Anonymous wrote:The difference between you and I is that I would be happy for a team whether it was Stoneridge, Bullis, Visi or Potomac or any local team. I would not be hating on a team as a sore loser or trying to be negative. No one is sensitive and no expects to win it every year but definitely happy for local teams being ranked and winning! We all know players on all these teams so we do not hope for the worst for them unlike you. Sorry you lost this year. SSSA will be just fine next year and will definitely be in the running for all the banners and championships again. Good luck to all the ISL team players and the 2028s gearing up for summer recruiting tourneys.

Anonymous wrote:Seriously? This is a '27 thread right? Can the SSSAS crew stop with the self congratulatory victory lap? You didn't play a single ranked opponent so your record means little. It certainly doesn't mean you should be ranked above GC no matter which source you quote. You played 2 maybe 3 decent teams and lost to one of them at home. If I were a parent there I would've wanted to play a tougher schedule, but somehow even pointing this out will trigger ALL CAPS responses, a hater or troll reference or some kind of you should be ashamed as my daughter was injured crap. Have some level of self awareness and let's move on to 2027 and your program's irrelevance therein. Bye Felicia.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously? This is a '27 thread right? Can the SSSAS crew stop with the self congratulatory victory lap? You didn't play a single ranked opponent so your record means little. It certainly doesn't mean you should be ranked above GC no matter which source you quote. You played 2 maybe 3 decent teams and lost to one of them at home. If I were a parent there I would've wanted to play a tougher schedule, but somehow even pointing this out will trigger ALL CAPS responses, a hater or troll reference or some kind of you should be ashamed as my daughter was injured crap. Have some level of self awareness and let's move on to 2027 and your program's irrelevance therein. Bye Felicia.

If it makes you feel any better many 27s have already heard how terrible they are from no less than their very own. So maybe you can hold off for a bit.

Anonymous wrote:No one uses laxnumbers for for the above reasons. Terrible algorithm and analytics.


The most widely used and recognized rankings are by Inside Lacrosse and USA Lacrosse. You know that already so you pull out the one from laxnumbers that is all wonky and no one pays attention ever or follows. Haters gonna hate…

Congrats to all the teams ranked in these polls especially our local teams!
https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/q-collar-girls-high-school-national-top-25-upstate-intrigue/826ca6e2-339b-47fe-9cca-f21d72ebff9b

https://www.usalacrosse.com/magazine/usa-lacrosse-high-school-girls-national-top-25-rankings

Anonymous wrote:Seriously? This is a '27 thread right? Can the SSSAS crew stop with the self congratulatory victory lap? You didn't play a single ranked opponent so your record means little. It certainly doesn't mean you should be ranked above GC no matter which source you quote. You played 2 maybe 3 decent teams and lost to one of them at home. If I were a parent there I would've wanted to play a tougher schedule, but somehow even pointing this out will trigger ALL CAPS responses, a hater or troll reference or some kind of you should be ashamed as my daughter was injured crap. Have some level of self awareness and let's move on to 2027 and your program's irrelevance therein. Bye Felicia.

Anonymous wrote:No one uses laxnumbers for for the above reasons. Terrible algorithm and analytics.


The most widely used and recognized rankings are by Inside Lacrosse and USA Lacrosse. You know that already so you pull out the one from laxnumbers that is all wonky and no one pays attention ever or follows. Haters gonna hate…

Congrats to all the teams ranked in these polls especially our local teams!
https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/q-collar-girls-high-school-national-top-25-upstate-intrigue/826ca6e2-339b-47fe-9cca-f21d72ebff9b

https://www.usalacrosse.com/magazine/usa-lacrosse-high-school-girls-national-top-25-rankings

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the SSSAS team this year was so good, why is their laxnumber rating so low for a team with one loss? The SR team from 2024 was almost 24% better than this year's Saints squad. And that team had freshmen that not only played but started.

As others have pointed out, their strength of schedule was lower. Lax number is the only ranking to take SOS into account and so the only one that makes any actual sense

Not an SSSAS backer but laxnumbers is probably the worst ranking because it’s all algorithms and SOS is based off of the other teams terrible rankings.