Anonymous wrote:Do the same people who are beating their breasts about gun ownership inquire about what medications are kept in the home and whether there is a lock on the medicine cabinet? Whether a purse with a pill box is left in the open? Would you consider someone asking you what medications you’re on too intrusive? Because accidental ingestion and overdose of medications (yes, even innocently, not kids on heroin or anything) is a bigger problem for kids these days than an accidental shooting. You all are worried about the wrong pervasive problem here, and hypocrites to boot.
Anonymous wrote:if you haven't been to the house before/the family is new to you, do you ask whether there are guns? if the family has guns, do you still let your kid play at that house?
Anonymous wrote:Do the same people who are beating their breasts about gun ownership inquire about what medications are kept in the home and whether there is a lock on the medicine cabinet? Whether a purse with a pill box is left in the open? Would you consider someone asking you what medications you’re on too intrusive? Because accidental ingestion and overdose of medications (yes, even innocently, not kids on heroin or anything) is a bigger problem for kids these days than an accidental shooting. You all are worried about the wrong pervasive problem here, and hypocrites to boot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do not trust people who kill things for fun. There is something missing in their soul. I think people who are so afraid of the world that they make themselves less safe by having a gun in their home are dangerous plain and simple. It is not even remotely rational.
Everyone I know who hunts will eat what they kill. We're taking deer, turkey, pheasant, etc. People have about the local food movement and that's about as local as you can get. How is that any different from raising chickens and being a poultry farmer? What about those families who live in remote areas and need guns to protect themselves from coyotes? I'm pretty sure people out in Wyoming aren't going out on trail rides without a gun.
PPs comments show a gross misunderstanding about how people live. Not everyone is living in a town. We will never fix the issue of gun control if the debate continues to be an us vs. them conversation.
+1
All the hunters I know (I am not one) eat what they kill, and often use other parts of the bodies for things as well. Yes, people who go around shooting neighborhood cats and dogs for fun are psychopaths. And yes, those people exist. But your statements show how out of touch you are with so much of this country. And by lumping every single person who owns a gun into one group, all you're doing is a disservice to the progress of gun control. Of all the people I know who own guns, none of them would argue against stricter laws, registration, etc. These are the people you ought to want on your side, but you're ostracizing them. So well done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do not trust people who kill things for fun. There is something missing in their soul. I think people who are so afraid of the world that they make themselves less safe by having a gun in their home are dangerous plain and simple. It is not even remotely rational.
Everyone I know who hunts will eat what they kill. We're taking deer, turkey, pheasant, etc. People have about the local food movement and that's about as local as you can get. How is that any different from raising chickens and being a poultry farmer? What about those families who live in remote areas and need guns to protect themselves from coyotes? I'm pretty sure people out in Wyoming aren't going out on trail rides without a gun.
PPs comments show a gross misunderstanding about how people live. Not everyone is living in a town. We will never fix the issue of gun control if the debate continues to be an us vs. them conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What have a listserve and what we do is identify any address with a criminal domiciled and spread the word!
it all came about from a similar non-anonymous question on guns in homes, and it turned out the person advocating outing of firearms owners had a stepson with an assault record!
A list member who was it the PD identified that person, and we found that a number of us because of Human REosurces jobs or law enforcement jobs had access to databases with arrest records whihc in the US are public .
Half or more of country owns guns that is not the risk factor, the risk factor for violence, be it bating death, knife fightng or attack injuries or death, sexual attack -- is arrest records.
about 10% of DC has arrest records and those are 90% of people who commit murder. Know where they live. If a kids big brother or step father or mother's boyfriend has an arrest record OUT THEM so everyone knowns!
Actually less than half of Americans own guns: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/wonk/wp/2016/06/29/american-gun-ownership-is-now-at-a-30-year-low/. But the average gun owner owns 8 guns. Is it really so mysterious that the rest of us think gun owners comprise a high number of psychos? Who needs 8 guns? And let's be real: most of these people aren't well-educated and conscientious.
Why does the number matter, would you rather have a gun owner with 8 guns who keeps them responsibly secured in a safe or someone with just one who keeps it out lying around in arms reach?
The former, obviously. But the people who keep arsenals and own assault rifles and the like seem less likely to be responsible gun owners.
Anonymous wrote:I do not trust people who kill things for fun. There is something missing in their soul. I think people who are so afraid of the world that they make themselves less safe by having a gun in their home are dangerous plain and simple. It is not even remotely rational.
Anonymous wrote:I do not trust people who kill things for fun. There is something missing in their soul. I think people who are so afraid of the world that they make themselves less safe by having a gun in their home are dangerous plain and simple. It is not even remotely rational.
Anonymous wrote:^ This is 20:27. I should add that none of these people I know are buying guns to defend themselves against the government. That is insane.