Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter if he is pro or anti-Trump. It doesn't matter what his sexual orientation or identity is. None of that matters.
If he didn't have access to guns, he couldn't have killed to innocent children. He couldn't have shot over a dozen others.
Anyone who does not see this, is complicit.
Mentality deranged people should not have access to guns. The signs were there
No citizen should. Period. People are fine before they have mental breakdowns. Our mental health care sucks. All our health care sucks. Even if it didn't, why should anyone have access to automatic weapons?? It doesn't matter what a person's politics are. I am so sick of this. Those poor children.
Then we have to agree to disagree. The vast majority of people can be trusted with guns.
Who has the responsibility to determine that? What if this guy presented as completely normal and trustworthy? What if someone is as stable as can be and then has a psychotic episode? What if someone is a charming in-control sociopath who can fool anyone, including a salesman looking to earn his wages in the Walmart gun department? What do you say then? "Oooops! Sorry, kids are dead. Walmart guy's bad." You are part of the problem if you voted for this. The blood is on your hands.
Read up on this guy. There were many, many warnings. A lot of news is coming out now.
Exactly. Red flags are ALWAYS there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
He killed himself with a self-inflicted gunshot, ONLY when the cops showed up with their guns.
If ONLY some trained person had been on site with a weapon to IMMEDIATELY shoot back at him, rather than having to wait for law enforcement.
Real life is not like a movie. Most people are going to hesitate, get nervous, or panic in these situations. That is not a reliable option.
Liar. Trained and experienced armed people are essential.
And trained and experienced armed people aren’t that hard to find. They just need to be allowed to be armed in these places. Most of the time, it’s not permitted. And since they’re not criminals and follow rules, they’re unarmed, despite being the type of people who could be relied on to stop stuff like this before the police can get there.
Exactly. Democrat politicians are allowing these tragedies unnecessarily.
Yet armed schools in FLA get shot up and nobody stops the shooters. Schools with armed guards have more shootings. So, no.
Wrong again. Read “Why Meadow Died” if you really want to know the facts.
Anonymous wrote:What did his letter say? What was the motive? Was he on drugs for mental health and went crazy as a side effect?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Children are dead. Children are injured. Children are traumatized. I don't give a flying @$#% if the shooter was a man, woman, liberal, MAGA, conservative, etc. IT DOESN'T MATTER. This country has a gun problem. All the arguing about the shooter is stupid and pointless. More kids are dead because this country cares more about guns than it does children. FFS.
The fact that you don’t care about anything else says you’re mentally unstable and incapable of having an actual conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
He killed himself with a self-inflicted gunshot, ONLY when the cops showed up with their guns.
If ONLY some trained person had been on site with a weapon to IMMEDIATELY shoot back at him, rather than having to wait for law enforcement.
Real life is not like a movie. Most people are going to hesitate, get nervous, or panic in these situations. That is not a reliable option.
Liar. Trained and experienced armed people are essential.
And trained and experienced armed people aren’t that hard to find. They just need to be allowed to be armed in these places. Most of the time, it’s not permitted. And since they’re not criminals and follow rules, they’re unarmed, despite being the type of people who could be relied on to stop stuff like this before the police can get there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regardless of when and what details come out I’m confident gun control wouldn’t have stopped it.
If he had not had a gun, he literally could not have shot all of these people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
He killed himself with a self-inflicted gunshot, ONLY when the cops showed up with their guns.
If ONLY some trained person had been on site with a weapon to IMMEDIATELY shoot back at him, rather than having to wait for law enforcement.
Real life is not like a movie. Most people are going to hesitate, get nervous, or panic in these situations. That is not a reliable option.
Liar. Trained and experienced armed people are essential.
And trained and experienced armed people aren’t that hard to find. They just need to be allowed to be armed in these places. Most of the time, it’s not permitted. And since they’re not criminals and follow rules, they’re unarmed, despite being the type of people who could be relied on to stop stuff like this before the police can get there.
Exactly. Democrat politicians are allowing these tragedies unnecessarily.
Yet armed schools in FLA get shot up and nobody stops the shooters. Schools with armed guards have more shootings. So, no.
Anonymous wrote:Did school mistreated his mother because of him being trans?
Anonymous wrote:Did school mistreated his mother because of him being trans?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What was his beef with the kids at the church? Was he abused there and in his twisted mind, wanted to save other kids from similar experience?
Could be. Could also just be familiarity? His mother worked there (at the school), and retired in 2021 I believe.
I wondered if perhaps the church or school had wronged him or his mother in same way (perhaps discriminating against them?) but there is absolutely no evidence of that, and it is not mentioned in his letter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What was his beef with the kids at the church? Was he abused there and in his twisted mind, wanted to save other kids from similar experience?
Could be. Could also just be familiarity? His mother worked there (at the school), and retired in 2021 I believe.
I wondered if perhaps the church or school had wronged him or his mother in same way (perhaps discriminating against them?) but there is absolutely no evidence of that, and it is not mentioned in his letter.
Anonymous wrote:It is abundantly clear we need to ban firearms, end of story.
Anonymous wrote:What was his beef with the kids at the church? Was he abused there and in his twisted mind, wanted to save other kids from similar experience?