Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do all these pro-segregation posters actually live here?
Can you point out a pro-segregation post?
Nobody is forcing anybody of any color to live anywhere.
Then why are the schools segregated? Because people can't live just anywhere. Further, there are a number of historical factors that created this situation.
1) Restricting the majority all the low-income housing to a few areas
2) historical practices like red-lining
3) gerrymandering school boundaries to exclude low-income students or the reverse
? How is that the fault of MCPS? MoCo now mandates moderate price dwellings in new multi-unit builds in wealthy areas. What do you want MCPS to do about housing policies?
Also, MCPS is trying to "force busing" according to some. So, seems to me like MCPS is trying to de-segregate. Again, what else do you want MCPS to do? And please stop with the .."defending segregation" nonsense. You seem to never answer my question about what else MCPS is supposed to do about de facto segregation due to housing prices.
Obviously MCPS can't do anything about housing policies. But they CAN do something about school boundaries.
And what should they do about school boundaries? Change them on a street-by-street basis? Why not go house-by-house? How are you going to make sure the schools are balanced? At the end of the day, you would need to move a lot of hispanic, black, white, Asian, gay, straight, rich, middle class, poor, and others around in order to balance the schools. It seems like people are obsessed with certain schools performing well. I would like to see what exactly people think can be done.
We need to get the 60+ year old women out of the school board. Having children in school should be a requirement to be on the board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do all these pro-segregation posters actually live here?
Can you point out a pro-segregation post?
Nobody is forcing anybody of any color to live anywhere.
Then why are the schools segregated? Because people can't live just anywhere. Further, there are a number of historical factors that created this situation.
1) Restricting the majority all the low-income housing to a few areas
2) historical practices like red-lining
3) gerrymandering school boundaries to exclude low-income students or the reverse
? How is that the fault of MCPS? MoCo now mandates moderate price dwellings in new multi-unit builds in wealthy areas. What do you want MCPS to do about housing policies?
Also, MCPS is trying to "force busing" according to some. So, seems to me like MCPS is trying to de-segregate. Again, what else do you want MCPS to do? And please stop with the .."defending segregation" nonsense. You seem to never answer my question about what else MCPS is supposed to do about de facto segregation due to housing prices.
Obviously MCPS can't do anything about housing policies. But they CAN do something about school boundaries.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do all these pro-segregation posters actually live here?
Can you point out a pro-segregation post?
Nobody is forcing anybody of any color to live anywhere.
Then why are the schools segregated? Because people can't live just anywhere. Further, there are a number of historical factors that created this situation.
1) Restricting the majority all the low-income housing to a few areas
2) historical practices like red-lining
3) gerrymandering school boundaries to exclude low-income students or the reverse
? How is that the fault of MCPS? MoCo now mandates moderate price dwellings in new multi-unit builds in wealthy areas. What do you want MCPS to do about housing policies?
Also, MCPS is trying to "force busing" according to some. So, seems to me like MCPS is trying to de-segregate. Again, what else do you want MCPS to do? And please stop with the .."defending segregation" nonsense. You seem to never answer my question about what else MCPS is supposed to do about de facto segregation due to housing prices.
Obviously MCPS can't do anything about housing policies. But they CAN do something about school boundaries.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do all these pro-segregation posters actually live here?
Can you point out a pro-segregation post?
Nobody is forcing anybody of any color to live anywhere.
Then why are the schools segregated? Because people can't live just anywhere. Further, there are a number of historical factors that created this situation.
1) Restricting the majority all the low-income housing to a few areas
2) historical practices like red-lining
3) gerrymandering school boundaries to exclude low-income students or the reverse
? How is that the fault of MCPS? MoCo now mandates moderate price dwellings in new multi-unit builds in wealthy areas. What do you want MCPS to do about housing policies?
Also, MCPS is trying to "force busing" according to some. So, seems to me like MCPS is trying to de-segregate. Again, what else do you want MCPS to do? And please stop with the .."defending segregation" nonsense. You seem to never answer my question about what else MCPS is supposed to do about de facto segregation due to housing prices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do all these pro-segregation posters actually live here?
Can you point out a pro-segregation post?
Nobody is forcing anybody of any color to live anywhere.
Then why are the schools segregated? Because people can't live just anywhere. Further, there are a number of historical factors that created this situation.
1) Restricting the majority all the low-income housing to a few areas
2) historical practices like red-lining
3) gerrymandering school boundaries to exclude low-income students or the reverse
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do all these pro-segregation posters actually live here?
Can you point out a pro-segregation post?
Nobody is forcing anybody of any color to live anywhere.
Then why are the schools segregated? Because people can't live just anywhere. Further, there are a number of historical factors that created this situation.
1) Restricting the majority all the low-income housing to a few areas
2) historical practices like red-lining
3) gerrymandering school boundaries to exclude low-income students or the reverse
du jure segregation Is illegal. We have de facto segregation which is perfectly legal and is created by people moving into neighborhoods of others like them. We aren’t forcing the races to separate or Jews to live in ghettos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High-Quality public education shouldn't be contingent on living in a specific area. Bad and good schools shouldn't exist.
People swear up and down that MCPS is just one school system. Why isn’t MCPS providing a good education at EVERY school as it is.
Try again. Your premise is wrong. You think the school 100% determines a students abilities, work ethic, and skills. It is there to develop those, but if counterproductive forces are at home.... or lack of discipline at the school.....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do all these pro-segregation posters actually live here?
Can you point out a pro-segregation post?
Nobody is forcing anybody of any color to live anywhere.
Then why are the schools segregated? Because people can't live just anywhere. Further, there are a number of historical factors that created this situation.
1) Restricting the majority all the low-income housing to a few areas
2) historical practices like red-lining
3) gerrymandering school boundaries to exclude low-income students or the reverse
Anonymous wrote:Where does it stop. King eloquently noted our children should be judged on the content of their character -- not the color of their skin. Seems like the BoE is judging kids on their skin color. (And only types of color will be focused on in this 'diversity' study) Sorry my Asian friends you are not considered 'diverse' because you have high test scores than everyone...
What's next -- if the squash team at Richard Montgomery is all Asian do we now need a squash team based on this 'diversity' policy? Can't wait for that lawsuit...
Let's face it -- MCPS schools are ALL mediocre due to the BoE's decision to adopt Curriculum 2.0 for NINE years. Some schools are 'better' because of more parental involvement. (Tutoring, extracurricular activities, parental input -- i.e. emphasizing manners). 75% of student success depends on family input. That's the truth.
If the BoE persists in this social engineering project these schools are going to become more segregated -- and the tax base will be shredded. Ah, but our fearless leaders never acknowledge the law of unintended consequences...
Anonymous wrote:There are no “bad” students, only bad schools. If the goverment breaks up the bad schools and sends the students in bad schools to good schools, the students from the bad schools will do better. However, it is not fair that only the students in bad schools have to endure long bus ride so mcps boe members want to see how to put the kids in W schools on a bus and send them to the bad schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High-Quality public education shouldn't be contingent on living in a specific area. Bad and good schools shouldn't exist.
Bad students and good students exist. Always have, always will.
Same for parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High-Quality public education shouldn't be contingent on living in a specific area. Bad and good schools shouldn't exist.
Bad students and good students exist. Always have, always will.
Same for parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:High-Quality public education shouldn't be contingent on living in a specific area. Bad and good schools shouldn't exist.
People swear up and down that MCPS is just one school system. Why isn’t MCPS providing a good education at EVERY school as it is.