Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More people helps the economy. Will make these cities wealthier in the long run.

Why don't Liberals (in sanctuary cities) want migrants coming???

Anyone?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes please, let's hear the policy rationale for transporting asylum seekers halfway across the country and dropping them off on a random street corner in San Francisco.

We already transport them from the centers. Some are in California, some are in Texas/New Mexico. They are then moved all over the country. Why not put them in towns/cities where voters want them?

Dropping them off on a random street corner in the middle of the night was what was proposed

On a sanctuary. Perfect.

Good to know. At least y'all have finally admitted that you don't care about illegal immigration or any of the other claptrap that comes out yall's mouth. All that matters to you is hate and "sticking it to the libs".

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I agree with Trump sticking it to the libs. It shows thei hypocrisy of the sanctuary city and resist policies.

OK - thank you for finally answering.

Dp. He is putting their money where their mouth is. I honestly do not understand this backlash.

What if Obama sat in his office with his advisors plotting various ways to punish Republicans. Think that's OK for him to do as POTUS?

As stated before I'd be perfectly fine with allowing anyone with a gun in places that dont want gun restrictions while keeping restrictions in liberal areas. I think people should have to live with the policies they advocate for.

So it's totally fine if Obama and his advisors were sitting around trying to find ways to PUNISH Republicans. You'd be totally fine with that? Fully support it? Think it's patriotic and presidential? Completely A-OK?

So you would be Okay for a Democratic president to:

- Take away social security from red states
- Take away ACA from red states
- Take away Medicare from Red States
- Fight tooth and nail to take away disaster relief from red states
- If universal healthcare is implemented, to make it available only in blue states
- if free college plan is implemented, to make it available only in blue states?
- pay for infrastructure improvement only in blue states

In a nutshell, you would be okay for a Democratic president to look out for the welfare of the Blue States and stick it to the red states?

Trump isn’t taking anything from you. He’s fulfilling one of your political platforms.

You should thank him.

You are intellectually dishonest to pretend not to understand I am alluding to.

They are amoral scum. What do you expect?

Anonymous wrote:Democrats believe immigration is not just a problem to be solved, it is a defining aspect of the American character and our shared history.”

-Democratic Party Platform

Democrats are fighting for every immigrant who feels threatened by Donald Trump’s election. We will not stand by and watch families be torn apart — Democrats in Congress and in states and cities across the country are already standing up to Trump’s hatred and bigotry to defend their immigrant neighbors.

Thanks to President Obama, hundreds of thousands of DREAMers have been able to receive a temporary status that allows them to study, work, pay taxes, and contribute to the communities they grew up in. His administration has made a tremendous difference by prioritizing immigration enforcement so that it is focused on those with criminal records and doesn’t arbitrarily separate families, and Democrats are fighting to protect that progress.

Democrats will continue to work toward comprehensive immigration reform that fixes our nation’s broken immigration system, improves border security, prioritizes enforcement so we are targeting criminals – not families, keeps families together, and strengthens our economy.

Democrats know the importance of our country’s history as a nation of immigrants. We honor our fundamental values by treating all people who come to the United States with dignity and respect, and we always seek to embrace — not to to attack — immigrants.

https://democrats.org/issues/immigration-reform/

"Democrats will continue to work toward comprehensive immigration reform that fixes our nation’s broken immigration system, improves border security"

Yup.

Anonymous wrote:Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
·
2h
Replying to
@realDonaldTrump
....The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy – so this should make them very happy!

+1

And he's a big f$cking liar. Funny that you believe him. Again and again.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/27/us/politics/fast-check-donald-trump-democrats-open-borders.html

"President Trump has falsely claimed at least two dozen times since taking office that Democrats want to open American borders. But legislation shows that Democrats support border security measures, though not the border wall he wants to build."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not punishment. It’s what liberals advocate for.

+1

Liberals: Why is this punishment to you?

You march and post and protest to have illegals come here. Why is bringing them to sanctuary punishment?

Because Trump is bringing them? False. They brought themselves. Trump just needs a place to put them.

Don’t be stingy. They will just need housing, medical care, schools, food, and jobs. You’ve got them in your blue vibrant cities.

I think it was INTENDED as a punishment because Miller and Trump called it a punishment.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I agree with Trump sticking it to the libs. It shows thei hypocrisy of the sanctuary city and resist policies.

OK - thank you for finally answering.

Dp. He is putting their money where their mouth is. I honestly do not understand this backlash.

What if Obama sat in his office with his advisors plotting various ways to punish Republicans. Think that's OK for him to do as POTUS?

As stated before I'd be perfectly fine with allowing anyone with a gun in places that dont want gun restrictions while keeping restrictions in liberal areas. I think people should have to live with the policies they advocate for.

So it's totally fine if Obama and his advisors were sitting around trying to find ways to PUNISH Republicans. You'd be totally fine with that? Fully support it? Think it's patriotic and presidential? Completely A-OK?

Can you read? Why are you asking the same thing again? I'm not repeating myself.

Just trying to be clear. You fully support POTUS plotting to "punish" members of opposing political parties. Got it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I agree with Trump sticking it to the libs. It shows thei hypocrisy of the sanctuary city and resist policies.

OK - thank you for finally answering.

Dp. He is putting their money where their mouth is. I honestly do not understand this backlash.

What if Obama sat in his office with his advisors plotting various ways to punish Republicans. Think that's OK for him to do as POTUS?

As stated before I'd be perfectly fine with allowing anyone with a gun in places that dont want gun restrictions while keeping restrictions in liberal areas. I think people should have to live with the policies they advocate for.

So it's totally fine if Obama and his advisors were sitting around trying to find ways to PUNISH Republicans. You'd be totally fine with that? Fully support it? Think it's patriotic and presidential? Completely A-OK?

So you would be Okay for a Democratic president to:

- Take away social security from red states
- Take away ACA from red states
- Take away Medicare from Red States
- Fight tooth and nail to take away disaster relief from red states
- If universal healthcare is implemented, to make it available only in blue states
- if free college plan is implemented, to make it available only in blue states?
- pay for infrastructure improvement only in blue states

In a nutshell, you would be okay for a Democratic president to look out for the welfare of the Blue States and stick it to the red states?

For the last time. YES.

I would be okay with all of those. If red states dont want government assistance or healthcare options while having gun nuts on the loose, then yes I fully support that. And I still think these people should be dropped right in the middle of sanctuary cities.

In that case, I am perfectly fine with Trump implementing his spiteful policies. Hopefully this would ensure us to elect a Blue State president in 2020!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I agree with Trump sticking it to the libs. It shows thei hypocrisy of the sanctuary city and resist policies.

OK - thank you for finally answering.

Dp. He is putting their money where their mouth is. I honestly do not understand this backlash.

What if Obama sat in his office with his advisors plotting various ways to punish Republicans. Think that's OK for him to do as POTUS?

As stated before I'd be perfectly fine with allowing anyone with a gun in places that dont want gun restrictions while keeping restrictions in liberal areas. I think people should have to live with the policies they advocate for.

So it's totally fine if Obama and his advisors were sitting around trying to find ways to PUNISH Republicans. You'd be totally fine with that? Fully support it? Think it's patriotic and presidential? Completely A-OK?

So you would be Okay for a Democratic president to:

- Take away social security from red states
- Take away ACA from red states
- Take away Medicare from Red States
- Fight tooth and nail to take away disaster relief from red states
- If universal healthcare is implemented, to make it available only in blue states
- if free college plan is implemented, to make it available only in blue states?
- pay for infrastructure improvement only in blue states

In a nutshell, you would be okay for a Democratic president to look out for the welfare of the Blue States and stick it to the red states?

Trump isn’t taking anything from you. He’s fulfilling one of your political platforms.

You should thank him.

You are intellectually dishonest to pretend not to understand I am alluding to.

You allude because you don’t want to openly state that illegal immigrants overwhelmingly take from community resources and don’t pay their way.

You want everyone else to bear the burden.

Time to shine. Time to bare the burden. No more cages! Sanctuary! Think of the children that can be with their parents!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I agree with Trump sticking it to the libs. It shows thei hypocrisy of the sanctuary city and resist policies.

OK - thank you for finally answering.

Dp. He is putting their money where their mouth is. I honestly do not understand this backlash.

What if Obama sat in his office with his advisors plotting various ways to punish Republicans. Think that's OK for him to do as POTUS?

As stated before I'd be perfectly fine with allowing anyone with a gun in places that dont want gun restrictions while keeping restrictions in liberal areas. I think people should have to live with the policies they advocate for.

So it's totally fine if Obama and his advisors were sitting around trying to find ways to PUNISH Republicans. You'd be totally fine with that? Fully support it? Think it's patriotic and presidential? Completely A-OK?

So you would be Okay for a Democratic president to:

- Take away social security from red states
- Take away ACA from red states
- Take away Medicare from Red States
- Fight tooth and nail to take away disaster relief from red states
- If universal healthcare is implemented, to make it available only in blue states
- if free college plan is implemented, to make it available only in blue states?
- pay for infrastructure improvement only in blue states

In a nutshell, you would be okay for a Democratic president to look out for the welfare of the Blue States and stick it to the red states?

Except conservatives don't want to lose social security - they want to know it will be fully funded
they want affordable health care or a vastly improved ACA
And the rest follow along.
Sanctuary cities have advocated for non-participation in federal enforcement of immigration laws. Republicans aren't advocating for bad health care, social security and better roads or lower tuition costs.

Sanctuary cities are also paying for illegal immigrants' lawyers so they can stay. They want the people there. Why not give them to those places?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes please, let's hear the policy rationale for transporting asylum seekers halfway across the country and dropping them off on a random street corner in San Francisco.

We already transport them from the centers. Some are in California, some are in Texas/New Mexico. They are then moved all over the country. Why not put them in towns/cities where voters want them?

Dropping them off on a random street corner in the middle of the night was what was proposed

On a sanctuary. Perfect.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I agree with Trump sticking it to the libs. It shows thei hypocrisy of the sanctuary city and resist policies.

OK - thank you for finally answering.

Dp. He is putting their money where their mouth is. I honestly do not understand this backlash.

What if Obama sat in his office with his advisors plotting various ways to punish Republicans. Think that's OK for him to do as POTUS?

As stated before I'd be perfectly fine with allowing anyone with a gun in places that dont want gun restrictions while keeping restrictions in liberal areas. I think people should have to live with the policies they advocate for.

So it's totally fine if Obama and his advisors were sitting around trying to find ways to PUNISH Republicans. You'd be totally fine with that? Fully support it? Think it's patriotic and presidential? Completely A-OK?

So you would be Okay for a Democratic president to:

- Take away social security from red states
- Take away ACA from red states
- Take away Medicare from Red States
- Fight tooth and nail to take away disaster relief from red states
- If universal healthcare is implemented, to make it available only in blue states
- if free college plan is implemented, to make it available only in blue states?
- pay for infrastructure improvement only in blue states

In a nutshell, you would be okay for a Democratic president to look out for the welfare of the Blue States and stick it to the red states?

Trump isn’t taking anything from you. He’s fulfilling one of your political platforms.

You should thank him.

You are intellectually dishonest to pretend not to understand I am alluding to.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I agree with Trump sticking it to the libs. It shows thei hypocrisy of the sanctuary city and resist policies.

OK - thank you for finally answering.

Dp. He is putting their money where their mouth is. I honestly do not understand this backlash.

What if Obama sat in his office with his advisors plotting various ways to punish Republicans. Think that's OK for him to do as POTUS?

As stated before I'd be perfectly fine with allowing anyone with a gun in places that dont want gun restrictions while keeping restrictions in liberal areas. I think people should have to live with the policies they advocate for.

So it's totally fine if Obama and his advisors were sitting around trying to find ways to PUNISH Republicans. You'd be totally fine with that? Fully support it? Think it's patriotic and presidential? Completely A-OK?

So you would be Okay for a Democratic president to:

- Take away social security from red states
- Take away ACA from red states
- Take away Medicare from Red States
- Fight tooth and nail to take away disaster relief from red states
- If universal healthcare is implemented, to make it available only in blue states
- if free college plan is implemented, to make it available only in blue states?
- pay for infrastructure improvement only in blue states

In a nutshell, you would be okay for a Democratic president to look out for the welfare of the Blue States and stick it to the red states?

For the last time. YES.

I would be okay with all of those. If red states dont want government assistance or healthcare options while having gun nuts on the loose, then yes I fully support that. And I still think these people should be dropped right in the middle of sanctuary cities.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I agree with Trump sticking it to the libs. It shows thei hypocrisy of the sanctuary city and resist policies.

OK - thank you for finally answering.

Dp. He is putting their money where their mouth is. I honestly do not understand this backlash.

What if Obama sat in his office with his advisors plotting various ways to punish Republicans. Think that's OK for him to do as POTUS?

As stated before I'd be perfectly fine with allowing anyone with a gun in places that dont want gun restrictions while keeping restrictions in liberal areas. I think people should have to live with the policies they advocate for.

So it's totally fine if Obama and his advisors were sitting around trying to find ways to PUNISH Republicans. You'd be totally fine with that? Fully support it? Think it's patriotic and presidential? Completely A-OK?

So you would be Okay for a Democratic president to:

- Take away social security from red states
- Take away ACA from red states
- Take away Medicare from Red States
- Fight tooth and nail to take away disaster relief from red states
- If universal healthcare is implemented, to make it available only in blue states
- if free college plan is implemented, to make it available only in blue states?
- pay for infrastructure improvement only in blue states

In a nutshell, you would be okay for a Democratic president to look out for the welfare of the Blue States and stick it to the red states?

Except conservatives don't want to lose social security - they want to know it will be fully funded
they want affordable health care or a vastly improved ACA
And the rest follow along.
Sanctuary cities have advocated for non-participation in federal enforcement of immigration laws. Republicans aren't advocating for bad health care, social security and better roads or lower tuition costs.

Democrats believe immigration is not just a problem to be solved, it is a defining aspect of the American character and our shared history.”

-Democratic Party Platform

Democrats are fighting for every immigrant who feels threatened by Donald Trump’s election. We will not stand by and watch families be torn apart — Democrats in Congress and in states and cities across the country are already standing up to Trump’s hatred and bigotry to defend their immigrant neighbors.

Thanks to President Obama, hundreds of thousands of DREAMers have been able to receive a temporary status that allows them to study, work, pay taxes, and contribute to the communities they grew up in. His administration has made a tremendous difference by prioritizing immigration enforcement so that it is focused on those with criminal records and doesn’t arbitrarily separate families, and Democrats are fighting to protect that progress.

Democrats will continue to work toward comprehensive immigration reform that fixes our nation’s broken immigration system, improves border security, prioritizes enforcement so we are targeting criminals – not families, keeps families together, and strengthens our economy.

Democrats know the importance of our country’s history as a nation of immigrants. We honor our fundamental values by treating all people who come to the United States with dignity and respect, and we always seek to embrace — not to to attack — immigrants.

https://democrats.org/issues/immigration-reform/