Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't remember the last time I was in my backyard. If there was something back there, it's been there since I don't know when. We really only use it in the summer when life slows down.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.
If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.
So we wouldn't be decent human beings I guess.
Was there a murder nearby, and did authorities make several public pleas for you to check for evidence so obviously needed? That woman is nothing but a lazy yahoo.
There are 3 other neighbors that back up to this creek. Not just the one lady but 3 other families could not be bothered to look on the surrounding property. a couple of acres, not mountains, in late summer/fall weather. You know that if someone outside that region ventured on to that land for a night or 2, the local cops would have been called.
Morgan Harrington's mother, Gil, has never met Blaine Eichner. In fact, she never knew the name of the man who found her daughter's T-shirt. "It was pivotal," Harrington tells WTOP. "It was also concerning." The out-in-the-open discovery of her daughter's Pantera shirt is telling, in Harrington's mind. "To have blatantly taken the most obvious, identifiable item that law enforcement was asking for, and kind of draping it like a trophy displayed a certain type of bravado that was chilling to me," says Harrington. "It really seemed like a trophy presentation of a pretty serious predator," says Harrington.
Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3727505/Man-describes-finding-key-piece-of-evidence-linking-Harrington-murder-Fairfax-rape-case#ixzz3GvV3v3VN
I think it is terrible that the property owners couldn't be bothered. I own an empty wooded lot in another state and if something similar happened, at the very least I would call the homeowner's association and the police and ask if someone could walk the property. Many people never want to get involved or bother to take the extra time to report something or someone suspicious.
The homeowner's association? My god, the privilege on DCUM never stops. Do you have any idea of what a true rural location is like? There is no homeowner's association. You all really have no clue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't remember the last time I was in my backyard. If there was something back there, it's been there since I don't know when. We really only use it in the summer when life slows down.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.
If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.
So we wouldn't be decent human beings I guess.
Was there a murder nearby, and did authorities make several public pleas for you to check for evidence so obviously needed? That woman is nothing but a lazy yahoo.
There are 3 other neighbors that back up to this creek. Not just the one lady but 3 other families could not be bothered to look on the surrounding property. a couple of acres, not mountains, in late summer/fall weather. You know that if someone outside that region ventured on to that land for a night or 2, the local cops would have been called.
Morgan Harrington's mother, Gil, has never met Blaine Eichner. In fact, she never knew the name of the man who found her daughter's T-shirt. "It was pivotal," Harrington tells WTOP. "It was also concerning." The out-in-the-open discovery of her daughter's Pantera shirt is telling, in Harrington's mind. "To have blatantly taken the most obvious, identifiable item that law enforcement was asking for, and kind of draping it like a trophy displayed a certain type of bravado that was chilling to me," says Harrington. "It really seemed like a trophy presentation of a pretty serious predator," says Harrington.
Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3727505/Man-describes-finding-key-piece-of-evidence-linking-Harrington-murder-Fairfax-rape-case#ixzz3GvV3v3VN
I think it is terrible that the property owners couldn't be bothered. I own an empty wooded lot in another state and if something similar happened, at the very least I would call the homeowner's association and the police and ask if someone could walk the property. Many people never want to get involved or bother to take the extra time to report something or someone suspicious.
The homeowner's association? My god, the privilege on DCUM never stops. Do you have any idea of what a true rural location is like? There is no homeowner's association. You all really have no clue.
Have you taken a look at the pricing on some of the nearby homes? There may not be an HOA in that area, it may be secluded/rural but there are big homes worth millions nearby, too. That doesn't mean that the owners of this particular property where the remains were found are wealthy/privileged by any stretch. But I would imagine that there must be someone in the area that can be called on to keep an eye out on some of those $$$$ properties while the owners are away on vacation, etc. This is not to say that the owners of the property in question could have afforded to pay someone to walk the property or knew anyone that would be willing to do it, of course.
Just stop. You sound more ridiculous with every post.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't remember the last time I was in my backyard. If there was something back there, it's been there since I don't know when. We really only use it in the summer when life slows down.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.
If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.
So we wouldn't be decent human beings I guess.
Was there a murder nearby, and did authorities make several public pleas for you to check for evidence so obviously needed? That woman is nothing but a lazy yahoo.
There are 3 other neighbors that back up to this creek. Not just the one lady but 3 other families could not be bothered to look on the surrounding property. a couple of acres, not mountains, in late summer/fall weather. You know that if someone outside that region ventured on to that land for a night or 2, the local cops would have been called.
Morgan Harrington's mother, Gil, has never met Blaine Eichner. In fact, she never knew the name of the man who found her daughter's T-shirt. "It was pivotal," Harrington tells WTOP. "It was also concerning." The out-in-the-open discovery of her daughter's Pantera shirt is telling, in Harrington's mind. "To have blatantly taken the most obvious, identifiable item that law enforcement was asking for, and kind of draping it like a trophy displayed a certain type of bravado that was chilling to me," says Harrington. "It really seemed like a trophy presentation of a pretty serious predator," says Harrington.
Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3727505/Man-describes-finding-key-piece-of-evidence-linking-Harrington-murder-Fairfax-rape-case#ixzz3GvV3v3VN
I think it is terrible that the property owners couldn't be bothered. I own an empty wooded lot in another state and if something similar happened, at the very least I would call the homeowner's association and the police and ask if someone could walk the property. Many people never want to get involved or bother to take the extra time to report something or someone suspicious.
The homeowner's association? My god, the privilege on DCUM never stops. Do you have any idea of what a true rural location is like? There is no homeowner's association. You all really have no clue.
Have you taken a look at the pricing on some of the nearby homes? There may not be an HOA in that area, it may be secluded/rural but there are big homes worth millions nearby, too. That doesn't mean that the owners of this particular property where the remains were found are wealthy/privileged by any stretch. But I would imagine that there must be someone in the area that can be called on to keep an eye out on some of those $$$$ properties while the owners are away on vacation, etc. This is not to say that the owners of the property in question could have afforded to pay someone to walk the property or knew anyone that would be willing to do it, of course.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't remember the last time I was in my backyard. If there was something back there, it's been there since I don't know when. We really only use it in the summer when life slows down.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.
If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.
So we wouldn't be decent human beings I guess.
Was there a murder nearby, and did authorities make several public pleas for you to check for evidence so obviously needed? That woman is nothing but a lazy yahoo.
There are 3 other neighbors that back up to this creek. Not just the one lady but 3 other families could not be bothered to look on the surrounding property. a couple of acres, not mountains, in late summer/fall weather. You know that if someone outside that region ventured on to that land for a night or 2, the local cops would have been called.
Morgan Harrington's mother, Gil, has never met Blaine Eichner. In fact, she never knew the name of the man who found her daughter's T-shirt. "It was pivotal," Harrington tells WTOP. "It was also concerning." The out-in-the-open discovery of her daughter's Pantera shirt is telling, in Harrington's mind. "To have blatantly taken the most obvious, identifiable item that law enforcement was asking for, and kind of draping it like a trophy displayed a certain type of bravado that was chilling to me," says Harrington. "It really seemed like a trophy presentation of a pretty serious predator," says Harrington.
Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3727505/Man-describes-finding-key-piece-of-evidence-linking-Harrington-murder-Fairfax-rape-case#ixzz3GvV3v3VN
I think it is terrible that the property owners couldn't be bothered. I own an empty wooded lot in another state and if something similar happened, at the very least I would call the homeowner's association and the police and ask if someone could walk the property. Many people never want to get involved or bother to take the extra time to report something or someone suspicious.
The homeowner's association? My god, the privilege on DCUM never stops. Do you have any idea of what a true rural location is like? There is no homeowner's association. You all really have no clue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a question - if the DNA from the Fairfax rape and the Harrington murder are a match, why hasn't Matthew been officially charged with the Harrington murder as well? I don't know what DNA evidence they found in the Harrington murder but if it wasn't semen could the defense be that she was just a passenger in his cab? Just wondering.
I was wondering the same thing, but the WTOP link that PP posted implies that the DNA that matched the Fairfax case was found on the Pantera shirt. Previously I assumed that the link to the Fairfax case was made from DNA found on Morgan's body or at the scene where her body was recovered. If the DNA came from the shirt, depending on what type of DNA it is, maybe not enough of a link for a charge?
Yeah if the DNA is from the shirt, the defense could claim a passenger left it in his cab and another passenger picked it up.
I think they have a witness who saw her getting into a cab, and they know that he was on duty that night.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't remember the last time I was in my backyard. If there was something back there, it's been there since I don't know when. We really only use it in the summer when life slows down.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.
If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.
So we wouldn't be decent human beings I guess.
Was there a murder nearby, and did authorities make several public pleas for you to check for evidence so obviously needed? That woman is nothing but a lazy yahoo.
There are 3 other neighbors that back up to this creek. Not just the one lady but 3 other families could not be bothered to look on the surrounding property. a couple of acres, not mountains, in late summer/fall weather. You know that if someone outside that region ventured on to that land for a night or 2, the local cops would have been called.
Morgan Harrington's mother, Gil, has never met Blaine Eichner. In fact, she never knew the name of the man who found her daughter's T-shirt. "It was pivotal," Harrington tells WTOP. "It was also concerning." The out-in-the-open discovery of her daughter's Pantera shirt is telling, in Harrington's mind. "To have blatantly taken the most obvious, identifiable item that law enforcement was asking for, and kind of draping it like a trophy displayed a certain type of bravado that was chilling to me," says Harrington. "It really seemed like a trophy presentation of a pretty serious predator," says Harrington.
Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3727505/Man-describes-finding-key-piece-of-evidence-linking-Harrington-murder-Fairfax-rape-case#ixzz3GvV3v3VN
I think it is terrible that the property owners couldn't be bothered. I own an empty wooded lot in another state and if something similar happened, at the very least I would call the homeowner's association and the police and ask if someone could walk the property. Many people never want to get involved or bother to take the extra time to report something or someone suspicious.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a question - if the DNA from the Fairfax rape and the Harrington murder are a match, why hasn't Matthew been officially charged with the Harrington murder as well? I don't know what DNA evidence they found in the Harrington murder but if it wasn't semen could the defense be that she was just a passenger in his cab? Just wondering.
I was wondering the same thing, but the WTOP link that PP posted implies that the DNA that matched the Fairfax case was found on the Pantera shirt. Previously I assumed that the link to the Fairfax case was made from DNA found on Morgan's body or at the scene where her body was recovered. If the DNA came from the shirt, depending on what type of DNA it is, maybe not enough of a link for a charge?
I think they have a shot at lining up an airtight case against this guy for multiple assaults/murders and they're taking the time to make sure everything is in perfect order.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a question - if the DNA from the Fairfax rape and the Harrington murder are a match, why hasn't Matthew been officially charged with the Harrington murder as well? I don't know what DNA evidence they found in the Harrington murder but if it wasn't semen could the defense be that she was just a passenger in his cab? Just wondering.
I was wondering the same thing, but the WTOP link that PP posted implies that the DNA that matched the Fairfax case was found on the Pantera shirt. Previously I assumed that the link to the Fairfax case was made from DNA found on Morgan's body or at the scene where her body was recovered. If the DNA came from the shirt, depending on what type of DNA it is, maybe not enough of a link for a charge?
Yeah if the DNA is from the shirt, the defense could claim a passenger left it in his cab and another passenger picked it up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a question - if the DNA from the Fairfax rape and the Harrington murder are a match, why hasn't Matthew been officially charged with the Harrington murder as well? I don't know what DNA evidence they found in the Harrington murder but if it wasn't semen could the defense be that she was just a passenger in his cab? Just wondering.
I was wondering the same thing, but the WTOP link that PP posted implies that the DNA that matched the Fairfax case was found on the Pantera shirt. Previously I assumed that the link to the Fairfax case was made from DNA found on Morgan's body or at the scene where her body was recovered. If the DNA came from the shirt, depending on what type of DNA it is, maybe not enough of a link for a charge?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a question - if the DNA from the Fairfax rape and the Harrington murder are a match, why hasn't Matthew been officially charged with the Harrington murder as well? I don't know what DNA evidence they found in the Harrington murder but if it wasn't semen could the defense be that she was just a passenger in his cab? Just wondering.
I was wondering the same thing, but the WTOP link that PP posted implies that the DNA that matched the Fairfax case was found on the Pantera shirt. Previously I assumed that the link to the Fairfax case was made from DNA found on Morgan's body or at the scene where her body was recovered. If the DNA came from the shirt, depending on what type of DNA it is, maybe not enough of a link for a charge?
Anonymous wrote:I have a question - if the DNA from the Fairfax rape and the Harrington murder are a match, why hasn't Matthew been officially charged with the Harrington murder as well? I don't know what DNA evidence they found in the Harrington murder but if it wasn't semen could the defense be that she was just a passenger in his cab? Just wondering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't remember the last time I was in my backyard. If there was something back there, it's been there since I don't know when. We really only use it in the summer when life slows down.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.
If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.
So we wouldn't be decent human beings I guess.
Was there a murder nearby, and did authorities make several public pleas for you to check for evidence so obviously needed? That woman is nothing but a lazy yahoo.
There are 3 other neighbors that back up to this creek. Not just the one lady but 3 other families could not be bothered to look on the surrounding property. a couple of acres, not mountains, in late summer/fall weather. You know that if someone outside that region ventured on to that land for a night or 2, the local cops would have been called.
Morgan Harrington's mother, Gil, has never met Blaine Eichner. In fact, she never knew the name of the man who found her daughter's T-shirt. "It was pivotal," Harrington tells WTOP. "It was also concerning." The out-in-the-open discovery of her daughter's Pantera shirt is telling, in Harrington's mind. "To have blatantly taken the most obvious, identifiable item that law enforcement was asking for, and kind of draping it like a trophy displayed a certain type of bravado that was chilling to me," says Harrington. "It really seemed like a trophy presentation of a pretty serious predator," says Harrington.
Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3727505/Man-describes-finding-key-piece-of-evidence-linking-Harrington-murder-Fairfax-rape-case#ixzz3GvV3v3VN
I think it is terrible that the property owners couldn't be bothered. I own an empty wooded lot in another state and if something similar happened, at the very least I would call the homeowner's association and the police and ask if someone could walk the property. Many people never want to get involved or bother to take the extra time to report something or someone suspicious.
Just how do you know that the property owner didn’t have the property searched or have someone else walk the property? YOU DON’T! Perhaps they did and found nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't remember the last time I was in my backyard. If there was something back there, it's been there since I don't know when. We really only use it in the summer when life slows down.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.
If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.
So we wouldn't be decent human beings I guess.
Was there a murder nearby, and did authorities make several public pleas for you to check for evidence so obviously needed? That woman is nothing but a lazy yahoo.
There are 3 other neighbors that back up to this creek. Not just the one lady but 3 other families could not be bothered to look on the surrounding property. a couple of acres, not mountains, in late summer/fall weather. You know that if someone outside that region ventured on to that land for a night or 2, the local cops would have been called.
Morgan Harrington's mother, Gil, has never met Blaine Eichner. In fact, she never knew the name of the man who found her daughter's T-shirt. "It was pivotal," Harrington tells WTOP. "It was also concerning." The out-in-the-open discovery of her daughter's Pantera shirt is telling, in Harrington's mind. "To have blatantly taken the most obvious, identifiable item that law enforcement was asking for, and kind of draping it like a trophy displayed a certain type of bravado that was chilling to me," says Harrington. "It really seemed like a trophy presentation of a pretty serious predator," says Harrington.
Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3727505/Man-describes-finding-key-piece-of-evidence-linking-Harrington-murder-Fairfax-rape-case#ixzz3GvV3v3VN
I think it is terrible that the property owners couldn't be bothered. I own an empty wooded lot in another state and if something similar happened, at the very least I would call the homeowner's association and the police and ask if someone could walk the property. Many people never want to get involved or bother to take the extra time to report something or someone suspicious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't remember the last time I was in my backyard. If there was something back there, it's been there since I don't know when. We really only use it in the summer when life slows down.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were hoping to find DNA on the pants found nearby the skeleton.
If the woman had checked her property, like a decent human being, this would be resolved by now.
So we wouldn't be decent human beings I guess.
Was there a murder nearby, and did authorities make several public pleas for you to check for evidence so obviously needed? That woman is nothing but a lazy yahoo.
There are 3 other neighbors that back up to this creek. Not just the one lady but 3 other families could not be bothered to look on the surrounding property. a couple of acres, not mountains, in late summer/fall weather. You know that if someone outside that region ventured on to that land for a night or 2, the local cops would have been called.
Morgan Harrington's mother, Gil, has never met Blaine Eichner. In fact, she never knew the name of the man who found her daughter's T-shirt. "It was pivotal," Harrington tells WTOP. "It was also concerning." The out-in-the-open discovery of her daughter's Pantera shirt is telling, in Harrington's mind. "To have blatantly taken the most obvious, identifiable item that law enforcement was asking for, and kind of draping it like a trophy displayed a certain type of bravado that was chilling to me," says Harrington. "It really seemed like a trophy presentation of a pretty serious predator," says Harrington.
Read more: http://www.wtop.com/41/3727505/Man-describes-finding-key-piece-of-evidence-linking-Harrington-murder-Fairfax-rape-case#ixzz3GvV3v3VN