Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vanity Fair: hey maybe it wouldn’t be great if we hired a reporter who sleeps with her subjects

I don’t believe that they’re “reviewing their ties” to her. They hired her - as an editor - when they knew she was sexting RFK Jr. and they were more than willing to hawk her shitty book. They’re just annoyed people are finding out how batshit she truly is

Yeah but now that her ex says she’s had an affair with Sanford, another prominent old pol she wrote about, plus highlighting the Olbermann relationship, she really does look truly nuts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She seems very troubled.

She should be a stay at home mom right now in Connecticut married to a guy her age who works in finance. Instead she’s this thirsty political hack reporter. It’s all so…pointless and embarrassing.

That’s what she would love but she doesn’t come form that background. If she could she would.

She does not come from wealth.

She's pretty enough. She can't attract one Wall Street financier?

She's not pretty enough anymore and she's old. Handsome successful desirable men her age are generally not single and the few who are want someone prettier and about 8 years younger, i.e. not a skank who sleeps with old men for material. Maybe she can get some boomer to knock her up like Karoline Leavitt.

Jesus Christ, what’s wrong with you?

It’s obvious Nuzzi needs some g.d. forever therapy. But Lizzie can GFH. I cannot even understand anyone pitying any of the men who pursued her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank you. The posters dancing to the beat of “she’s old and will be barren!” while this woman is 32 need to have several seats. Understanding that the misogynists can reach that particular low hanging fruit without getting off the couch, a dating history of Olberman/Lizza/Sanford/Kennedy with an overwrought book about the latter is plenty of material to work with.

Her ex says her phobia was being “old” and unwed — she defined “old” as after age 30. She turns 33 in January. Unwed and childless at 33 is old to 99% of the nation. To add, she’s now a radioactive national laughing stock, so, happy hunting for a spouse.

Right. She also thought RFK jr was an appropriate romantic prospect, so her beliefs are clearly insane on several fronts. You agreeing that women > 30 are old (and treating this as the ultimate insult as it's a proxy for desirability to old men) is a pretty hilarious self-own.

Also not you knowing when her birthday is. Speaking of "old", go creep on someone your own age, dude.

Her Wikipedia says she turns 33 in January.

Great. Like I said, stop creeping. Or, aim your criticism at her work like the rest of us.

Anonymous wrote:Vanity Fair: hey maybe it wouldn’t be great if we hired a reporter who sleeps with her subjects

She has an uncanny resemblance to Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank you. The posters dancing to the beat of “she’s old and will be barren!” while this woman is 32 need to have several seats. Understanding that the misogynists can reach that particular low hanging fruit without getting off the couch, a dating history of Olberman/Lizza/Sanford/Kennedy with an overwrought book about the latter is plenty of material to work with.

Her ex says her phobia was being “old” and unwed — she defined “old” as after age 30. She turns 33 in January. Unwed and childless at 33 is old to 99% of the nation. To add, she’s now a radioactive national laughing stock, so, happy hunting for a spouse.

Right. She also thought RFK jr was an appropriate romantic prospect, so her beliefs are clearly insane on several fronts. You agreeing that women > 30 are old (and treating this as the ultimate insult as it's a proxy for desirability to old men) is a pretty hilarious self-own.

Also not you knowing when her birthday is. Speaking of "old", go creep on someone your own age, dude.

Her Wikipedia says she turns 33 in January.

Anonymous wrote:Thank you. The posters dancing to the beat of “she’s old and will be barren!” while this woman is 32 need to have several seats. Understanding that the misogynists can reach that particular low hanging fruit without getting off the couch, a dating history of Olberman/Lizza/Sanford/Kennedy with an overwrought book about the latter is plenty of material to work with.

I don't think she's old and certainly not too old to get married. I got married at 34.

I think it's more that her obvious ambition is to be the "kept wife" of some powerful man, and she's likely too old for that, plus she's made such a mess of every single one of her relationships with powerful men that certainly at this point she's radioactive, right? Like Lizza and RFK and Sanford are obviously idiots who didn't recognize the existing red flags (and RFK and Sanford were both having illicit affairs with her, so the red flags were likely qualifying for that role). But at this point, what rich guy is going to roll the dice on her? Or even moderately well off? She clearly dives into these attachments to fill some bottomless pit of need and then, when the shine wears off, plumbs it for profit.

She has consigned herself to being a pariah.

Not letting these men off the hook, but I knew they were all gross before their association with Nuzzi.

VF is re-thinking it because it's more embarrassing to have been with Sandford than RFK Jr, all things considered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank you. The posters dancing to the beat of “she’s old and will be barren!” while this woman is 32 need to have several seats. Understanding that the misogynists can reach that particular low hanging fruit without getting off the couch, a dating history of Olberman/Lizza/Sanford/Kennedy with an overwrought book about the latter is plenty of material to work with.

Her ex says her phobia was being “old” and unwed — she defined “old” as after age 30. She turns 33 in January. Unwed and childless at 33 is old to 99% of the nation. To add, she’s now a radioactive national laughing stock, so, happy hunting for a spouse.

Right. She also thought RFK jr was an appropriate romantic prospect, so her beliefs are clearly insane on several fronts. You agreeing that women > 30 are old (and treating this as the ultimate insult as it's a proxy for desirability to old men) is a pretty hilarious self-own.

Also not you knowing when her birthday is. Speaking of "old", go creep on someone your own age, dude.

She has a grandpa fetish

So she wrote a book posturing that sexting RFK Jr was her one professional lapse but she’s actually been s’ing and f’ing (old) men for scoops for the last fifteen years? Yikes.

Anonymous wrote:Vanity Fair: hey maybe it wouldn’t be great if we hired a reporter who sleeps with her subjects

I don’t believe that they’re “reviewing their ties” to her. They hired her - as an editor - when they knew she was sexting RFK Jr. and they were more than willing to hawk her shitty book. They’re just annoyed people are finding out how batshit she truly is

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank you. The posters dancing to the beat of “she’s old and will be barren!” while this woman is 32 need to have several seats. Understanding that the misogynists can reach that particular low hanging fruit without getting off the couch, a dating history of Olberman/Lizza/Sanford/Kennedy with an overwrought book about the latter is plenty of material to work with.

Her ex says her phobia was being “old” and unwed — she defined “old” as after age 30. She turns 33 in January. Unwed and childless at 33 is old to 99% of the nation. To add, she’s now a radioactive national laughing stock, so, happy hunting for a spouse.

She can bag some rich geriatric MAGA like that Caroline Levitt’s grandpa-husband.