Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every single YY parent who has ever posted on this stupid forum has said they would prefer dual immersion. PERIOD. WTF is wrong with you people?
You mean on this particular thread? True. But there were a couple tense boards last year, and more in 2011, where one PP after another wrote of being glad that there weren't more bilingual Chinese at YY, arguing against two lotteries (how else would you get a dual immersion program in this particular city? If somebody knows, tell us). Who could forget those threads. I didn't post, and did't draw my wife's attention to those conversations, in the hopes that she'd visit the school with an open mind.
Anonymous wrote:
(And what do your ILs think of white people? I know lots of white people at YY.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every single YY parent who has ever posted on this stupid forum has said they would prefer dual immersion. PERIOD. WTF is wrong with you people?
You mean on this particular thread? True. But there were a couple tense boards last year, and more in 2011, where one PP after another wrote of being glad that there weren't more bilingual Chinese at YY, arguing against two lotteries (how else would you get a dual immersion program in this particular city? If somebody knows, tell us). Who could forget those threads. I didn't post, and did't draw my wife's attention to those conversations, in the hopes that she'd visit the school with an open mind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every single YY parent who has ever posted on this stupid forum has said they would prefer dual immersion. PERIOD. WTF is wrong with you people?
You mean on this particular thread? True. But there were a couple tense boards last year, and more in 2011, where one PP after another wrote of being glad that there weren't more bilingual Chinese at YY, arguing against two lotteries (how else would you get a dual immersion program in this particular city? If somebody knows, tell us). Who could forget those threads. I didn't post, and did't draw my wife's attention to those conversations, in the hopes that she'd visit the school with an open mind.
Anonymous wrote:
Regarding what your IL think and feel about AA, how is that relevant to YY?
What kind of question is that? YY's student body is nearly half AA, and a tiny minority bilingual Chinese. At the open house, my wife asked a question in Mandarin (she was thinking in Chinese and it came out that way), an exercise that didn't cheer her up. Nobody else in the room where the slideshow was viewed seemed able to speak any dialect.
Anonymous wrote:Every single YY parent who has ever posted on this stupid forum has said they would prefer dual immersion. PERIOD. WTF is wrong with you people?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People have commented that the question was on this year's application. So, it is obviously back. As a YY parent, I think YY should follow Lamb, and flaunt the law. Apparently the DCPC board does not care. And, it would be in YY's best interest. If Lamb can do it and get away with it, YY, Stokes, MV, Sela, and DC Bilingual should also flaunt the law. Two-way immersion would be great for YY, and the charter board cannot penalize YY without also penalizing LAMB, right.
Go, PP! Moxie is your middle name.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course this YY parent would like more two-way immersion...don't know of any YY parent who would be against this.
This YY parent knows boatloads of others who would be against two-way if it hurt their chances of being admitted, which of course it would unless the school and DCPC were doing something radically different. They might not say so, but they wouldn't support dual immersion. They just want a decent school (better than most IB on Capitol Hill, in Petworth, or wherever) where their kid learns more than a little of a foreign language. They get that and they're satisfied. You are an unusually sophisticated and Chinese-minded YY parent to want more!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course this YY parent would like more two-way immersion...don't know of any YY parent who would be against this.
This YY parent knows boatloads of others who would be against two-way if it hurt their chances of being admitted, which of course it would unless the school and DCPC were doing something radically different. They might not say so, but they wouldn't support dual immersion. They just want a decent school (better than most IB on Capitol Hill, in Petworth, or wherever) where their kid learns more than a little of a foreign language. They get that and they're satisfied. You are an unusually sophisticated and Chinese-minded YY parent to want more!
You're saying that parents whose children have already been admitted are afraid that they'll be shut out? How is that possible?
It isn't possible. They are already in. The only people who care are the ones who desperately want a spot and are looking for any angle that'll get them an advantage and preference in the lottery.
All the smoke and mirrors about how much it will be better for the school and all is secondary to getting them oneupmanship in the lottery.
Everyone wants more bilingual kids in the program, of course, but not enough to give them preference or to run a dual lottery.
It isn't possible. They are already in. The only people who care are the ones who desperately want a spot and are looking for any angle that'll get them an advantage and preference in the lottery.
All the smoke and mirrors about how much it will be better for the school and all is secondary to getting them oneupmanship in the lottery.
Everyone wants more bilingual kids in the program, of course, but not enough to give them preference or to run a dual lottery.
Anonymous wrote:People have commented that the question was on this year's application. So, it is obviously back. As a YY parent, I think YY should follow Lamb, and flaunt the law. Apparently the DCPC board does not care. And, it would be in YY's best interest. If Lamb can do it and get away with it, YY, Stokes, MV, Sela, and DC Bilingual should also flaunt the law. Two-way immersion would be great for YY, and the charter board cannot penalize YY without also penalizing LAMB, right.