Anonymous wrote:Decades ago the super rich to which these schools cater were fewer in numbers and less wealthy.
The other running theme in this thread is that Sidwell has changed, and not for the better. We may have to "get over it" as some will say, but it is narrowing the space between Sidwell and other local schools.
The "joy problem" to which Bryan Garman has referred is that he sees SFS as a less joyful place to be compared to when he was there as a teacher.
Anonymous wrote:And have you looked at the price increases for colleges? Just saying. Private education in general has taken a crazy turn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of us feel like the public schools (elementary especially) are focused entirely on getting at-risk and low income kids up to speed, and the private schools are increasingly out of reach.
I can't be the only MC/UMC mom who feels like there is no such thing as a developmentally-appropriate elementary school for a kid who is, and will always be, at or above grade level in all subjects, which I can afford and where that kid isn't going to be pacified with worksheets in his class of almost 30, at least for the few weeks of the year he isn't focused on testing.
There aren't any realistic choices if you're unhappy with your public schools. Advocating, volunteering, etc., doesn't reduce class sizes and doesn't change state and local mandates for testing, limiting recess, etc..
I don't want my kid bored all day and then to have an hour of tutoring in the afternoon. I am willing to pay for something else, but I don't have DMV money.
What is your local elementary school? Are you guessing or is your child actually there?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of us feel like the public schools (elementary especially) are focused entirely on getting at-risk and low income kids up to speed, and the private schools are increasingly out of reach.
I can't be the only MC/UMC mom who feels like there is no such thing as a developmentally-appropriate elementary school for a kid who is, and will always be, at or above grade level in all subjects, which I can afford and where that kid isn't going to be pacified with worksheets in his class of almost 30, at least for the few weeks of the year he isn't focused on testing.
There aren't any realistic choices if you're unhappy with your public schools. Advocating, volunteering, etc., doesn't reduce class sizes and doesn't change state and local mandates for testing, limiting recess, etc..
I don't want my kid bored all day and then to have an hour of tutoring in the afternoon. I am willing to pay for something else, but I don't have DMV money.
Sadly, there really isn't. That is why many are willing to sacrifice to send their kids to schools like Sidwell, even if it is a financial strain.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of us feel like the public schools (elementary especially) are focused entirely on getting at-risk and low income kids up to speed, and the private schools are increasingly out of reach.
I can't be the only MC/UMC mom who feels like there is no such thing as a developmentally-appropriate elementary school for a kid who is, and will always be, at or above grade level in all subjects, which I can afford and where that kid isn't going to be pacified with worksheets in his class of almost 30, at least for the few weeks of the year he isn't focused on testing.
There aren't any realistic choices if you're unhappy with your public schools. Advocating, volunteering, etc., doesn't reduce class sizes and doesn't change state and local mandates for testing, limiting recess, etc..
I don't want my kid bored all day and then to have an hour of tutoring in the afternoon. I am willing to pay for something else, but I don't have DMV money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have to admit I have stopped donating after all these yearly increases. I have no interest in contributing to the new unified school. It's a pay forward we will never see the benefit of and if anything it is a distraction.
So other people, decades ago, contributed money so your kid could have the faculty and campus that they enjoyed and you withhold for the future. That's lovely.
"Decades ago," it was a more modest school, with a (relatively) more modest plan and a sense that families would return to send their children.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that you care nothing about people who are actually paying is sad. This is why full pay parents are tired of the increases. You don't even get a good feeling of contributing to a greater good. When people get to a point where they dismiss people who are actually paying for them why then it is sad.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of us feel like the public schools (elementary especially) are focused entirely on getting at-risk and low income kids up to speed, and the private schools are increasingly out of reach.
I can't be the only MC/UMC mom who feels like there is no such thing as a developmentally-appropriate elementary school for a kid who is, and will always be, at or above grade level in all subjects, which I can afford and where that kid isn't going to be pacified with worksheets in his class of almost 30, at least for the few weeks of the year he isn't focused on testing.
There aren't any realistic choices if you're unhappy with your public schools. Advocating, volunteering, etc., doesn't reduce class sizes and doesn't change state and local mandates for testing, limiting recess, etc..
I don't want my kid bored all day and then to have an hour of tutoring in the afternoon. I am willing to pay for something else, but I don't have DMV money.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of us feel like the public schools (elementary especially) are focused entirely on getting at-risk and low income kids up to speed, and the private schools are increasingly out of reach.
I can't be the only MC/UMC mom who feels like there is no such thing as a developmentally-appropriate elementary school for a kid who is, and will always be, at or above grade level in all subjects, which I can afford and where that kid isn't going to be pacified with worksheets in his class of almost 30, at least for the few weeks of the year he isn't focused on testing.
There aren't any realistic choices if you're unhappy with your public schools. Advocating, volunteering, etc., doesn't reduce class sizes and doesn't change state and local mandates for testing, limiting recess, etc..
I don't want my kid bored all day and then to have an hour of tutoring in the afternoon. I am willing to pay for something else, but I don't have DMV money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have to admit I have stopped donating after all these yearly increases. I have no interest in contributing to the new unified school. It's a pay forward we will never see the benefit of and if anything it is a distraction.
So other people, decades ago, contributed money so your kid could have the faculty and campus that they enjoyed and you withhold for the future. That's lovely.
Anonymous wrote:I am also appalled at the yearly increase but I don't understand why every year there is a long discussion on Sidwell's increase and not the other schools. Are they released later? Is that why Sidwell always leads the pack for complaints.