Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 22:30     Subject: Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

They need to ban motorised bikes from the bike paths and bike lanes. They belong in the street with the other motorised vehicles, not in the dedicated lanes for those who labour manually to move their bikes
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 22:15     Subject: Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I believe the percentage I read on one of the articles was that at least 40% of traffic driving through Alexandria were people passing through, people who's trip neither commenced nor would end in Alexandria, point A and point B were both somewhere else. Waze is kicking these drivers off 495/395/ GW Parkway/ Route 1 into the streets of Alexandria for their commutes or wherever it is they want to go. You are not going to efficiently reduce a "driving majority" by adding bike lanes and bigger sidewalks in Alexandria when almost 1/2 of the drivers in Alexandria aren't leaving or going to Alexandria. They are using the streets of Alexandria as a short cut. Stop with the nonsense, it is what it is.

This is a heavily populated area with people dispersed in large geographic areas. You cannot convert these people to bike the 15-20 miles in one direction. Enough already.

I live and work in Alexandria near one of the locations a road diet was used a few years ago. The traffic is obscene now. I hate it.


Why should the priority in Alexandria road design be the people who drive through Alexandria from somewhere else to somewhere else, over people who live in Alexandria? Drivers will use the streets of Alexandria as a short cut if that works for them. So Alexandria should stop making it work for them.


Whatever, always missing the point. Move to Holland if the only answer is bikes everywhere.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 21:30     Subject: Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

Anonymous wrote:I believe the percentage I read on one of the articles was that at least 40% of traffic driving through Alexandria were people passing through, people who's trip neither commenced nor would end in Alexandria, point A and point B were both somewhere else. Waze is kicking these drivers off 495/395/ GW Parkway/ Route 1 into the streets of Alexandria for their commutes or wherever it is they want to go. You are not going to efficiently reduce a "driving majority" by adding bike lanes and bigger sidewalks in Alexandria when almost 1/2 of the drivers in Alexandria aren't leaving or going to Alexandria. They are using the streets of Alexandria as a short cut. Stop with the nonsense, it is what it is.

This is a heavily populated area with people dispersed in large geographic areas. You cannot convert these people to bike the 15-20 miles in one direction. Enough already.

I live and work in Alexandria near one of the locations a road diet was used a few years ago. The traffic is obscene now. I hate it.


Why should the priority in Alexandria road design be the people who drive through Alexandria from somewhere else to somewhere else, over people who live in Alexandria? Drivers will use the streets of Alexandria as a short cut if that works for them. So Alexandria should stop making it work for them.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 21:27     Subject: Re:Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

Anonymous wrote:

Sure. But most road lanes in Alexandria are very narrow, barely two lane roads in residential neighborhoods with minimal driveways and massive MD/Fairfax cut through traffic. Alexandria is not Bethesda or Fairfax. This is an Alexandria project.


If drivers are speeding on these very narrow, barely two-lane roads, then maybe the roads would benefit from being narrower.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 21:26     Subject: Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When should the convenience of a few bikers outweigh the safety and efficiency of the driving majority? Putting bike lanes on Seminary Rd. is a stupid idea.


I am the poster who is arguing about city priorities wrt traffic calming and safety. These types of comments are really not helpful to the conversation. We need to reduce the “driving majority”. You aren’t going to effectively argue against this road diet based on that. Focus on Alexandria’s backwards priorities, funding streams, shitty traffic analysis, the high ADT on Seminary, and lack of transparency re: Fire, police and hospital concerns. This road diet was not appropriate based available data and concerns regarding first responder access. And there are other, parallel roads that were much more appropriate for a road diet and provided higher connectivity. The fact is, this road was more about winning a battle than the appropriate allocation of road space. The prior, wholly dismissive poster I am debating with, who clearly knows nothing about this project, and isn’t from Alexandria, is an example of those who just want to win.


First-responder access benefits from traffic-calmed roads.

It's also possible to build first-responder access into bike lanes. Other places do it.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 20:22     Subject: Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

I believe the percentage I read on one of the articles was that at least 40% of traffic driving through Alexandria were people passing through, people who's trip neither commenced nor would end in Alexandria, point A and point B were both somewhere else. Waze is kicking these drivers off 495/395/ GW Parkway/ Route 1 into the streets of Alexandria for their commutes or wherever it is they want to go. You are not going to efficiently reduce a "driving majority" by adding bike lanes and bigger sidewalks in Alexandria when almost 1/2 of the drivers in Alexandria aren't leaving or going to Alexandria. They are using the streets of Alexandria as a short cut. Stop with the nonsense, it is what it is.

This is a heavily populated area with people dispersed in large geographic areas. You cannot convert these people to bike the 15-20 miles in one direction. Enough already.

I live and work in Alexandria near one of the locations a road diet was used a few years ago. The traffic is obscene now. I hate it.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 19:52     Subject: Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

Anonymous wrote:When should the convenience of a few bikers outweigh the safety and efficiency of the driving majority? Putting bike lanes on Seminary Rd. is a stupid idea.


I am the poster who is arguing about city priorities wrt traffic calming and safety. These types of comments are really not helpful to the conversation. We need to reduce the “driving majority”. You aren’t going to effectively argue against this road diet based on that. Focus on Alexandria’s backwards priorities, funding streams, shitty traffic analysis, the high ADT on Seminary, and lack of transparency re: Fire, police and hospital concerns. This road diet was not appropriate based available data and concerns regarding first responder access. And there are other, parallel roads that were much more appropriate for a road diet and provided higher connectivity. The fact is, this road was more about winning a battle than the appropriate allocation of road space. The prior, wholly dismissive poster I am debating with, who clearly knows nothing about this project, and isn’t from Alexandria, is an example of those who just want to win.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 19:43     Subject: Re:Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

I am not really sure what your point is. Not all streets can fit bike lanes. In fact, most cannot. Those areas need and require other forms of traffic calming.


What kinds of streets that require traffic calming can't fit bike lanes? Especially since making general-travel lanes narrower is a well-established method for traffic calming.


Well then you know more than Alexandria city staff. Congratulations!


It's really not an issue of knowing more. It's an issue of being willing to reallocate road space.

Here's some information from the federal government about traffic calming, including reduction in lane width: https://www.transportation.gov/mission/health/Traffic-Calming-to-Slow-Vehicle-Speeds


^^^Just like, after the Churchill High School student was killed in July on 6-lane Old Georgetown Rd, lots of people said that there was no room for wider sidewalks or protected bike lanes. But there is, if you reallocate 1 lane each way to a wider sidewalk and a protected bike lane. Or you could even make more room by reallocating 1 lane each way and narrowing the remaining 2 lanes each way.


Sure. But most road lanes in Alexandria are very narrow, barely two lane roads in residential neighborhoods with minimal driveways and massive MD/Fairfax cut through traffic. Alexandria is not Bethesda or Fairfax. This is an Alexandria project.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 19:09     Subject: Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

Anonymous wrote:I have seen many fender benders on Seminary when people attempt to turn onto side streets like Fairbanks Ave. What is needed is a dedicated turn lane - not a bike lane.


Good news! The Seminary Road road diet includes a dedicated center turn lane.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 19:08     Subject: Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

Anonymous wrote:When should the convenience of a few bikers outweigh the safety and efficiency of the driving majority? Putting bike lanes on Seminary Rd. is a stupid idea.


If only we'd used that reasoning when people started driving cars on the roads. E.g., "When should the convenience of a few drivers outweigh the safety and efficiency of the horse-carriage-ing, streetcar-ing, walking, and biking majority? Allowing cars on the roads is a stupid idea."
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 18:59     Subject: Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

I have seen many fender benders on Seminary when people attempt to turn onto side streets like Fairbanks Ave. What is needed is a dedicated turn lane - not a bike lane.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 18:56     Subject: Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

When should the convenience of a few bikers outweigh the safety and efficiency of the driving majority? Putting bike lanes on Seminary Rd. is a stupid idea.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 18:01     Subject: Re:Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

I am not really sure what your point is. Not all streets can fit bike lanes. In fact, most cannot. Those areas need and require other forms of traffic calming.


What kinds of streets that require traffic calming can't fit bike lanes? Especially since making general-travel lanes narrower is a well-established method for traffic calming.


Well then you know more than Alexandria city staff. Congratulations!


It's really not an issue of knowing more. It's an issue of being willing to reallocate road space.

Here's some information from the federal government about traffic calming, including reduction in lane width: https://www.transportation.gov/mission/health/Traffic-Calming-to-Slow-Vehicle-Speeds


^^^Just like, after the Churchill High School student was killed in July on 6-lane Old Georgetown Rd, lots of people said that there was no room for wider sidewalks or protected bike lanes. But there is, if you reallocate 1 lane each way to a wider sidewalk and a protected bike lane. Or you could even make more room by reallocating 1 lane each way and narrowing the remaining 2 lanes each way.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 17:53     Subject: Re:Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

I am not really sure what your point is. Not all streets can fit bike lanes. In fact, most cannot. Those areas need and require other forms of traffic calming.


What kinds of streets that require traffic calming can't fit bike lanes? Especially since making general-travel lanes narrower is a well-established method for traffic calming.


Well then you know more than Alexandria city staff. Congratulations!


It's really not an issue of knowing more. It's an issue of being willing to reallocate road space.

Here's some information from the federal government about traffic calming, including reduction in lane width: https://www.transportation.gov/mission/health/Traffic-Calming-to-Slow-Vehicle-Speeds
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2019 17:17     Subject: Re:Alexandria Bike Lobby wins again

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

I am not really sure what your point is. Not all streets can fit bike lanes. In fact, most cannot. Those areas need and require other forms of traffic calming.


What kinds of streets that require traffic calming can't fit bike lanes? Especially since making general-travel lanes narrower is a well-established method for traffic calming.


Well then you know more than Alexandria city staff. Congratulations!