Anonymous wrote:The actual stance of the Catholic Church opposes the death penalty.

And, "criminal baby"...Really?!?

I have long wondered at the "pro-choice" position of better off dead, than poor or in foster care, but never before have I heard someone give the death penalty to a fetus for crimes it has yet to commit.

First, the Catholic Church's anti-birth control policy and lobbying has probably caused more unplanned pregnancies and abortions than any other policy in the modern, so that's not really a place to brag from.

Your second paragraph is too incoherent to discuss. "Death penalty" fetuses? Okay, if that's what makes your anti-choice beliefs tolerable to you. Enjoy the snow on Friday!

Anonymous wrote:The actual stance of the Catholic Church opposes the death penalty.

And, "criminal baby"...Really?!?

I have long wondered at the "pro-choice" position of better off dead, than poor or in foster care, but never before have I heard someone give the death penalty to a fetus for crimes it has yet to commit.

Exactly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.

My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.

If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?

Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.

Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.

Forcing a mob of impressionable high schoolers to tromp around in the cold is not going to accomplish anything. It's bordering on child abuse.

Does using suction and a scraper to rip a fetus limb from limb qualify as almost child abuse?

Doing that unwanted child a favor.

I'm sure you know people who had shitty childhoods but are, nonetheless, glad to be here.

?

The actual stance of the Catholic Church opposes the death penalty.

And, "criminal baby"...Really?!?

I have long wondered at the "pro-choice" position of better off dead, than poor or in foster care, but never before have I heard someone give the death penalty to a fetus for crimes it has yet to commit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:God doesn't approve of your efforts. Otherwise He wouldn't have scheduled a massive snowstorm to coincide with your demonstration.

If you now believe you're God's spokeswoman, it's past your bedtime. Sweet dreams!

I realize that it blew your mind to find out someone else knows Him better than you. But deal with it.

We have God on your side, not you. He wouldn't plan an historic snow storm if you had His support.

Haha I just came here to post this. Enjoy your 3 feet of snow, lunatics.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And yet many Catholics and Evangelicals don't bat an eye over the death penalty.

The so-called "pro life" movement only cares about the unborn. The minute that kid is born, they turn their backs. They don't care if the kid is starving, because the parent is homeless. They don't care if the kid gets accidentally shot by their little brother because they carelessly left loaded guns lying around the house. They don't care if the kid gets lead poisoning because the environment is polluted. They don't care if the kid is shipped off to be blown up in some war that we started because of a lie. They don't care if that kid dies a meth addict. They don't care if the kid dies an early death because of some serious defect or illness and the parents don't have access to adequate healthcare to manage it. The "pro life" movement is a sham. They aren't protecting lives at all.

+1000.
You forgot to mention that they oppose adoption of all those unwanted children who are languishing in the foster care system because Jesus...or something.

They aren't "pro life." I've always resented that term for the very reasons you list. They are "anti-abortion." Nothing more. And let me add, they also don't care if the child ends up mowed down in a first grade classroom by another "anti-abortionist" either. Their claims that God is on their side are hollow.

If they believe in a God who is mighty enough to create this great big world and all that is in it, they ought to believe in in a God powerful enough to immediately whisk an unborn fetus to heaven, sparing it pain and fear. They don't. They are hypocrites.

I come from a very religious background. Christians, particularly on this issue, aren't serving God. They're serving their own ego. It's blasphemous, disgusting behavior and I can guarantee you that anti-abortion christians are one of the biggest stumbling blocks to nob-believers gaining even a shred of faith that ever existed.

It's sound like maybe you were a criminal baby since you seem to think your dad thought your mom was property. You are the naive one, not me. I bet you if you were raped, you'd have an abortion. Any sane woman would. I wouldn't want a criminal baby who is going to grow up to be a loser.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A criminal baby is one conceived because of a crime -- rape.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We'll see what happens when you're raped OP. Do you really want a criminal baby?

A criminal baby? How do you define a criminal baby?

God only knows how many of your friends and neighbors are "criminal babies," especially if their mothers were considered to be property by their fathers. Your naivety is appalling. Perhaps you believe it's impossible for a man to rape his wife.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My child, who attends a Catholic school, won't be attending the March for Life. If you don't want an abortion, don't have one, period.

As a caring person, I care for others, not just myself.

Aw, me too. I care so much that I don't apply my good health insurance, stable two-income, well-educated, excellent health and great prenatal care, solid support system situation to everyone else' situation and allow them a full range of options.

You march on the Mall and try to make sure that the only available abortion is an unsafe abortion. Super caring.

I had none of what you're so proud to have, but I still allowed my child to be born ALIVE.

Good for you! Single parenthood in generational poverty with no support is a tough row to hoe, for sure, but I'm glad it works for you. I'm glad you got to make the choice that worked best for your situation. You know, since someone may have your situation or worse, and decide that that's not the kind of life they want for their child. And that's okay. That's why pro-choice people like choice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How is a painful death a healthy option for a child?

More anti-choice lies. 99% of abortions are performed before the fetus has the ability to feel pain. And it's not a child. Repeating it doesn't make it so. I could make the claim that a fetus is a tiny adult, in which case, moocher! Get a job! Get an apartment!

Some stages of human development include:

Infant
Toddler
Adolescent
And yes, fetus is a stage of development.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:God doesn't approve of your efforts. Otherwise He wouldn't have scheduled a massive snowstorm to coincide with your demonstration.

If you now believe you're God's spokeswoman, it's past your bedtime. Sweet dreams!

I realize that it blew your mind to find out someone else knows Him better than you. But deal with it.

We have God on your side, not you. He wouldn't plan an historic snow storm if you had His support.

Are you going to watch the storm being inflicted on the rest of us on your throne by his side in heaven?

^^meant to say "gay adoption."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And yet many Catholics and Evangelicals don't bat an eye over the death penalty.

The so-called "pro life" movement only cares about the unborn. The minute that kid is born, they turn their backs. They don't care if the kid is starving, because the parent is homeless. They don't care if the kid gets accidentally shot by their little brother because they carelessly left loaded guns lying around the house. They don't care if the kid gets lead poisoning because the environment is polluted. They don't care if the kid is shipped off to be blown up in some war that we started because of a lie. They don't care if that kid dies a meth addict. They don't care if the kid dies an early death because of some serious defect or illness and the parents don't have access to adequate healthcare to manage it. The "pro life" movement is a sham. They aren't protecting lives at all.

+1000.
You forgot to mention that they oppose adoption of all those unwanted children who are languishing in the foster care system because Jesus...or something.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:God doesn't approve of your efforts. Otherwise He wouldn't have scheduled a massive snowstorm to coincide with your demonstration.

If you now believe you're God's spokeswoman, it's past your bedtime. Sweet dreams!

I realize that it blew your mind to find out someone else knows Him better than you. But deal with it.

We have God on your side, not you. He wouldn't plan an historic snow storm if you had His support.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.

My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.

If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?

Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.

Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.

Forcing a mob of impressionable high schoolers to tromp around in the cold is not going to accomplish anything. It's bordering on child abuse.

Does using suction and a scraper to rip a fetus limb from limb qualify as almost child abuse?

Doing that unwanted child a favor.

I'm sure you know people who had shitty childhoods but are, nonetheless, glad to be here.

This. Very few children are "planned," but still had ok childhoods.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A Child is a Child is a Child....
no matter what stage of development.

My rights STOP where yours BEGIN....
no matter your age or stage of development.

If the father is obligated to support that child,
why shouldn't the mother at least refrain from
commiting the violent act of ending that child's life?

Whatever you want to call "it" makes no difference
to the child who IS a dependent life, as any minor child is.

Terminating the life of a child is a horror,
by knife, by needle, by gun, by suffocation.
It's the very painful termination of a life.

No, MY rights over my body supersede anything and anyone else.

Rights over one's body is not absolute. Try selling a kidney.

Go have one of your kidneys removed. Better yet try and do it yourself.