Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/13/business/charlie-kirk-death-fired-comments?iid=cnn_buildContentRecirc_end_recirc&recs_exp=most-read-article-end&tenant_id=popular.en


CNN says there appears to be coordination:

Prominent far-right influencer Laura Loomer, a US senator, and a site called “Expose Charlie’s Murderers” have all drawn attention to people who have posted messages about Kirk’s Wednesday assassination.

The campaigns show how social media posts or personal messages — even by accounts with few followers or from people who are not public figures — could easily be surfaced and publicized, and people’s personal information can be spread across the internet at a time when doxxing is easier than ever.

The Charlie’s Murderers site, whose domain was registered anonymously and which says it is not a doxxing site, claims it has “received nearly 30,000 submissions,” according to a message on the site’s front page on midday Saturday. Currently, there are a few dozen submissions published on the site. “This website will soon be converted into a searchable database of all 30,000 submissions, filterable by general location and job industry. This is a permanent and continuously-updating archive of Radical activists calling for violence.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how some of these people coming out in the new today can be fired for saying "I didn't shed a tear." and "He spewed hate." Even if they were "celebratory," which I must be protected, they do not in any way incite violence.

How is this not an egregious violation of the First Amendment?

And, for the record, 1) I think all political violence is wrong and hurts us all and 2) I think it is in horrible taste to celebrate ANYONE's murder.

But how can these firings possibly stand in a court of law? This is insane.

All businesses have a code of conduct, and if you bring reputational harm to the company, they don’t have to keep you. Ditto with a person that does not share their values. I wouldn’t feel comfortable working with someone who celebrates the death of another person.

And private companies not have to abide by the first amendment, that is the government only.

So you're legitimizing the policing of speech under the "free speech" banner of Charlie Kirk and are saying people are no longer able to do their own thing on their own time with their own social media accounts. Everything you say or do is owned by someone else. It's not a good look for anyone who claims to be a champion of freedom.

I guess I can start policing the parking lit and scouring the social media of my employees and summarily firing MAGA folk. Sorry. Oh, and sorry you won't have health insurance or food since Trump cut those benefits.

On a positive note, yáll have bootstraps!

If your business is in DC, political affiliation is a protected class.

Are there a lot of MAGAs living in DC?

Good to know that people won’t be fired for their views on Kirk.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welcome to the police state. Congratulations, MAGA. You ruined what made the US great.

Not quite,


Just taking out the trash on the left cheering a murder.


Unacceptable.


I would expect the same treatment for the Right is someone like Ilhan Omar was assassinated. I don’t like her, but don’t like her, but I don’t want her dead. Anyone on the right who cheers for that should also be canceled.

Sorry to break the news but the right already failed to react in an “acceptable” manner to the Pelosi attacks and the Minnesota murders. Trump also is using security details as a political tool to punish his enemies by removing them. And let’s not get started about fomenting violence on j6 then pardoning the violence; as well as aggravating attacks on the federal judiciary (which has suffered assassinations and attempts).

If you can find ONE social media post showing a MAGA dancing, singing, and celebrating the deaths of the Minnesota murders, I’ll eat my hat.

What kind of hat will you be eating today.

Simple Google search:
Reports from June 2025 detail widespread outrage and condemnation of social media posts that mocked the assassination of Minnesota Democratic lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark. The posts, largely from conservative figures, spread misinformation and political jabs in the wake of the tragedy.

Senator Mike Lee (R-UT): The Senator deleted several inflammatory posts from his personal X account after facing blistering criticism.
The posts: He shared an image of the suspect, Vance Boelter, with the caption, "This is what happens when Marxists don't get their way". In a separate post, he wrote "Nightmare on Waltz Street," a misspelled jab at Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.

That is awful, but he didn’t laugh and celebrate their deaths.

I’ve seen so many TT and IG posts of people celebrating Kirk’s death that it makes me question democratic values and their humanity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/13/business/charlie-kirk-death-fired-comments?iid=cnn_buildContentRecirc_end_recirc&recs_exp=most-read-article-end&tenant_id=popular.en


CNN says there appears to be coordination:

Prominent far-right influencer Laura Loomer, a US senator, and a site called “Expose Charlie’s Murderers” have all drawn attention to people who have posted messages about Kirk’s Wednesday assassination.

The campaigns show how social media posts or personal messages — even by accounts with few followers or from people who are not public figures — could easily be surfaced and publicized, and people’s personal information can be spread across the internet at a time when doxxing is easier than ever.

The Charlie’s Murderers site, whose domain was registered anonymously and which says it is not a doxxing site, claims it has “received nearly 30,000 submissions,” according to a message on the site’s front page on midday Saturday. Currently, there are a few dozen submissions published on the site. “This website will soon be converted into a searchable database of all 30,000 submissions, filterable by general location and job industry. This is a permanent and continuously-updating archive of Radical activists calling for violence.”

For all you targeted by this website, defamation laws still apply. Feel free to subpoena the site, the ISP provider, and target the submitter and hold them liable for the full monetary damages associated with submitting any false/misleading info about you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s crazy to me is that Charlie Kirk claim to fame was all about free speech. And catching people for their own free speech seems pretty hypocritical to me.

You killed the man and his ideal of free speech and debate. Gloves are off now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how some of these people coming out in the new today can be fired for saying "I didn't shed a tear." and "He spewed hate." Even if they were "celebratory," which I must be protected, they do not in any way incite violence.

How is this not an egregious violation of the First Amendment?

And, for the record, 1) I think all political violence is wrong and hurts us all and 2) I think it is in horrible taste to celebrate ANYONE's murder.

But how can these firings possibly stand in a court of law? This is insane.

All businesses have a code of conduct, and if you bring reputational harm to the company, they don’t have to keep you. Ditto with a person that does not share their values. I wouldn’t feel comfortable working with someone who celebrates the death of another person.

And private companies not have to abide by the first amendment, that is the government only.

So you're legitimizing the policing of speech under the "free speech" banner of Charlie Kirk and are saying people are no longer able to do their own thing on their own time with their own social media accounts. Everything you say or do is owned by someone else. It's not a good look for anyone who claims to be a champion of freedom.

Have you never had a job, a real job, one with a contract and Human Resources department? You absolutely can be fired for conduct that happens on your own free time if the company deems it goes against their code of conduct and will bring reputational harm.

Some of the men who marched in Charlottesville back in 2017 were identified and fired from their jobs. This is the same thing.

Do you think that participating in a white supremacy rally is the same as being fired to doing things like posting a quote of someone’s exact words?

Sounds about white.

You are either very naive, ignorant, or have never worked for a private company, public school system, govt sector, etc. Good luck with saying whatever you want to post on a social media site.

No one said that. This is why everyone thinks that maga is so stupid. You’ve earned your reputation.

I'm not maga at all. I'm telling you that you can't post political feelings/beliefs if you have those types of jobs.

Tenured professors can't? What are "these types of jobs"?
Of course, if you have a Trump admin political appointment job, you can post whatever vicious lie you want.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how some of these people coming out in the new today can be fired for saying "I didn't shed a tear." and "He spewed hate." Even if they were "celebratory," which I must be protected, they do not in any way incite violence.

How is this not an egregious violation of the First Amendment?

And, for the record, 1) I think all political violence is wrong and hurts us all and 2) I think it is in horrible taste to celebrate ANYONE's murder.

But how can these firings possibly stand in a court of law? This is insane.

All businesses have a code of conduct, and if you bring reputational harm to the company, they don’t have to keep you. Ditto with a person that does not share their values. I wouldn’t feel comfortable working with someone who celebrates the death of another person.

And private companies not have to abide by the first amendment, that is the government only.

So you're legitimizing the policing of speech under the "free speech" banner of Charlie Kirk and are saying people are no longer able to do their own thing on their own time with their own social media accounts. Everything you say or do is owned by someone else. It's not a good look for anyone who claims to be a champion of freedom.

Have you never had a job, a real job, one with a contract and Human Resources department? You absolutely can be fired for conduct that happens on your own free time if the company deems it goes against their code of conduct and will bring reputational harm.

Some of the men who marched in Charlottesville back in 2017 were identified and fired from their jobs. This is the same thing.

Do you think that participating in a white supremacy rally is the same as being fired to doing things like posting a quote of someone’s exact words?

Sounds about white.

You are either very naive, ignorant, or have never worked for a private company, public school system, govt sector, etc. Good luck with saying whatever you want to post on a social media site.

No one said that. This is why everyone thinks that maga is so stupid. You’ve earned your reputation.

I'm not maga at all. I'm telling you that you can't post political feelings/beliefs if you have those types of jobs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/13/business/charlie-kirk-death-fired-comments?iid=cnn_buildContentRecirc_end_recirc&recs_exp=most-read-article-end&tenant_id=popular.en


CNN says there appears to be coordination:

Prominent far-right influencer Laura Loomer, a US senator, and a site called “Expose Charlie’s Murderers” have all drawn attention to people who have posted messages about Kirk’s Wednesday assassination.

The campaigns show how social media posts or personal messages — even by accounts with few followers or from people who are not public figures — could easily be surfaced and publicized, and people’s personal information can be spread across the internet at a time when doxxing is easier than ever.

The Charlie’s Murderers site, whose domain was registered anonymously and which says it is not a doxxing site, claims it has “received nearly 30,000 submissions,” according to a message on the site’s front page on midday Saturday. Currently, there are a few dozen submissions published on the site. “This website will soon be converted into a searchable database of all 30,000 submissions, filterable by general location and job industry. This is a permanent and continuously-updating archive of Radical activists calling for violence.”

For all you targeted by this website, defamation laws still apply. Feel free to subpoena the site, the ISP provider, and target the submitter and hold them liable for the full monetary damages associated with submitting any false/misleading info about you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welcome to the police state. Congratulations, MAGA. You ruined what made the US great.

What? What police state? If someone is dumb enough to publicly celebrate the assassination of an innocent person maybe they should be prepared to deal with the consequences. Employers have expectations of their employees. If they violate the terms of their employment, then consequences come their way.

Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/13/business/charlie-kirk-death-fired-comments?iid=cnn_buildContentRecirc_end_recirc&recs_exp=most-read-article-end&tenant_id=popular.en


CNN says there appears to be coordination:

Prominent far-right influencer Laura Loomer, a US senator, and a site called “Expose Charlie’s Murderers” have all drawn attention to people who have posted messages about Kirk’s Wednesday assassination.

The campaigns show how social media posts or personal messages — even by accounts with few followers or from people who are not public figures — could easily be surfaced and publicized, and people’s personal information can be spread across the internet at a time when doxxing is easier than ever.

The Charlie’s Murderers site, whose domain was registered anonymously and which says it is not a doxxing site, claims it has “received nearly 30,000 submissions,” according to a message on the site’s front page on midday Saturday. Currently, there are a few dozen submissions published on the site. “This website will soon be converted into a searchable database of all 30,000 submissions, filterable by general location and job industry. This is a permanent and continuously-updating archive of Radical activists calling for violence.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welcome to the police state. Congratulations, MAGA. You ruined what made the US great.

Not quite,


Just taking out the trash on the left cheering a murder.


Unacceptable.


I would expect the same treatment for the Right is someone like Ilhan Omar was assassinated. I don’t like her, but don’t like her, but I don’t want her dead. Anyone on the right who cheers for that should also be canceled.

No one is cheering his death. A lot of us just aren’t willing to forget the awful things he said and encouraged while he was alive. He didn’t deserve to die AND I’m not going to make him out to be some angel worthy of all these official courtesies just because he’s dead. It’s ABSURD that he’s been treated like a devoted public servant. Meanwhile, it was Kirk who thought a “patriot” should bail out Pelosi’s husband’s stacker and made a hero out of Rittenhouse.

You sound like you never leave the house and get exposed to a lot of propaganda.

You may not be cheering his death, but many college kids, teachers, other adults are all over social media cheering for his execution.

Just look it up.

Takes a second.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welcome to the police state. Congratulations, MAGA. You ruined what made the US great.

Not quite,


Just taking out the trash on the left cheering a murder.


Unacceptable.


I would expect the same treatment for the Right is someone like Ilhan Omar was assassinated. I don’t like her, but don’t like her, but I don’t want her dead. Anyone on the right who cheers for that should also be canceled.

No one is cheering his death. A lot of us just aren’t willing to forget the awful things he said and encouraged while he was alive. He didn’t deserve to die AND I’m not going to make him out to be some angel worthy of all these official courtesies just because he’s dead. It’s ABSURD that he’s been treated like a devoted public servant. Meanwhile, it was Kirk who thought a “patriot” should bail out Pelosi’s husband’s stacker and made a hero out of Rittenhouse.

You sound like you never leave the house and get exposed to a lot of propaganda.

You may not be cheering his death, but many college kids, teachers, other adults are all over social media cheering for his execution.

Just look it up.

Takes a second.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welcome to the police state. Congratulations, MAGA. You ruined what made the US great.

Not quite,


Just taking out the trash on the left cheering a murder.


Unacceptable.


I would expect the same treatment for the Right is someone like Ilhan Omar was assassinated. I don’t like her, but don’t like her, but I don’t want her dead. Anyone on the right who cheers for that should also be canceled.

Sorry to break the news but the right already failed to react in an “acceptable” manner to the Pelosi attacks and the Minnesota murders. Trump also is using security details as a political tool to punish his enemies by removing them. And let’s not get started about fomenting violence on j6 then pardoning the violence; as well as aggravating attacks on the federal judiciary (which has suffered assassinations and attempts).

If you can find ONE social media post showing a MAGA dancing, singing, and celebrating the deaths of the Minnesota murders, I’ll eat my hat.

What kind of hat will you be eating today.

Simple Google search:
Reports from June 2025 detail widespread outrage and condemnation of social media posts that mocked the assassination of Minnesota Democratic lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark. The posts, largely from conservative figures, spread misinformation and political jabs in the wake of the tragedy.

Senator Mike Lee (R-UT): The Senator deleted several inflammatory posts from his personal X account after facing blistering criticism.
The posts: He shared an image of the suspect, Vance Boelter, with the caption, "This is what happens when Marxists don't get their way". In a separate post, he wrote "Nightmare on Waltz Street," a misspelled jab at Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.

That is awful, but he didn’t laugh and celebrate their deaths.

I’ve seen so many TT and IG posts of people celebrating Kirk’s death that it makes me question democratic values and their humanity.

Don’t judge the world by social media experiences. It’s mostly fake and toxic. Read real news. Real real books. Get to know lots of different people. Travel.

Real people being authentic are mostly decent. Even if they disagree on politics.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Welcome to the police state. Congratulations, MAGA. You ruined what made the US great.

Not quite,


Just taking out the trash on the left cheering a murder.


Unacceptable.


I would expect the same treatment for the Right is someone like Ilhan Omar was assassinated. I don’t like her, but don’t like her, but I don’t want her dead. Anyone on the right who cheers for that should also be canceled.

Sorry to break the news but the right already failed to react in an “acceptable” manner to the Pelosi attacks and the Minnesota murders. Trump also is using security details as a political tool to punish his enemies by removing them. And let’s not get started about fomenting violence on j6 then pardoning the violence; as well as aggravating attacks on the federal judiciary (which has suffered assassinations and attempts).

If you can find ONE social media post showing a MAGA dancing, singing, and celebrating the deaths of the Minnesota murders, I’ll eat my hat.

What kind of hat will you be eating today.

Simple Google search:
Reports from June 2025 detail widespread outrage and condemnation of social media posts that mocked the assassination of Minnesota Democratic lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark. The posts, largely from conservative figures, spread misinformation and political jabs in the wake of the tragedy.

Senator Mike Lee (R-UT): The Senator deleted several inflammatory posts from his personal X account after facing blistering criticism.
The posts: He shared an image of the suspect, Vance Boelter, with the caption, "This is what happens when Marxists don't get their way". In a separate post, he wrote "Nightmare on Waltz Street," a misspelled jab at Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.

That is awful, but he didn’t laugh and celebrate their deaths.

I’ve seen so many TT and IG posts of people celebrating Kirk’s death that it makes me question democratic values and their humanity.