Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not much name recognition vs Williams, Amherst, and Bowdoin.
Agree with this. I was impressed with their advising which seems strong. Liked that each kid gets more than one advisor. Seems like a supportive place. Did not like what we heard about the divide on campus, which was heard firsthand from current students who are not that happy there. The area seemed...meh.
My kid liked other places better but it was on the list. Nothing super special about it.
The only "divide" on campus is that of the two different architectural styles which is the result of the merger with Kirkland.
this person keeps saying this which is so weird because it's the opposite of what we heard from current students who go there. why are you so invested in claiming otherwise?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamilton claims to have an open curriculum, but it doesn't. It actually has requirements, including PE. It's fine to have requirements but don't claim you have an open curriculum when you really don't.
By this standard, no highly selective college offers an open curriculum.
not true I can think of two others off the top of my head
Two unnameable others?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not much name recognition vs Williams, Amherst, and Bowdoin.
Lol. Bowdoin has very little name recognition. Amherst and Williams perhaps slightly more. Your connection to Bowdoin shows.
I’ve never heard of Hamilton and I spent seven years in Cambridge, Boston. And it’s $91,500. Make sure it’s worth that to you
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not much name recognition vs Williams, Amherst, and Bowdoin.
Lol. Bowdoin has very little name recognition. Amherst and Williams perhaps slightly more. Your connection to Bowdoin shows.
I’ve never heard of Hamilton and I spent seven years in Cambridge, Boston. And it’s $91,500. Make sure it’s worth that to you
Anonymous wrote:I thought it was interesting that Obama chose to speak there back in April. I have no idea why he chose Hamilton. Maybe someone raised this on the prior 15 pages of this thread.
My view is if Hamiton is good enough for Obama, it’s good enough.
Anonymous wrote:Hamilton was DC’s ED2 thought if they hadn’t gotten into Swarthmore this week - know this is common for Hamilton, back up for top SLACs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamilton claims to have an open curriculum, but it doesn't. It actually has requirements, including PE. It's fine to have requirements but don't claim you have an open curriculum when you really don't.
By this standard, no highly selective college offers an open curriculum.
not true I can think of two others off the top of my head
Two unnameable others?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamilton claims to have an open curriculum, but it doesn't. It actually has requirements, including PE. It's fine to have requirements but don't claim you have an open curriculum when you really don't.
By this standard, no highly selective college offers an open curriculum.
not true I can think of two others off the top of my head
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hamilton claims to have an open curriculum, but it doesn't. It actually has requirements, including PE. It's fine to have requirements but don't claim you have an open curriculum when you really don't.
By this standard, no highly selective college offers an open curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not much name recognition vs Williams, Amherst, and Bowdoin.
Lol. Bowdoin has very little name recognition. Amherst and Williams perhaps slightly more. Your connection to Bowdoin shows.
I’ve never heard of Hamilton and I spent seven years in Cambridge, Boston. And it’s $91,500. Make sure it’s worth that to you
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not much name recognition vs Williams, Amherst, and Bowdoin.
Lol. Bowdoin has very little name recognition. Amherst and Williams perhaps slightly more. Your connection to Bowdoin shows.
Anonymous wrote:Hamilton claims to have an open curriculum, but it doesn't. It actually has requirements, including PE. It's fine to have requirements but don't claim you have an open curriculum when you really don't.