Anonymous wrote:Alexandria City resident positive who had contact at Virginia Theological Seminary (so related to Georgetown Christchurch case)
Anonymous wrote:Alexandria City resident positive who had contact at Virginia Theological Seminary (so related to Georgetown Christchurch case)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The news reports with “from international travel” are ridiculous. When you’re only testing people that meet the international travel to specific countries criteria, then of course the presumed positives are “from international travel”.
The Georgetown one is an exception and that was only tested because of the connection with that case.
The Georgetown rector had no travel, how was he able to get tested?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The news reports with “from international travel” are ridiculous. When you’re only testing people that meet the international travel to specific countries criteria, then of course the presumed positives are “from international travel”.
The Georgetown one is an exception and that was only tested because of the connection with that case.
The Georgetown rector had no travel, how was he able to get tested?
He went to an Episcopal conference in Kentucky - at least 2 other people who went also have the virus.
Rector from Texas - https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/local/2020/03/11/coronavirus-texas-resident-coronavirus-kentucky/5019263002/
Matthew Broderick's sister, who's with the Beverly Hills church - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-8103149/Matthew-Brodericks-sister-Rev-Janet-Broderick-tests-positive-coronavirus.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The news reports with “from international travel” are ridiculous. When you’re only testing people that meet the international travel to specific countries criteria, then of course the presumed positives are “from international travel”.
The Georgetown one is an exception and that was only tested because of the connection with that case.
The Georgetown rector had no travel, how was he able to get tested?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The news reports with “from international travel” are ridiculous. When you’re only testing people that meet the international travel to specific countries criteria, then of course the presumed positives are “from international travel”.
The Georgetown one is an exception and that was only tested because of the connection with that case.
The Georgetown rector had no travel, how was he able to get tested?
Yeah, how did he get it in the first place?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The news reports with “from international travel” are ridiculous. When you’re only testing people that meet the international travel to specific countries criteria, then of course the presumed positives are “from international travel”.
The Georgetown one is an exception and that was only tested because of the connection with that case.
The Georgetown rector had no travel, how was he able to get tested?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one concerned by our lack of more results today? To me this is just another confirmation of inadequate testing...
No you aren't. It is not conceivable that we've only gone up by 1 since yesterday. If Virginia's only had capacity to test 200-300 people a day they haven't been testing nearly enough. There are more out there. I'm not relying on # of confirmed cases
Per day? It sounds like the state of Virginia only has 300-400 test kits total right now.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/virginias-governor-gives-coronavirus-update-after-8-people-test-positive/2237298/%3famp
Anonymous wrote:The news reports with “from international travel” are ridiculous. When you’re only testing people that meet the international travel to specific countries criteria, then of course the presumed positives are “from international travel”.
The Georgetown one is an exception and that was only tested because of the connection with that case.