Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm done with the effort to be respectful. Let's rephrase, shall we? ISLAM PERMITS MUSLIM SOLDIERS TO RAPE NON-MUSLIM WOMEN CAPTIVES.
I haven't even begun to address this new accusation now about captives. Lets see..we went from Muhammad being a pedophile to Islam being unjust in divorce, testimony, inheritance, then the very noteworthy info that many converts are, gasp, African American, and poor too.. and not one of Muslima's or my explanations did you accept but now we're onto the topic of captives, are we?
And all of that was you being respectful?
I never addressed the point about Mary that you or others brought up because I thought it moot. Isn't Mary equally revered in the Christian faith? Do Christians not pray to Mary also? Are there not statues of Mary around or in Christian places of worship? If Muhammad was a pedophile in (brace yourself, its coming again) 600 AD, then why do you say "Hail Mary" prayers and have statues of her in your churches given the disgrace of becoming pregnant, particularly in that time, with no husband?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have heard of Christian missionary groups but I have never heard of Muslim missionary groups, have you? I worked with refugee Muslim families and they told me about Christian missionary groups on the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. They are impoverished Muslim families and the familes tell me that Christian missionary groups sweep in, providing baskets of food and water but also quite a few brochures on "Jesus, our Savior." lol Honestly, Muslims NEVER want people to convert under compulsion or coercion. It has to be through revelation and divine guidance. Muslima was speaking in "flowery" terms not because she was proselytizing, but simply because she clearly is devoted and loves her faith. Nothing wrong with that! It just irritated the hell out of you that she spoke so positively about her faith, thats all.
I think Muslima and I have been informative and answered questions to the best of our ability. I think we've done a fine job. I'm glad that now this thread will permanently remain with links included for people to learn more about true Islam. My intention was never to convert anyone, but simply to remove some of the hatred and vile accusations against a religion that is dear to billions of people.
Please, just stop. Islam is ALL about conversion. You deny the "compulsion" part, and that lack of compulsion is probably true in many areas. But compulsion MOST DEFINITELY EXISTS in Muslim-run areas where non-Muslim dhimmis face economic sanctions for not converting, and where polytheists are subject to slavery for not converting (I'm thinking of Mauritania, for example).
You simply can't, and shouldn't feign, ignorance about Muslim efforts to convert people. For example, a mosque in Virginia leaves flyers on doorsteps (my non-Muslim coworker finds them on her doorstep) about Islam. Some flyers talk about the "truths of Islam" and one flyer even argued that Islam isn't really anti-dog (yes, I understand the various positions about cats vs. dogs, but I think we can all agree we don't want to get into that one.)
The fact that you and Muslima are deliberately painting a distorted picture of Islam is proof enough that you're trying to convert people. (Sorry, but a distorted picture is not "fine job" at all, and clarifying the distortions isn't "vile" unless you think the truth about your religion is "vile.") That, plus the fact that you're practically salivating over the prospect (completely fantastical and unsupported by any stats) of a Muslim on every block, speak more truly to your desire to convert.
(Also: "that's all" not "thats" all.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I will look for the evidence you seek regarding the numbers.
I will look forward either to your numbers or to your admission that these numbers do not exist, and the comment about Islam growing by conversion more than immigration in the U.S. is your theory unsupported by evidence.
Meanwhile, why devote so much to explaining that some percentage of Islam includes ghetto or African Americans? WTH? Why is the color of their skin or economic status noteworthy in discussing population numbers? Regardless of color of skin and economic status, they COUNT. Moreover, Islam does not care about the color of anyone's skin or economic status.
Because when a new concept or product makes inroads in the market, the sponsors of this concept of products usually pay attention to the demographics of their customers. Let's flip this around. If the majority of the Muslim converts in the U.S. were Harvard graduates, I would bet my firstborn that this fact will be present in every single piece of dawa literature CAIR hands out. So it seems equally legitimate to present the analysis of the real population of American Muslims and to note where most of them come from. These are the forgotten Muslims whose voice has never been included in the political Muslim discourse - simply because this population doesn't have the wherewithal to become political. But they are Muslims nevertheless, and they have specific needs and challenges. It isn't becoming of you to insist that they a)don't exist, or b) are Muslims like any other. The challenges faced by this population are very different from those faced by immigrant Muslims. Yet Muslim discourse in America is shaped by wealthy immigrant Muslims.
Islam may not care about anyone's skin color or economic status. But Muslims do.
People from France to African Americans are converting and in God's eyes their devotion is equal. Perhaps this is why so many African Americans do convert to Islam- they feel welcomed in Islam.
African-Americans convert to Islam for many reasons. If you want to talk about that population intelligently, do a bit of reading and progress to beyond "perhaps." They aren't like you. Their problems are not like your problems.
However, what I described to you in previous pages was the face of the new Muslim. The new Muslim will be a blend of mixed races. And every successive generation will be more wealthy. Iranian Muslims, Arab Muslims, and Pakistan Muslims that are first generation are fairly wealthy and well educated. This pattern will continue. You would never recognize my kids as " Muslim" if you saw them. This is the new face of Islam. But the new generation is not losing their faith in the process of assimilation.
In the U.S., they are, because the U.S. enforces education and income barriers to entry. In Europe, not so. These Muslims aren't wealthy or educated.
I should also mention, for reality's sake, that Iranian Muslims are a separate population with whom mainstream Sunni Islam seeks no particular affiliation. You can spin your tales of Muslim unity when you succeed in eradicating the term "rafidah" from the Sunni discourse.
Soon there will be a Muslim on every block if not in every house. Everyone will know at least one Muslim. I am not trying to frighten you with this prediction; its simply the direction we are headed in. So its not wise to alienate such a large population by insults about our religion or references to people in our faith who live in ghetto's..
Oh dear. There are three Muslims in my house already. There is a certainly-Muslim child growing in my womb. You don't frighten me with Muslim anything. I lived among them all my life. I know Muslim reality, both here and elsewhere. The Muslim reality in the U.S. is this:
- the prediction of Muslims in every block, if not in every house, is not supported by demographic evidence, unless your definition of "soon" differs from most people mean. If you brought numbers to show the forecast of Muslim population in the U.S, that'd be different. But all you brought is your own passion. Very nice, eh, but unconvincing.
Realistic criticism of your religion is not an insult, unless you a sort of Muslim to whom everyone who doesn't like Islam is an offender.
It's not an insult to say many Muslim-Americans hail from the ghetto. They do. That's their economic and demographic reality. If you don't like the word ghetto, how about this: many Muslim-Americans are black, poor, have below-high school education and often a prison record. They are also ignored by wealthy immigrant Muslims who think their voices are enough to shape Muslim discourse in America.
Polite enough for you?
Aaaahhh, so you pointed out that many Muslims are African American and from ghettos to provide valuable demographic and marketing information in case DCUMers wish to market products to them? People are chuckling right now, particularly the African Americans and those from ghettos. I never mentioned the race or economic status of converts because it's irrelevant. No matter how dark their complexion or fat their wallets, they still count as converts. In fact, I actually can not confirm or deny your assertion that most converts are African American or from ghettos as it was never importnat enough a factor for me, as a Muslim, to research or learn about.
Realistic criticism is welcome. Calling our beloved prophet a pedophile is not a realistic criticism. It's an insult. And the accusation that our prophet was a pedophile was flung early on in this thread by some. Not a good way to begin a sober discourse if people's intent is simply to understand Islamic principles, is it?
Was it you that also said Islam commands death for apostasy? If so, once again, you are wrong because you resort heavily on your cliff notes version of the Sharia and insist on doing so, despite my telling you that Sharia is man made law, not God's law. Only the Quran is God's law. Thus, rely on the Quran only and rely on reputable scholarly work to interpret it if you are confused about anything. Living with three Muslims has obviously not been enough to help clarify your misunderstanding about Islam. Why did you not contact a reutable scholar or Imam to better understand Islam then? Why get on DCUM and repeat the false and vile accusations about Islam?
Since it appears you may not have sought authoritative sources to clarify your misunderstanding about Islam, I will provide it. Hamza Yusuf is a very reputable Islamic scholar in the US. He's an American convert. Btw, he's caucasian and from a well established, wealthy Californian family…just providing this information for the DCUM marketers out there. lol lol
Hamza Yusuf may be accessible via a phone call. If you are truly interested in clarifying your misunderstanding you would call him. Here is his bio:
"He is one of the leading proponents of classical learning in Islam. He has promoted Islamic sciences and classical teaching methodologies throughout the world. He has also been a strong advocate for social justice, peace, and conviviality among peoples and places. For several years, he has argued that the "them versus us" problem is fundamentally flawed, as he considers himself one of "them" as well as one of "us."Hamza Yusuf is a cofounder of Zaytuna College, located in Berkeley, California. He is an advisor to Stanford University's Program in Islamic Studies and the Center for Islamic Studies at Berkeley's Graduate Theological Union. He also serves as a member of the board of advisors of George Russell's One Nation, a national philanthropic initiative that promotes pluralism and inclusion in America. In addition, he serves as vice-president for the Global Center for Guidance and Renewal, which was founded and is currently presided over by Shaykh Abdallah bin Bayyah, one of the top jurists and masters of Islamic sciences in the world. Recently, Hamza Yusuf was ranked as "the Western world's most influential Islamic scholar" by The 500 Most Influential Muslims, edited by John Esposito and Ibrahim Kalin, (2009).
Hamza Yusuf is one of the leading proponents of classical learning in Islam. He has promoted Islamic sciences and classical teaching methodologies throughout the world. He has also been a strong advocate for social justice, peace, and conviviality among peoples and places. For several years, he has argued that the "them versus us" problem is fundamentally flawed, as he considers himself one of "them" as well as one of "us"."
Here is a link to Humza Yusuf explaining how true Islam handles apostasy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naEj915VU20
Let me know if anyone has problems with this link.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Soon there will be a Muslim on every block if not in every house. Everyone will know at least one Muslim. I am not trying to frighten you with this prediction; its simply the direction we are headed in. So its not wise to alienate such a large population by insults about our religion or references to people in our faith who live in ghetto's...
Proof? Source? Link? ANYTHING to show this isn't just the product of your feverish imagination?
Remember that Muslims are not trying to conquer the world, it just represents the growth rate of Muslims across the world:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2011/feb/11/islam-population
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Soon there will be a Muslim on every block if not in every house. Everyone will know at least one Muslim. I am not trying to frighten you with this prediction; its simply the direction we are headed in. So its not wise to alienate such a large population by insults about our religion or references to people in our faith who live in ghetto's...
Proof? Source? Link? ANYTHING to show this isn't just the product of your feverish imagination?
Remember that Muslims are not trying to conquer the world, it just represents the growth rate of Muslims across the world:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2011/feb/11/islam-population
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Soon there will be a Muslim on every block if not in every house. Everyone will know at least one Muslim. I am not trying to frighten you with this prediction; its simply the direction we are headed in. So its not wise to alienate such a large population by insults about our religion or references to people in our faith who live in ghetto's...
Proof? Source? Link? ANYTHING to show this isn't just the product of your feverish imagination?
Anonymous wrote:And now, fellow Islam-haters, I take a break from "proselytizing" to get back to life. Who knew prosleytizing could be such hard work.
I will provide more accurate numbers on conversion at some point in the future.
Fellow DCUMers, I hope that if you ever wish to truly understand Islam, that you will never begin a discourse with an accusation that Muhammad was a pedophile.
Remember also that the Sharia is sadly very flawed and has oppressed women and infringed upon their rights. It is man made law. Only the Quran is God's law. Thus, when you see terrible stories of women being oppressed and justified by the Sharia, know this - that it is not true Islam. So much of the Sharia in other countries is polluted with old and oppressive cultural traditions of patriarchy and this has NOTHING to do with true Islam. If you are in any doubt, call a scholar. They are accessible! The best American Islamic scholar is Hamza Yusuf in California. He's an American convert. Google him and read the books he has written. Take the initiative to call him also. This is the only way to learn about true Islam.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like your fantasy more than any possible reality.
Also, why did you assume PP's reference to African American converts was somehow pejorative? I didn't read it that way. This seems to be your problem, not hers.
Also, ghettos not ghetto's.
So why mention it? And why mention ghettos? Just lunchtime table convo?
If you are allowed to say many first gen Muslims are wealthy, then it is perfectly fine for me to say many native Muslims in America are not.
Anonymous wrote:
I will look for the evidence you seek regarding the numbers.
I will look forward either to your numbers or to your admission that these numbers do not exist, and the comment about Islam growing by conversion more than immigration in the U.S. is your theory unsupported by evidence.
Meanwhile, why devote so much to explaining that some percentage of Islam includes ghetto or African Americans? WTH? Why is the color of their skin or economic status noteworthy in discussing population numbers? Regardless of color of skin and economic status, they COUNT. Moreover, Islam does not care about the color of anyone's skin or economic status.
Because when a new concept or product makes inroads in the market, the sponsors of this concept of products usually pay attention to the demographics of their customers. Let's flip this around. If the majority of the Muslim converts in the U.S. were Harvard graduates, I would bet my firstborn that this fact will be present in every single piece of dawa literature CAIR hands out. So it seems equally legitimate to present the analysis of the real population of American Muslims and to note where most of them come from. These are the forgotten Muslims whose voice has never been included in the political Muslim discourse - simply because this population doesn't have the wherewithal to become political. But they are Muslims nevertheless, and they have specific needs and challenges. It isn't becoming of you to insist that they a)don't exist, or b) are Muslims like any other. The challenges faced by this population are very different from those faced by immigrant Muslims. Yet Muslim discourse in America is shaped by wealthy immigrant Muslims.
Islam may not care about anyone's skin color or economic status. But Muslims do.
People from France to African Americans are converting and in God's eyes their devotion is equal. Perhaps this is why so many African Americans do convert to Islam- they feel welcomed in Islam.
African-Americans convert to Islam for many reasons. If you want to talk about that population intelligently, do a bit of reading and progress to beyond "perhaps." They aren't like you. Their problems are not like your problems.
However, what I described to you in previous pages was the face of the new Muslim. The new Muslim will be a blend of mixed races. And every successive generation will be more wealthy. Iranian Muslims, Arab Muslims, and Pakistan Muslims that are first generation are fairly wealthy and well educated. This pattern will continue. You would never recognize my kids as " Muslim" if you saw them. This is the new face of Islam. But the new generation is not losing their faith in the process of assimilation.
In the U.S., they are, because the U.S. enforces education and income barriers to entry. In Europe, not so. These Muslims aren't wealthy or educated.
I should also mention, for reality's sake, that Iranian Muslims are a separate population with whom mainstream Sunni Islam seeks no particular affiliation. You can spin your tales of Muslim unity when you succeed in eradicating the term "rafidah" from the Sunni discourse.
Soon there will be a Muslim on every block if not in every house. Everyone will know at least one Muslim. I am not trying to frighten you with this prediction; its simply the direction we are headed in. So its not wise to alienate such a large population by insults about our religion or references to people in our faith who live in ghetto's..
Oh dear. There are three Muslims in my house already. There is a certainly-Muslim child growing in my womb. You don't frighten me with Muslim anything. I lived among them all my life. I know Muslim reality, both here and elsewhere. The Muslim reality in the U.S. is this:
- the prediction of Muslims in every block, if not in every house, is not supported by demographic evidence, unless your definition of "soon" differs from most people mean. If you brought numbers to show the forecast of Muslim population in the U.S, that'd be different. But all you brought is your own passion. Very nice, eh, but unconvincing.
Realistic criticism of your religion is not an insult, unless you a sort of Muslim to whom everyone who doesn't like Islam is an offender.
It's not an insult to say many Muslim-Americans hail from the ghetto. They do. That's their economic and demographic reality. If you don't like the word ghetto, how about this: many Muslim-Americans are black, poor, have below-high school education and often a prison record. They are also ignored by wealthy immigrant Muslims who think their voices are enough to shape Muslim discourse in America.
Polite enough for you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have heard of Christian missionary groups but I have never heard of Muslim missionary groups, have you? I worked with refugee Muslim families and they told me about Christian missionary groups on the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. They are impoverished Muslim families and the familes tell me that Christian missionary groups sweep in, providing baskets of food and water but also quite a few brochures on "Jesus, our Savior." lol Honestly, Muslims NEVER want people to convert under compulsion or coercion. It has to be through revelation and divine guidance. Muslima was speaking in "flowery" terms not because she was proselytizing, but simply because she clearly is devoted and loves her faith. Nothing wrong with that! It just irritated the hell out of you that she spoke so positively about her faith, thats all.
I think Muslima and I have been informative and answered questions to the best of our ability. I think we've done a fine job. I'm glad that now this thread will permanently remain with links included for people to learn more about true Islam. My intention was never to convert anyone, but simply to remove some of the hatred and vile accusations against a religion that is dear to billions of people.
It apparently irritates the hell out of you that we aren't convinced by all the flowery language from you and Muslima, instead we want actual truth.
We all know that there is just one poster--a single poster--who called Mohammed a pedophile. S/he probably did that fewer times than you besmirched Mary.
So, obviously, your real problem is with all the corrections people have made to Muslima's flowery but deceptive language. Which is odd, because these corrections are nothing more than to point out rules that actually exist in Islam.
Do you really think that spelling out Islam's rules is hateful and vile?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like your fantasy more than any possible reality.
Also, why did you assume PP's reference to African American converts was somehow pejorative? I didn't read it that way. This seems to be your problem, not hers.
Also, ghettos not ghetto's.
So why mention it? And why mention ghettos? Just lunchtime table convo?