Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker looks younger than he is. His kids are adults or very close to being adults.

I watched him since he was in CNN Crossfire. He is interesting and unpredictable and not really all that partisan. Most people commenting here have obviously never watched his show. This is not Hannity or Ingraham or Rush. Most of the time he argues with the opposing side and often, he loses.

That is true of the old Tucker. Not the one who sold his soul to take over O'Reily's hour. I used to think just as you did about Tucker but his current show is just blatant propaganda. I hope the bajillions of dollars he's making are worth it.

I'm sometimes more disgusted with him than Ingraham and Hannity actually because I think they are just terrible people and true believers. Tucker I know, deep down, knows how effing insane all this is and has decided the paycheck is worth being complicit.

Please share some quotes of Carlson's "blatant propaganda". Thank you!

First, you'd have to ask the liberal how he defines "blatant propoganda." I imagine it's "opinions I disagree with."

Well first I am a woman. Second I would love to sit down with you guys and watch Tucker Carlson and talk to you about how I think he rhetorically manipulates his audience pretty shamelessly.

He asks extraordinarily leading questions designed not to actually hear something from his guest, but to tell something to his audience via the question. IE, he doesn't ask, 'how do you feel about illegal immigration guest?' he will instead say, 'but aren't you worried about murdering gang members infecting our schools and swarming across the border?'

That is not journalism, it is an expert spreading of fear and dishonestly. So yes I disagree with his opinions. But more than that I disagree with his dishonest and deceptive messaging tactics that are designed to humiliate/cut down his guests and to spread his opinions not via good faith sharing of ideas, but through insidious rhetorical tricks on his show.

And worst of all, I don't think he believes them all, so he's using his powers not just for things he believes in, but for the Trump administration. You know that every time a huge trump story breaks and when you tune into Tucker he's talking about some mexican who assaulted someone in LA that they have no information on. Bad news about Trump? Won't cover it but WILL continue to spread his message of fear to reinforce the base's feelings that they need to stand by Trump despite whatever the bad news story is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Mrs. Carlson was home alone when the alt-left antifa criminals were trying to break down her front door to attack her.

Antifa is far-right. No government = extreme conservatism.

Nice attempt, but WRONG. Even the liberally biased CNN reports them as far-left extremists:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/08/media/tucker-carlson-protestors/index.html

Thank you, CNN, for the spotlight on the radical alt-left Antifa. They are crazed Marxists.

Fear them if they come for you. They'll bash your face and Democrat-controlled police departments will let them. Mrs. Carlson is lucky to be alive.

Yes. And what I want to know is.....did the police show up and arrest the thugs? tucker said she barricaded herself and called 911.

Did they show up? Do they have the alt-left radicals in custody?

Also, Tucker debates with some real hateful leftists on his show. Is it possible one of them was in that crowd?

Apparently there's some extreme radical professor who was a guest. After the outrageous comments he made on Tucker's show, the college fired him. I think they're trying to punish Tucker by coming after his family. Sick, sick, sick.

The Democrats have unleashed some real crazies out there. Hope they don't kill more people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker looks younger than he is. His kids are adults or very close to being adults.

I watched him since he was in CNN Crossfire. He is interesting and unpredictable and not really all that partisan. Most people commenting here have obviously never watched his show. This is not Hannity or Ingraham or Rush. Most of the time he argues with the opposing side and often, he loses.

That is true of the old Tucker. Not the one who sold his soul to take over O'Reily's hour. I used to think just as you did about Tucker but his current show is just blatant propaganda. I hope the bajillions of dollars he's making are worth it.

I'm sometimes more disgusted with him than Ingraham and Hannity actually because I think they are just terrible people and true believers. Tucker I know, deep down, knows how effing insane all this is and has decided the paycheck is worth being complicit.

Please share some quotes of Carlson's "blatant propaganda". Thank you!

First, you'd have to ask the liberal how he defines "blatant propoganda." I imagine it's "opinions I disagree with."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Terrible.
I know this is a small minority of activists but their behavior should be called out. People should not be accosted in restaurants, in their homes or when they are “off the clock”

That’s not how it works. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

So you're fine with terrorizing children, as long as they're conservatives' children?

Tucker’s kids aren’t really children - all are older than 15. Plus, they aren’t even home. They are away at boarding school(s) and college(s).

Ok, then. It's OK to terrorize conservatives' children as long as they are at least 16? Do you have a limit on the other end? OK to terrorize elderly as long as they are under 85?

Why is it acceptable to terrorize anyone?

No one on this thread has said this is “ok.”

Some of us don’t really care, because Tucker is sort of vile. But we welcome police investigating and enforcing the law in this case.

Wrong. Plenty of you have shown your true colors and very much said this is "ok." As if there was ever any doubt.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Mrs. Carlson was home alone when the alt-left antifa criminals were trying to break down her front door to attack her.

Antifa is far-right. No government = extreme conservatism.

Nice attempt, but WRONG. Even the liberally biased CNN reports them as far-left extremists:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/08/media/tucker-carlson-protestors/index.html

Thank you, CNN, for the spotlight on the radical alt-left Antifa. They are crazed Marxists.

Fear them if they come for you. They'll bash your face and Democrat-controlled police departments will let them. Mrs. Carlson is lucky to be alive.

Yes. And what I want to know is.....did the police show up and arrest the thugs? tucker said she barricaded herself and called 911.

Did they show up? Do they have the alt-left radicals in custody?

Also, Tucker debates with some real hateful leftists on his show. Is it possible one of them was in that crowd?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

So you're fine with terrorizing children, as long as they're conservatives' children?

Tucker’s kids aren’t really children - all are older than 15. Plus, they aren’t even home. They are away at boarding school(s) and college(s).

Ok, then. It's OK to terrorize conservatives' children as long as they are at least 16? Do you have a limit on the other end? OK to terrorize elderly as long as they are under 85?

Why is it acceptable to terrorize anyone?

No one on this thread has said this is “ok.”

Some of us don’t really care, because Tucker is sort of vile. But we welcome police investigating and enforcing the law in this case.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker looks younger than he is. His kids are adults or very close to being adults.

I watched him since he was in CNN Crossfire. He is interesting and unpredictable and not really all that partisan. Most people commenting here have obviously never watched his show. This is not Hannity or Ingraham or Rush. Most of the time he argues with the opposing side and often, he loses.

That is true of the old Tucker. Not the one who sold his soul to take over O'Reily's hour. I used to think just as you did about Tucker but his current show is just blatant propaganda. I hope the bajillions of dollars he's making are worth it.

I'm sometimes more disgusted with him than Ingraham and Hannity actually because I think they are just terrible people and true believers. Tucker I know, deep down, knows how effing insane all this is and has decided the paycheck is worth being complicit.

Please share some quotes of Carlson's "blatant propaganda". Thank you!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Mrs. Carlson was home alone when the alt-left antifa criminals were trying to break down her front door to attack her.

Antifa is far-right. No government = extreme conservatism.

Nice attempt, but WRONG. Even the liberally biased CNN reports them as far-left extremists:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/08/media/tucker-carlson-protestors/index.html

Thank you, CNN, for the spotlight on the radical alt-left Antifa. They are crazed Marxists.

Fear them if they come for you. They'll bash your face and Democrat-controlled police departments will let them. Mrs. Carlson is lucky to be alive.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Mrs. Carlson was home alone when the alt-left antifa criminals were trying to break down her front door to attack her.

Antifa is far-right. No government = extreme conservatism.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker looks younger than he is. His kids are adults or very close to being adults.

I watched him since he was in CNN Crossfire. He is interesting and unpredictable and not really all that partisan. Most people commenting here have obviously never watched his show. This is not Hannity or Ingraham or Rush. Most of the time he argues with the opposing side and often, he loses.

That is true of the old Tucker. Not the one who sold his soul to take over O'Reily's hour. I used to think just as you did about Tucker but his current show is just blatant propaganda. I hope the bajillions of dollars he's making are worth it.

I'm sometimes more disgusted with him than Ingraham and Hannity actually because I think they are just terrible people and true believers. Tucker I know, deep down, knows how effing insane all this is and has decided the paycheck is worth being complicit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

So you're fine with terrorizing children, as long as they're conservatives' children?

Tucker’s kids aren’t really children - all are older than 15. Plus, they aren’t even home. They are away at boarding school(s) and college(s).

Ok, then. It's OK to terrorize conservatives' children as long as they are at least 16? Do you have a limit on the other end? OK to terrorize elderly as long as they are under 85?

Why is it acceptable to terrorize anyone?

No one on this thread has said this is “ok.”

Some of us don’t really care, because Tucker is sort of vile. But we welcome police investigating and enforcing the law in this case.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker is not on his show right now, but calling in (probably from home).

This really needs to be stopped. We cannot have the far-left extremists behaving this way.

+1 - Yet Bowser's Police Force made no arrests.

Why?

Yes. I assume Tucker's wife called the police. Cops should have been on the scene within a couple of minutes, taking the criminals into custody. Why didn't that happen?

Yes. The Mayor needs to be held ACCOUNTABLE for this FAILURE.

Do you live in DC. I do and don’t feel my tax dollars should be wasted on tv trolls who run their mouth. He says horrible things and must suffer the consequences. Sorry.

OMG. So people who express opinions with which you disagree should be assaulted?

What about the liberals? If some thugs started threatening Rachel Maddow or Joy Behar, should police leave them to be injured?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Mrs. Carlson was home alone when the alt-left antifa criminals were trying to break down her front door to attack her.

Antifa is far-right. No government = extreme conservatism.

Nice attempt, but WRONG. Even the liberally biased CNN reports them as far-left extremists:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/08/media/tucker-carlson-protestors/index.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because Tucker has never made claims or encouraged protestors/ conspiracy theorists/ angry online crazies to threaten liberal groups. He is not innocent whatsoever. What goes around comes around and I have no sympathy for people who dish it out but can’t take it no matter what their politics are.

So you're fine with terrorizing children, as long as they're conservatives' children?

Tucker’s kids aren’t really children - all are older than 15. Plus, they aren’t even home. They are away at boarding school(s) and college(s).

Ok, then. It's OK to terrorize conservatives' children as long as they are at least 16? Do you have a limit on the other end? OK to terrorize elderly as long as they are under 85?

Why is it acceptable to terrorize anyone?