

In May 2019, Biden told a 10-year-old girl, "I bet you're as bright as you are good-looking."

https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-biden-allegations-women-2020-campaign-2019-6#vail-kohnert-yount-a-former-white-house-intern-told-the-post-that-when-she-met-biden-in-2013-he-put-his-hand-on-the-back-of-my-head-and-pressed-his-forehead-to-my-forehead-kohnert-yount-also-said-biden-called-her-a-pretty-girl-7

Anonymous wrote:Biden is toast.

What self-respecting woman would ruin their political career by agreeing to be his running mate. The whole election cycle would be the Veep candidate trying to defend Biden against this sexual assault claim.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

Yes that would be good. And not an unelected Hollywood actress.

Didn't Mazie Hirono say "they need to be believed"?

She had a caveat, "if their story is credible." Which still goes further than most other Democrats were saying.

Still waiting for you to provide a quote to support this. You've been asked by several people.

LISTEN to all women. Don't necessarily believe 100% of them, that's not realistic.

No caveat in Mazie Hirono's statement...she said that not only do they need to be heard, they need to be believed.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/mazie-hirono-believe-accusers-not-stance-for-daniel-inouye/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

Yes that would be good. And not an unelected Hollywood actress.

Didn't Mazie Hirono say "they need to be believed"?

She had a caveat, "if their story is credible." Which still goes further than most other Democrats were saying.

Still waiting for you to provide a quote to support this. You've been asked by several people.

LISTEN to all women. Don't necessarily believe 100% of them, that's not realistic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

Anonymous wrote:I’d want to interview the three interns Tara Reade had been supervising, before she was suddenly demoted into isolation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Yeah... this doesn’t help her credibility.

Or anyone believing her. WTAF?!

How would those texts be relevant in an alleged sexual assault case? They are free speech political viewpoints.

They’re not. They have nothing to do with her rape accusation. And I remember a certain someone who had ultra-liberal views, and Democrats insisted those views had *nothing* to do with her (flimsy) allegation. So fun how the goalposts move depending on who’s being accused.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

Yes that would be good. And not an unelected Hollywood actress.

Didn't Mazie Hirono say "they need to be believed"?

She had a caveat, "if their story is credible." Which still goes further than most other Democrats were saying.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

Yes that would be good. And not an unelected Hollywood actress.

Didn't Mazie Hirono say "they need to be believed"?