Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kate will be Queen Consort and the mother of the Prince of Wales someday and Meghan will only be a Duchess. Rose won’t even be a footnote.
I’m sure that’s what they said about Diana, Camilla, and Sarah.
Thirty years later Diana is still not Queen, also dead, and divorced. Also not a mother of a King.
Camilla is the future Queen, alive and on the arm of the Prince of Wales.
Sarah is a cheater and laughingstock but accepted by the Royals.
If Diana had not divorced Charles, she would be Queen Consort and alive. Kate came into the marriage much more mature and prepared than 19 year old Shy Di.
Diana didn’t divorce Charles. HE divorced her and stripped her of everything. She begged him to stop seeing Camilla, treating her like a fool (inviting Diana to dinner with Camilla and Camilla’s husband), and be a good husband.
He couldn’t or wouldn’t. The compulsion was too strong.
Also, she was crazy.
I keep reading here that Diana was crazy, but I was too young to really have any idea what she was actually like. How was she crazy?
Anonymous wrote:He would cheat on gorgeous Kate with that hag?
Yeah right.
Anonymous wrote:Remember at the polo match, when Kate was running and running in her dress, and you think she's going to go greet Will? And she greets some other guy standing next to him? Practically blushing?
Get you some, kate!
Anonymous wrote:Remember at the polo match, when Kate was running and running in her dress, and you think she's going to go greet Will? And she greets some other guy standing next to him? Practically blushing?
Get you some, kate!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if William does cheat what's Kate going to do?
Ignore it like a lot of British noblewomen do. One of my favorite ones - Lord Brabourne, Earl Mountbatten Of Burma (Prince Phillip’s nephew).
He decided to have an affair with a woman in the Bahamas - Lady Nuttal. Left his wife in 2010 for the island, didn’t come back until 2014!!
His wife stayed married but the sour expression on her face reminds me of Kate. And his daughter was so mad she refused to let him walk her down the aisle in 2016.
![]()
Is this the one where Prince Charles gave the bride away?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if William does cheat what's Kate going to do?
Ignore it like a lot of British noblewomen do. One of my favorite ones - Lord Brabourne, Earl Mountbatten Of Burma (Prince Phillip’s nephew).
He decided to have an affair with a woman in the Bahamas - Lady Nuttal. Left his wife in 2010 for the island, didn’t come back until 2014!!
His wife stayed married but the sour expression on her face reminds me of Kate. And his daughter was so mad she refused to let him walk her down the aisle in 2016.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lainey’s cool gossip trick and intuition includes making leaps. I said it! That’s a good thing and a bad thing.
I’ve seen her make leaps that are genius. And I’ve seen her makes leaps that are wrong or obviously biased.
Going back to the gossip and the intuitive/leaping detective work
So the story originates with Kate saying something like “William (And/or staff member), we are going to limit our time with Rose’s family.” Or something of the sort. From there, who else was told?
Or is it all made up? (Why would someone make it up. That’s random and possible but not likely)
So if true, then WHO shared it? Staff member? No way.
William? ROSE? It is an other-woman thing to do to get cut off and take a little vengeance.
Ok, I’m leaping. I still don’t believe it’s true based on... who released info that Kate is cutting them off?
Additionally, if true, couldn’t it be about:
-rose And David propped them on swinging, and it’s not to their taste?
-one of the little boys is a bully?
-rose sexted Will?
-rose publicly followed GARY JANETTI? (I made this up, don’t know if that’s true ha ha)
-rose insulted Kate or was caught on WhatsApp making fun
-many other reasons one would phase out a friend
Ugh, I just don’t think Giles Coren knows anything.
I don’t think it’s over the kids. You don’t ice out the highest ranking second family in your social set over a toddler spat. Especially all five of the boys will see each other at Eton anyway.
No, it’s personal.
I can tell .. you don’t have kids?
You DO ice out people over kids. You especially do if its about the kids. Who else will protect them? Esp a vulnerable little future king...
DP. I have kids and think this is crazy.
Cool for you. On this board you probably have a 50-50 chance of coming across parents who wouldn’t or would ice out friends for their kids sake.
I’ve done it in a minor way. Boy (with lots of older brothers) shows his penis to my daughter in the bathroom. Yep, ill be nice, and I’ll let that one go, but it’s rare if you’d see me allowing play dates after that.
There is a difference between declining playdates and not allowing unsupervised play and icing out a family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lainey’s cool gossip trick and intuition includes making leaps. I said it! That’s a good thing and a bad thing.
I’ve seen her make leaps that are genius. And I’ve seen her makes leaps that are wrong or obviously biased.
Going back to the gossip and the intuitive/leaping detective work
So the story originates with Kate saying something like “William (And/or staff member), we are going to limit our time with Rose’s family.” Or something of the sort. From there, who else was told?
Or is it all made up? (Why would someone make it up. That’s random and possible but not likely)
So if true, then WHO shared it? Staff member? No way.
William? ROSE? It is an other-woman thing to do to get cut off and take a little vengeance.
Ok, I’m leaping. I still don’t believe it’s true based on... who released info that Kate is cutting them off?
Additionally, if true, couldn’t it be about:
-rose And David propped them on swinging, and it’s not to their taste?
-one of the little boys is a bully?
-rose sexted Will?
-rose publicly followed GARY JANETTI? (I made this up, don’t know if that’s true ha ha)
-rose insulted Kate or was caught on WhatsApp making fun
-many other reasons one would phase out a friend
Ugh, I just don’t think Giles Coren knows anything.
I don’t think it’s over the kids. You don’t ice out the highest ranking second family in your social set over a toddler spat. Especially all five of the boys will see each other at Eton anyway.
No, it’s personal.
I can tell .. you don’t have kids?
You DO ice out people over kids. You especially do if its about the kids. Who else will protect them? Esp a vulnerable little future king...
DP. I have kids and think this is crazy.
Cool for you. On this board you probably have a 50-50 chance of coming across parents who wouldn’t or would ice out friends for their kids sake.
I’ve done it in a minor way. Boy (with lots of older brothers) shows his penis to my daughter in the bathroom. Yep, ill be nice, and I’ll let that one go, but it’s rare if you’d see me allowing play dates after that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the age of social media. No person now gets away with cheating as easily as Charles did. If Will is stupid enough to do that then there will be either outrage in the media, or Kate can play the field too. In any case, the kids will suffer and the public will wonder why there needs to be a monarchy. So it is entirely up to Will to do the right thing.
The third kid was a mistake for Will and Kate, even though they have a team of nannies.
Why was #3 a mistake?
RE the social media thing, I think the palaces think they can keep a lid on it and it they can’t. They contacted two separate reporters to take down allegations on Twitter re the affair.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lainey’s cool gossip trick and intuition includes making leaps. I said it! That’s a good thing and a bad thing.
I’ve seen her make leaps that are genius. And I’ve seen her makes leaps that are wrong or obviously biased.
Going back to the gossip and the intuitive/leaping detective work
So the story originates with Kate saying something like “William (And/or staff member), we are going to limit our time with Rose’s family.” Or something of the sort. From there, who else was told?
Or is it all made up? (Why would someone make it up. That’s random and possible but not likely)
So if true, then WHO shared it? Staff member? No way.
William? ROSE? It is an other-woman thing to do to get cut off and take a little vengeance.
Ok, I’m leaping. I still don’t believe it’s true based on... who released info that Kate is cutting them off?
Additionally, if true, couldn’t it be about:
-rose And David propped them on swinging, and it’s not to their taste?
-one of the little boys is a bully?
-rose sexted Will?
-rose publicly followed GARY JANETTI? (I made this up, don’t know if that’s true ha ha)
-rose insulted Kate or was caught on WhatsApp making fun
-many other reasons one would phase out a friend
Ugh, I just don’t think Giles Coren knows anything.
I don’t think it’s over the kids. You don’t ice out the highest ranking second family in your social set over a toddler spat. Especially all five of the boys will see each other at Eton anyway.
No, it’s personal.
I can tell .. you don’t have kids?
You DO ice out people over kids. You especially do if its about the kids. Who else will protect them? Esp a vulnerable little future king...
DP. I have kids and think this is crazy.
Anonymous wrote:This is the age of social media. No person now gets away with cheating as easily as Charles did. If Will is stupid enough to do that then there will be either outrage in the media, or Kate can play the field too. In any case, the kids will suffer and the public will wonder why there needs to be a monarchy. So it is entirely up to Will to do the right thing.
The third kid was a mistake for Will and Kate, even though they have a team of nannies.