Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, so You think that your Blasian, Eurasian, Mulatto, etc, child is more genetically superior to my child. I doubt that your child is any more healthy, fit, intelligent than my child, who is the progeny of an African American woman with family ties of two-centuries in this country and a second generation Ethiopian American. We are of the same race. And your child is definitely not superior to mine.

To refer to anyone as "mulatto" is highly offensive.

No it isn't.

It's not that common, but it's not a pejorative.

Seriously? Who the fuck are you to tell me what I should be offended by? Are you biracial? If I ever heard you referring to my children as 'mulatto', you would NEVER use that word again in your life.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, so You think that your Blasian, Eurasian, Mulatto, etc, child is more genetically superior to my child. I doubt that your child is any more healthy, fit, intelligent than my child, who is the progeny of an African American woman with family ties of two-centuries in this country and a second generation Ethiopian American. We are of the same race. And your child is definitely not superior to mine.

To refer to anyone as "mulatto" is highly offensive.

No it isn't.

It's not that common, but it's not a pejorative.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does any of this have to do with Cheerios???

Unfortunately, there are some people who think that keeping a low gene pool is productive for the human species. Yeah-I don't get the appeal of cousins, either.

What is with you and the obsession with incest?

Not me, but there are some people who don't understand that genetic diversity is actually an incredibly important thing.

Being mixed race does not automatically mean that you are "genetically diverse." Even being "genetically diverse" does not mean you are automatically more healthy or more attractive, which is what you have been claiming. You have been weirdly insistent that being mixed race is superior, which is just sort of weird. You are out of your depth here.

I've never argued that "mixed race" is superior, but that genetic diversity absolutely does trend towards making healthier humans - and with that, better looking humans - better "fitness" (evolutionary speaking). Please explain to me how a small genetic pool is somehow beneficial for the human species.

Okay, so You think that your Blasian, Eurasian, Mulatto, etc, child is more genetically superior to my child. I doubt that your child is any more healthy, fit, intelligent than my child, who is the progeny of an African American woman with family ties of two-centuries in this country and a second generation Ethiopian American. We are of the same race. And your child is definitely not superior to mine.

Ah, we've finally gotten to the crux of this - your insecurities about your special snowflake. How dare anyone say that your special snowflake isn't the best of the best? I'll make a special participation trophy for your child.

I am glad that you understand. Now carry on with racist rants. Oh maybe your insecurities are that you have to overcompensate because you don't fit in anywhere. Never an insider. Always an outsider trying to fit in.

Are you the person against interracial marriage? FYI you can still be Black of African American, and be a racist and bigot.

Well no I am not. I am very much aware that people of all races have their varying prejudices. Yours seem to be against those who are not in an interracial relationship, or parents of biracial children.

what the hell? where are you getting this from? where did i saythis??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, so You think that your Blasian, Eurasian, Mulatto, etc, child is more genetically superior to my child. I doubt that your child is any more healthy, fit, intelligent than my child, who is the progeny of an African American woman with family ties of two-centuries in this country and a second generation Ethiopian American. We are of the same race. And your child is definitely not superior to mine.

To refer to anyone as "mulatto" is highly offensive.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, so You think that your Blasian, Eurasian, Mulatto, etc, child is more genetically superior to my child. I doubt that your child is any more healthy, fit, intelligent than my child, who is the progeny of an African American woman with family ties of two-centuries in this country and a second generation Ethiopian American. We are of the same race. And your child is definitely not superior to mine.

To refer to anyone as "mulatto" is highly offensive.

Anonymous wrote:Okay, so You think that your Blasian, Eurasian, Mulatto, etc, child is more genetically superior to my child. I doubt that your child is any more healthy, fit, intelligent than my child, who is the progeny of an African American woman with family ties of two-centuries in this country and a second generation Ethiopian American. We are of the same race. And your child is definitely not superior to mine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does any of this have to do with Cheerios???

Unfortunately, there are some people who think that keeping a low gene pool is productive for the human species. Yeah-I don't get the appeal of cousins, either.

What is with you and the obsession with incest?

Not me, but there are some people who don't understand that genetic diversity is actually an incredibly important thing.

Being mixed race does not automatically mean that you are "genetically diverse." Even being "genetically diverse" does not mean you are automatically more healthy or more attractive, which is what you have been claiming. You have been weirdly insistent that being mixed race is superior, which is just sort of weird. You are out of your depth here.

I've never argued that "mixed race" is superior, but that genetic diversity absolutely does trend towards making healthier humans - and with that, better looking humans - better "fitness" (evolutionary speaking). Please explain to me how a small genetic pool is somehow beneficial for the human species.

Okay, so You think that your Blasian, Eurasian, Mulatto, etc, child is more genetically superior to my child. I doubt that your child is any more healthy, fit, intelligent than my child, who is the progeny of an African American woman with family ties of two-centuries in this country and a second generation Ethiopian American. We are of the same race. And your child is definitely not superior to mine.

Ah, we've finally gotten to the crux of this - your insecurities about your special snowflake. How dare anyone say that your special snowflake isn't the best of the best? I'll make a special participation trophy for your child.

I am glad that you understand. Now carry on with racist rants. Oh maybe your insecurities are that you have to overcompensate because you don't fit in anywhere. Never an insider. Always an outsider trying to fit in.

Are you the person against interracial marriage? FYI you can still be Black of African American, and be a racist and bigot.

Well no I am not. I am very much aware that people of all races have their varying prejudices. Yours seem to be against those who are not in an interracial relationship, or parents of biracial children.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does any of this have to do with Cheerios???

Unfortunately, there are some people who think that keeping a low gene pool is productive for the human species. Yeah-I don't get the appeal of cousins, either.

What is with you and the obsession with incest?

Not me, but there are some people who don't understand that genetic diversity is actually an incredibly important thing.

Being mixed race does not automatically mean that you are "genetically diverse." Even being "genetically diverse" does not mean you are automatically more healthy or more attractive, which is what you have been claiming. You have been weirdly insistent that being mixed race is superior, which is just sort of weird. You are out of your depth here.

I've never argued that "mixed race" is superior, but that genetic diversity absolutely does trend towards making healthier humans - and with that, better looking humans - better "fitness" (evolutionary speaking). Please explain to me how a small genetic pool is somehow beneficial for the human species.

Okay, so You think that your Blasian, Eurasian, Mulatto, etc, child is more genetically superior to my child. I doubt that your child is any more healthy, fit, intelligent than my child, who is the progeny of an African American woman with family ties of two-centuries in this country and a second generation Ethiopian American. We are of the same race. And your child is definitely not superior to mine.

Ah, we've finally gotten to the crux of this - your insecurities about your special snowflake. How dare anyone say that your special snowflake isn't the best of the best? I'll make a special participation trophy for your child.

I am glad that you understand. Now carry on with racist rants. Oh maybe your insecurities are that you have to overcompensate because you don't fit in anywhere. Never an insider. Always an outsider trying to fit in.

Are you the person against interracial marriage? FYI you can still be Black of African American, and be a racist and bigot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does any of this have to do with Cheerios???

Unfortunately, there are some people who think that keeping a low gene pool is productive for the human species. Yeah-I don't get the appeal of cousins, either.

What is with you and the obsession with incest?

Not me, but there are some people who don't understand that genetic diversity is actually an incredibly important thing.

Being mixed race does not automatically mean that you are "genetically diverse." Even being "genetically diverse" does not mean you are automatically more healthy or more attractive, which is what you have been claiming. You have been weirdly insistent that being mixed race is superior, which is just sort of weird. You are out of your depth here.

I've never argued that "mixed race" is superior, but that genetic diversity absolutely does trend towards making healthier humans - and with that, better looking humans - better "fitness" (evolutionary speaking). Please explain to me how a small genetic pool is somehow beneficial for the human species.

Okay, so You think that your Blasian, Eurasian, Mulatto, etc, child is more genetically superior to my child. I doubt that your child is any more healthy, fit, intelligent than my child, who is the progeny of an African American woman with family ties of two-centuries in this country and a second generation Ethiopian American. We are of the same race. And your child is definitely not superior to mine.

Ah, we've finally gotten to the crux of this - your insecurities about your special snowflake. How dare anyone say that your special snowflake isn't the best of the best? I'll make a special participation trophy for your child.

I am glad that you understand. Now carry on with racist rants. Oh maybe your insecurities are that you have to overcompensate because you don't fit in anywhere. Never an insider. Always an outsider trying to fit in.

Are you the person against interracial marriage? FYI you can still be Black of African American, and be a racist and bigot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does any of this have to do with Cheerios???

Unfortunately, there are some people who think that keeping a low gene pool is productive for the human species. Yeah-I don't get the appeal of cousins, either.

What is with you and the obsession with incest?

Not me, but there are some people who don't understand that genetic diversity is actually an incredibly important thing.

Being mixed race does not automatically mean that you are "genetically diverse." Even being "genetically diverse" does not mean you are automatically more healthy or more attractive, which is what you have been claiming. You have been weirdly insistent that being mixed race is superior, which is just sort of weird. You are out of your depth here.

I've never argued that "mixed race" is superior, but that genetic diversity absolutely does trend towards making healthier humans - and with that, better looking humans - better "fitness" (evolutionary speaking). Please explain to me how a small genetic pool is somehow beneficial for the human species.

Okay, so You think that your Blasian, Eurasian, Mulatto, etc, child is more genetically superior to my child. I doubt that your child is any more healthy, fit, intelligent than my child, who is the progeny of an African American woman with family ties of two-centuries in this country and a second generation Ethiopian American. We are of the same race. And your child is definitely not superior to mine.

Ah, we've finally gotten to the crux of this - your insecurities about your special snowflake. How dare anyone say that your special snowflake isn't the best of the best? I'll make a special participation trophy for your child.

I am glad that you understand. Now carry on with racist rants. Oh maybe your insecurities are that you have to overcompensate because you don't fit in anywhere. Never an insider. Always an outsider trying to fit in.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does any of this have to do with Cheerios???

Unfortunately, there are some people who think that keeping a low gene pool is productive for the human species. Yeah-I don't get the appeal of cousins, either.

What is with you and the obsession with incest?

Not me, but there are some people who don't understand that genetic diversity is actually an incredibly important thing.

Being mixed race does not automatically mean that you are "genetically diverse." Even being "genetically diverse" does not mean you are automatically more healthy or more attractive, which is what you have been claiming. You have been weirdly insistent that being mixed race is superior, which is just sort of weird. You are out of your depth here.

I've never argued that "mixed race" is superior, but that genetic diversity absolutely does trend towards making healthier humans - and with that, better looking humans - better "fitness" (evolutionary speaking). Please explain to me how a small genetic pool is somehow beneficial for the human species.

Okay, so You think that your Blasian, Eurasian, Mulatto, etc, child is more genetically superior to my child. I doubt that your child is any more healthy, fit, intelligent than my child, who is the progeny of an African American woman with family ties of two-centuries in this country and a second generation Ethiopian American. We are of the same race. And your child is definitely not superior to mine.

Ah, we've finally gotten to the crux of this - your insecurities about your special snowflake. How dare anyone say that your special snowflake isn't the best of the best? I'll make a special participation trophy for your child.

I am glad that you understand. Now carry on with racist rants. Oh maybe your insecurities are that you have to overcompensate because you don't fit in anywhere. Never an insider. Always an outsider trying to fit in.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does any of this have to do with Cheerios???

Unfortunately, there are some people who think that keeping a low gene pool is productive for the human species. Yeah-I don't get the appeal of cousins, either.

What is with you and the obsession with incest?

Not me, but there are some people who don't understand that genetic diversity is actually an incredibly important thing.

Being mixed race does not automatically mean that you are "genetically diverse." Even being "genetically diverse" does not mean you are automatically more healthy or more attractive, which is what you have been claiming. You have been weirdly insistent that being mixed race is superior, which is just sort of weird. You are out of your depth here.

I've never argued that "mixed race" is superior, but that genetic diversity absolutely does trend towards making healthier humans - and with that, better looking humans - better "fitness" (evolutionary speaking). Please explain to me how a small genetic pool is somehow beneficial for the human species.

Okay, so You think that your Blasian, Eurasian, Mulatto, etc, child is more genetically superior to my child. I doubt that your child is any more healthy, fit, intelligent than my child, who is the progeny of an African American woman with family ties of two-centuries in this country and a second generation Ethiopian American. We are of the same race. And your child is definitely not superior to mine.

Ah, we've finally gotten to the crux of this - your insecurities about your special snowflake. How dare anyone say that your special snowflake isn't the best of the best? I'll make a special participation trophy for your child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does any of this have to do with Cheerios???

Unfortunately, there are some people who think that keeping a low gene pool is productive for the human species. Yeah-I don't get the appeal of cousins, either.

What is with you and the obsession with incest?

Not me, but there are some people who don't understand that genetic diversity is actually an incredibly important thing.

Being mixed race does not automatically mean that you are "genetically diverse." Even being "genetically diverse" does not mean you are automatically more healthy or more attractive, which is what you have been claiming. You have been weirdly insistent that being mixed race is superior, which is just sort of weird. You are out of your depth here.

I've never argued that "mixed race" is superior, but that genetic diversity absolutely does trend towards making healthier humans - and with that, better looking humans - better "fitness" (evolutionary speaking). Please explain to me how a small genetic pool is somehow beneficial for the human species.

Okay, so You think that your Blasian, Eurasian, Mulatto, etc, child is more genetically superior to my child. I doubt that your child is any more healthy, fit, intelligent than my child, who is the progeny of an African American woman with family ties of two-centuries in this country and a second generation Ethiopian American. We are of the same race. And your child is definitely not superior to mine.