Anonymous wrote:Ladies: if you are interested in getting married, you need to be well aware of the fact that you are probably most attractive sometime in your mid- to late-twenties. This means that your mid- to late-twenties are the years in which you are most likely to attract the highest quality man you can get. And while maximizing your attractiveness is key, it all counts for nothing if you aren't single when the right guy comes along, or if you aren't putting yourself out there because you are involved with someone who is only half-committed to you. So in addition to looking your best, you need to make sure you aren't spending time in dead-end relationships.
Time and time again I see or hear about girls who allow a guy to date them for three or four years in their twenties without proposing. This blows my mind. I understand that these girls are holding out in the hope of eventually getting a proposal, but they don't give enough consideration to the possibility that they'll be strung along for another two or three years, only to have him decide that he wants someone else - or worse yet, someone younger. Combine this with a girl's reduced odds of finding someone (let alone someone better) once she begins to age and things begin to fall into perspective; it seems crazy to consider dating someone for more than a year without a very strong confidence about the direction in which the relationship is heading.
Ladies: don't give a guy your most eligible years with nothing to show for it. This is bullshit. If you ultimately want to get married and your current relationship isn't constantly growing stronger (i.e. approaching something permanent), then you need to start asking questions. And if you aren't getting satisfactory answers, it is time to look elsewhere. The clock is ticking.
Furthermore, your time is your responsibility - not his. For better or worse, men will not make commitments that aren't required of them. If he isn't taking things to the next level when you think it is appropriate, break up with him. You can do this nicely, and you should explain your reasoning clearly, but you should still break up with him. More easily said than done? Probably. But it is the best move nonetheless. If he really wants you, he will try to get you back; but if he doesn't, remember: during your most eligible years, you are better off being back on the market than tied up in a dead-end relationship.
Anonymous wrote:This lady figured out a proven method:
https://www.ted.com/talks/amy_webb_how_i_hacked_online_dating?language=en
Anonymous wrote:Agreed!
I have a 36 year old girlfriend down in the dumps because her (same aged) boyfriend "isn't sure" about marriage and children. She spent her twenties and thirties partying and now she has nothing to show for it.
I know you will probably get flamed (hard) for this, but I agree with you wholeheartedly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's an interesting scenario. I've actually been in a relationship with a woman who was 37 when I was 32. Clearly I had the time advantage on my side (no biological clock, etc.). However, at one point in the relationship she did some really unfair stuff to me (including us going sexless for 1 year). Rather than break up with her, I stuck around for 2 extra years just to make sure she lost something (time) too. Seemed fair to me. I was in no rush to move on and we got along as friends, just our sex life had gone to crap. So I basically waited her out. She realized I wouldn't propose when the sex life didn't come back. And she also realized she was about to turn 39. I feel like it was fair.
Fair? Good grief. Do you have any idea what a jackass you are?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I take issue with this post. Your 20s are for getting to know yourself, establish your career.
I think love and romance are just as important as "establishing a career." Sometimes I think the DC mindset is seriously f*cked. There's more to life than your resume!
I think you should establish yourself careerwise and financially before deciding you've found the right person to marry and procreate with. Love and romance can wait. I met my husband at 27; it's not like I put it off forever.
I didn't meet my husband until I was 38! I had a very established career and even scaled down to a lower paying job with far less travel and fewer hours. I have no regrets that I didn't get married until I was 40. In any case, you cannot plan on anything. You may find your husband at 15. You may not find him until you're 55. Just be sure it's the right guy. I totally get where the OP is coming from and actually agree with her. But I also agree with you in that establishing yourself careerwise and financially is also important when you are in your 20s. As my mother told me, "A woman should always have a way to support herself (and her children) financially, regardless of who she marries. Anything can happen -- he could leave you. He could get hit by a bus. He could become unable to work." Even though I'm a mostly SAHM now who freelances, I know that I have the skills and experience to go back to FT work when it is time to or if it becomes necessary financially while my kids are still young. In any case, you can't really plan for love and romance. But you can have control of your career and financial future.
Anonymous wrote:Here's an interesting scenario. I've actually been in a relationship with a woman who was 37 when I was 32. Clearly I had the time advantage on my side (no biological clock, etc.). However, at one point in the relationship she did some really unfair stuff to me (including us going sexless for 1 year). Rather than break up with her, I stuck around for 2 extra years just to make sure she lost something (time) too. Seemed fair to me. I was in no rush to move on and we got along as friends, just our sex life had gone to crap. So I basically waited her out. She realized I wouldn't propose when the sex life didn't come back. And she also realized she was about to turn 39. I feel like it was fair.
Anonymous wrote:You people know OP is a troll who stole this from the Rules Revisited site, don't you?
That doesn't mean the OP isn't correct, because they are; but this is just copied and pasted. OP is a troll.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also do not move in with a man hoping he will propose. All he is commuting to is a roommate who has sex with him, splits the rent and possibly cleans and cooks for him. Do NOT do it.
+1000
I made this mistake.
Anonymous wrote:Here's an interesting scenario. I've actually been in a relationship with a woman who was 37 when I was 32. Clearly I had the time advantage on my side (no biological clock, etc.). However, at one point in the relationship she did some really unfair stuff to me (including us going sexless for 1 year). Rather than break up with her, I stuck around for 2 extra years just to make sure she lost something (time) too. Seemed fair to me. I was in no rush to move on and we got along as friends, just our sex life had gone to crap. So I basically waited her out. She realized I wouldn't propose when the sex life didn't come back. And she also realized she was about to turn 39. I feel like it was fair.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the OP says it all.
Gals, if you're young.. Or not young, get the hell out early,
I've wasted 11 years. No children, no ring, and the only career that has thrived is his as I've allowed myself to be the "trailer" during a relocation.
I did it for love, but truth is, he gives a flying fuck. From the gals perspective: Don't do it. Now, extracting myself means paying the dues I've lost, without realizing all (or any) of dreams I had.
Don't be an idiot. He doesn't put a ring on it? Give yourself 2 years. Then get the fuck out. It will hurt less, and you will have less invested.
+1000