Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just because Iguana Bondi borrowed all the WH sharpies to redact documents doesn't mean unredacted documents don’t exist. The internet is forever. There’s a gang of sleuths.

Case 1:16-cv-07673-UA Document 4-1 Filed 10/03/16

(SANITIZED)

4. The parties were held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Each of the parties had other minor females and a number of guests of Mr. Epstein, including Defendant XXX at four of the parties I attended. I understood that both he and Mr. Epstein knew that I was 13 years old.

5. Defendant had contact with me at four different parties in the summer of 1994.
On the fourth and final encounter with Defendant during the course of this savage attack, I pleaded with Defendant to stop but he did not.

6. Defendant stated that I shouldn't ever say anything if I didn't want to disappear like XX, a 12-year-old female that was forced to be involved in the third incident with Defendant and that I had not seen since that third incident, and that he was capable of having my whole family killed.

What is this from? Who is the Defendant?

Anonymous wrote:Just because Iguana Bondi borrowed all the WH sharpies to redact documents doesn't mean unredacted documents don’t exist. The internet is forever. There’s a gang of sleuths.

Case 1:16-cv-07673-UA Document 4-1 Filed 10/03/16

(SANITIZED)

4. The parties were held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Each of the parties had other minor females and a number of guests of Mr. Epstein, including Defendant XXX at four of the parties I attended. I understood that both he and Mr. Epstein knew that I was 13 years old.

5. Defendant had contact with me at four different parties in the summer of 1994.
On the fourth and final encounter with Defendant during the course of this savage attack, I pleaded with Defendant to stop but he did not.

6. Defendant stated that I shouldn't ever say anything if I didn't want to disappear like XX, a 12-year-old female that was forced to be involved in the third incident with Defendant and that I had not seen since that third incident, and that he was capable of having my whole family killed.

Anonymous wrote:Just because Iguana Bondi borrowed all the WH sharpies to redact documents doesn't mean unredacted documents don’t exist. The internet is forever. There’s a gang of sleuths.

Case 1:16-cv-07673-UA Document 4-1 Filed 10/03/16

(SANITIZED)

4. The parties were held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Each of the parties had other minor females and a number of guests of Mr. Epstein, including Defendant XXX at four of the parties I attended. I understood that both he and Mr. Epstein knew that I was 13 years old.

5. Defendant had contact with me at four different parties in the summer of 1994.
On the fourth and final encounter with Defendant during the course of this savage attack, I pleaded with Defendant to stop but he did not.

6. Defendant stated that I shouldn't ever say anything if I didn't want to disappear like XX, a 12-year-old female that was forced to be involved in the third incident with Defendant and that I had not seen since that third incident, and that he was capable of having my whole family killed.

Anonymous wrote:

OMG, I just realized something..

The real scandal in these emails isn’t Trump and Epstein—it’s Michael Wolff, a leading journalist, COACHING a convicted sex offender on how to manipulate a presidential candidate for personal and political gain.

This is very serious actually…

Take Wolff’s books for example— Fire and Fury, Siege, Landslide — which he profited off of Trump’s presidency for millions.

Now we know that Wolff was advising Epstein during the campaign… Every explosive claim in those books is now under a cloud of conflict of interest.

Why isn’t anyone talking about this?
Why was a “journalist” coaching a pedophile??? 👀

Anonymous wrote:Larry Summers looks bad in all of this.

He said something like,”I don’t want to be in a gift giving competition if I am the friend without benefits.”

It is such a pay to play world: disgusting.

Their disrespect of women reeks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Epstein was in Trump Tower AFTER the 2016 election.

Why would he be in Trump Tower if Trump had declared him persona non grata years earlier?

But this is not surprising. The only surprising thing is why Trump cares.

IT takes a dump on the WH narrative that Trump disassociated himself from Epstein in 2007, doesn't it?

I think Trump is a lying skeezebag, but being in a Trump tower doesn't mean anything

We have the date of the email. Maybe that was one of those days Trump was there. Start getting testimony from doormen, SS agents, housekeepers, etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Epstein was in Trump Tower AFTER the 2016 election.

Why would he be in Trump Tower if Trump had declared him persona non grata years earlier?

But this is not surprising. The only surprising thing is why Trump cares.

IT takes a dump on the WH narrative that Trump disassociated himself from Epstein in 2007, doesn't it?

I think Trump is a lying skeezebag, but being in a Trump tower doesn't mean anything

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Epstein was in Trump Tower AFTER the 2016 election.

Why would he be in Trump Tower if Trump had declared him persona non grata years earlier?

But this is not surprising. The only surprising thing is why Trump cares.

IT takes a dump on the WH narrative that Trump disassociated himself from Epstein in 2007, doesn't it?

I think Trump is a lying skeezebag, but being in a Trump tower doesn't mean anything

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Epstein was in Trump Tower AFTER the 2016 election.

Why would he be in Trump Tower if Trump had declared him persona non grata years earlier?

But this is not surprising. The only surprising thing is why Trump cares.

IT takes a dump on the WH narrative that Trump disassociated himself from Epstein in 2007, doesn't it?