Anonymous wrote:FCPS says that the cost of reducing the elementary class size formula by just .5 student (from 26.75 to 26.25) would be $7.0 million. See page 14 of the attached.
http://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/9T8AWB70B1D4/$file/FY2016Responses%20for%20Posting1-28-15.pdf
I imagine this group is not proposing a tax increase, so the funds for this proposal will have to be cut from somewhere else in the budget. Do they actually identify where the money would come from, or is this just a political "we should get more without having to make any hard decisions" deal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Janie Strauss, the School Board member who both lives in McLean and represents the McLean schools, made an appearance at Karen Garza's "listening tour" last night and said she did NOT support the MCA resolution or taking any money away from higher-needs schools to reduce class sizes elsewhere. The MCA resolution was drafted by Louise Epstein, who also lives in McLean and narrowly lost to Strauss in the 2011 School Board election.
It seems the battle lines for the 2015 contest for the Dranesville seat are being drawn.
Louise Epstein was the first Republican I have voted for since I moved to Virginia in 1990. If the Democrats don't get their acts together, it looks like I will do so again.
My Lord, please don't encourage this blowhard to run for School Board and embarrass Dranesville again by publicly playing these kind of destructive, divisive, "me first" interest group politics. It's bad enough she has a mouthpiece through the MCA which, as another poster mentioned, is a totally unrepresentative, insignificant organization that has lost any influence it may once have had by moving well into Tea Party territory. No one listens to the MCA these days. These are simply right-wingers who are sitting in an echo chamber patting themselves on their backs for demanding that "their tax dollars" be spent on "their children." Thankfully, Dranesville was smart enough to reject Louise's pandering and smart enough to know that someone as divisive as she is in person should never wield influence anywhere outside the MCA.
Anybody who tells you, as this resolution basically does, that they can lower class sizes in McLean without spending a dime more in the Schools budget is obviously making an empty promise, and counting on you not to really think it through. Do you really think, as this resolution implies, that kids in small classes who have special needs, speak ESOL, or live below the poverty line are "making out like bandits?" Yeah, I'm quoting Catherine Lorenze, who was Louise Epstein's campaign manager last time around. Shame on you for voting for her in the first place. People with these kinds of beliefs have no place in truly public education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just don't understand why its controversial to increase the title 1 class sizes. If there is a cap (21?) why not staff up to the cap? A class size of 10 at one school when other schools have 30+ per class is bizarre.
I'm not sure where your confusion is. Hypothetically, if there are 46 kids in 2nd grade, at a non-Title 1 school, they would be divided into 2 classes, each with 23 kids. But in a Title 1 school, where there are apparently caps for grades K-3 of 22 kids per class, there are two possibilities: 2 classes with 22 kids each and 1 class with only 2 kids OR 3 classes with 15-16 kids each. Either way, there will be 3 classes at the Title 1 school, needing 3 teachers. The optics may look bad when you say, hey how come they have only 15 kids in a class, but, really, when you say "staff up to the cap" are you really advocating they do classes of 22, 22 and 2, just so they can say, hey only one of the classes is below the cap? That's goofy.
What they could do though is use title 1 money for that extra teacher they need instead of getting three teachers through the FCPS formula and then spending all their title 1 money on an instructional coach.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Janie Strauss, the School Board member who both lives in McLean and represents the McLean schools, made an appearance at Karen Garza's "listening tour" last night and said she did NOT support the MCA resolution or taking any money away from higher-needs schools to reduce class sizes elsewhere. The MCA resolution was drafted by Louise Epstein, who also lives in McLean and narrowly lost to Strauss in the 2011 School Board election.
It seems the battle lines for the 2015 contest for the Dranesville seat are being drawn.
Louise Epstein was the first Republican I have voted for since I moved to Virginia in 1990. If the Democrats don't get their acts together, it looks like I will do so again.
My Lord, please don't encourage this blowhard to run for School Board and embarrass Dranesville again by publicly playing these kind of destructive, divisive, "me first" interest group politics. It's bad enough she has a mouthpiece through the MCA which, as another poster mentioned, is a totally unrepresentative, insignificant organization that has lost any influence it may once have had by moving well into Tea Party territory. No one listens to the MCA these days. These are simply right-wingers who are sitting in an echo chamber patting themselves on their backs for demanding that "their tax dollars" be spent on "their children." Thankfully, Dranesville was smart enough to reject Louise's pandering and smart enough to know that someone as divisive as she is in person should never wield influence anywhere outside the MCA.
Anybody who tells you, as this resolution basically does, that they can lower class sizes in McLean without spending a dime more in the Schools budget is obviously making an empty promise, and counting on you not to really think it through. Do you really think, as this resolution implies, that kids in small classes who have special needs, speak ESOL, or live below the poverty line are "making out like bandits?" Yeah, I'm quoting Catherine Lorenze, who was Louise Epstein's campaign manager last time around. Shame on you for voting for her in the first place. People with these kinds of beliefs have no place in truly public education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Janie Strauss, the School Board member who both lives in McLean and represents the McLean schools, made an appearance at Karen Garza's "listening tour" last night and said she did NOT support the MCA resolution or taking any money away from higher-needs schools to reduce class sizes elsewhere. The MCA resolution was drafted by Louise Epstein, who also lives in McLean and narrowly lost to Strauss in the 2011 School Board election.
It seems the battle lines for the 2015 contest for the Dranesville seat are being drawn.
Louise Epstein was the first Republican I have voted for since I moved to Virginia in 1990. If the Democrats don't get their acts together, it looks like I will do so again.
My Lord, please don't encourage this blowhard to run for School Board and embarrass Dranesville again by publicly playing these kind of destructive, divisive, "me first" interest group politics. It's bad enough she has a mouthpiece through the MCA which, as another poster mentioned, is a totally unrepresentative, insignificant organization that has lost any influence it may once have had by moving well into Tea Party territory. No one listens to the MCA these days. These are simply right-wingers who are sitting in an echo chamber patting themselves on their backs for demanding that "their tax dollars" be spent on "their children." Thankfully, Dranesville was smart enough to reject Louise's pandering and smart enough to know that someone as divisive as she is in person should never wield influence anywhere outside the MCA.
Anybody who tells you, as this resolution basically does, that they can lower class sizes in McLean without spending a dime more in the Schools budget is obviously making an empty promise, and counting on you not to really think it through. Do you really think, as this resolution implies, that kids in small classes who have special needs, speak ESOL, or live below the poverty line are "making out like bandits?" Yeah, I'm quoting Catherine Lorenze, who was Louise Epstein's campaign manager last time around. Shame on you for voting for her in the first place. People with these kinds of beliefs have no place in truly public education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are 1st-3rd grade classes with 10 students in them and others with over 30. It's gotten completely out of whack and I don't blame parents for being upset. There should not be that much discrepancy. I haven't read the demand, but most parents just think things need to be shifted a bit so that all class sizes are a bit more manageable and the difference between the largest and smallest class size in FCPS for the same grade is a little smaller than 20 plus students.
Maybe those overly burdened Mc lean kids should be bused to the Title 1 schools with 10 kids per class.
But most of those kids are brown!
So you're actually OK with increasing the class sizes in Title I schools, but only if we inconvenience other students and spend more on transportation in the process?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Janie Strauss, the School Board member who both lives in McLean and represents the McLean schools, made an appearance at Karen Garza's "listening tour" last night and said she did NOT support the MCA resolution or taking any money away from higher-needs schools to reduce class sizes elsewhere. The MCA resolution was drafted by Louise Epstein, who also lives in McLean and narrowly lost to Strauss in the 2011 School Board election.
It seems the battle lines for the 2015 contest for the Dranesville seat are being drawn.
Louise Epstein was the first Republican I have voted for since I moved to Virginia in 1990. If the Democrats don't get their acts together, it looks like I will do so again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are 1st-3rd grade classes with 10 students in them and others with over 30. It's gotten completely out of whack and I don't blame parents for being upset. There should not be that much discrepancy. I haven't read the demand, but most parents just think things need to be shifted a bit so that all class sizes are a bit more manageable and the difference between the largest and smallest class size in FCPS for the same grade is a little smaller than 20 plus students.
Maybe those overly burdened Mc lean kids should be bused to the Title 1 schools with 10 kids per class.
But most of those kids are brown!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just don't understand why its controversial to increase the title 1 class sizes. If there is a cap (21?) why not staff up to the cap? A class size of 10 at one school when other schools have 30+ per class is bizarre.
I'm not sure where your confusion is. Hypothetically, if there are 46 kids in 2nd grade, at a non-Title 1 school, they would be divided into 2 classes, each with 23 kids. But in a Title 1 school, where there are apparently caps for grades K-3 of 22 kids per class, there are two possibilities: 2 classes with 22 kids each and 1 class with only 2 kids OR 3 classes with 15-16 kids each. Either way, there will be 3 classes at the Title 1 school, needing 3 teachers. The optics may look bad when you say, hey how come they have only 15 kids in a class, but, really, when you say "staff up to the cap" are you really advocating they do classes of 22, 22 and 2, just so they can say, hey only one of the classes is below the cap? That's goofy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are 1st-3rd grade classes with 10 students in them and others with over 30. It's gotten completely out of whack and I don't blame parents for being upset. There should not be that much discrepancy. I haven't read the demand, but most parents just think things need to be shifted a bit so that all class sizes are a bit more manageable and the difference between the largest and smallest class size in FCPS for the same grade is a little smaller than 20 plus students.
Maybe those overly burdened Mc lean kids should be bused to the Title 1 schools with 10 kids per class.
Anonymous wrote:I just don't understand why its controversial to increase the title 1 class sizes. If there is a cap (21?) why not staff up to the cap? A class size of 10 at one school when other schools have 30+ per class is bizarre.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Janie Strauss, the School Board member who both lives in McLean and represents the McLean schools, made an appearance at Karen Garza's "listening tour" last night and said she did NOT support the MCA resolution or taking any money away from higher-needs schools to reduce class sizes elsewhere. The MCA resolution was drafted by Louise Epstein, who also lives in McLean and narrowly lost to Strauss in the 2011 School Board election.
It seems the battle lines for the 2015 contest for the Dranesville seat are being drawn.
Louise Epstein was the first Republican I have voted for since I moved to Virginia in 1990. If the Democrats don't get their acts together, it looks like I will do so again.
Anonymous wrote:51% of the classes with more than 30 kids in them are AAP.
______________
Is this true? There's an extremely simple solution for that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:51% of the classes with more than 30 kids in them are AAP.
______________
Is this true? There's an extremely simple solution for that.
Add an additional teacher per grade per center school? Simple.