Anonymous wrote:
Preach! If you want your kid to stay with their cohort through 12 grade, then pay for private. If not, then socialized, government school it is. Some will loose, when ithe decisions benefit the majority.
Anonymous wrote:SLHS is losing a lot of kids, though not as many as Westfield.
They are losing 300-400. going from 99% full to 83% full.
Westfield is losing @700-800 and going down to 74%.
Anonymous wrote:Get rid of IB. People have been screaming this for over 20 years.
There used to be information on the cost difference to FCPS and it was significant. However, I cannot seem to find it now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed no one from Westfield is raging in here
I am reasonably certain that is why Westfield is going to end up losing so many students with limited backfill. The Centreville and Chantilly families have been very vocal about not wanting to move and Westfield has been quiet.
The people who have made the most noise got what they wanted. Crossfield is unhappy because it got what it wanted just not in a way that they wanted it.
Well, the families who aren't being zoned out of Westfield can't really advocate for...other neighborhoods to be moved in? How would that work exactly, without sounding totally racist and classist?
It's FCPS's responsibility---that they are abdicating completely--to make fair decisions on behalf of all the schools.
Sure they can. South Lakes and Langley groups have been very vocal in the past about which areas they did and did not want rezoned to their schools, and they got their way in 2008 and 2021.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed no one from Westfield is raging in here
I am reasonably certain that is why Westfield is going to end up losing so many students with limited backfill. The Centreville and Chantilly families have been very vocal about not wanting to move and Westfield has been quiet.
The people who have made the most noise got what they wanted. Crossfield is unhappy because it got what it wanted just not in a way that they wanted it.
Well, the families who aren't being zoned out of Westfield can't really advocate for...other neighborhoods to be moved in? How would that work exactly, without sounding totally racist and classist?
It's FCPS's responsibility---that they are abdicating completely--to make fair decisions on behalf of all the schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed no one from Westfield is raging in here
I am reasonably certain that is why Westfield is going to end up losing so many students with limited backfill. The Centreville and Chantilly families have been very vocal about not wanting to move and Westfield has been quiet.
The people who have made the most noise got what they wanted. Crossfield is unhappy because it got what it wanted just not in a way that they wanted it.
Well, the families who aren't being zoned out of Westfield can't really advocate for...other neighborhoods to be moved in? How would that work exactly, without sounding totally racist and classist?
It's FCPS's responsibility---that they are abdicating completely--to make fair decisions on behalf of all the schools.
It is up to Westfield families to be demanding backfill and not ot be allowed to drop towhatever percentage they are at.
What percentage is SLHS going to be? I don't think they are losing that many kids, the Floris and Fox Mill groups are pretty small. I know the SLHS PTA didn't seem to think that the 45 or so 9th graders that opted in to Skyview was that big a deal, it was like 4% of the overall student body.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed no one from Westfield is raging in here
Well, half their students are being moved out and those families are happy.
For a school community to lose half their students and a third of their teachers is really terrible. I can't think of the last time FCPS disrupted and screwed over an existing HS to this extent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed no one from Westfield is raging in here
I am reasonably certain that is why Westfield is going to end up losing so many students with limited backfill. The Centreville and Chantilly families have been very vocal about not wanting to move and Westfield has been quiet.
The people who have made the most noise got what they wanted. Crossfield is unhappy because it got what it wanted just not in a way that they wanted it.
Well, the families who aren't being zoned out of Westfield can't really advocate for...other neighborhoods to be moved in? How would that work exactly, without sounding totally racist and classist?
It's FCPS's responsibility---that they are abdicating completely--to make fair decisions on behalf of all the schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed no one from Westfield is raging in here
I am reasonably certain that is why Westfield is going to end up losing so many students with limited backfill. The Centreville and Chantilly families have been very vocal about not wanting to move and Westfield has been quiet.
The people who have made the most noise got what they wanted. Crossfield is unhappy because it got what it wanted just not in a way that they wanted it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its absolutely insane that they did not move those Herndon kids over to a closer school and left them at Oakton in both scenarios.
Literally one of the reasons they bought the school was to reduce overcrowding at *OAKTON* and to keep those kids from having to go such a long way to school.
Now both scenarios have no one moving out of Oakton, but leaving South Lakes and Westfield without enough students.
It makes no sense.
A school in the perfect location falls into their lap and they still manage to make a complete disaster out of it.
And the self-dealing by Seema Dixit and apparently, Kyle McDaniel, needs to be reviewed by an FCPS ethics office.
Actually, FCPS first said they bought the school to reduce overcrowding at Centreville, Chantilly, and Westfields.
In the initial October meetings when they started the boundary conversations, Oakton wasn't overcrowded. Now, magically, it is. Does anyone else find that fascinating?
I"m not sure why that's "fascinating". Either a school is overcrowded, or it isn't. This is a knowable fact.
Oakton is overcrowded right now, at 103% capacity. And it is overcrowded in both potential scenarios, which is ridiculous given how close some kids zoned for Oakton live to high schools projected to have hundreds of empty seats.
Well, the target is 85-105%. Oakton is on target.
Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed no one from Westfield is raging in here