Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LEOs of all kinds take steps to avoid making their identities public. My DH is a LEO with a federal agency known for apprehending dangerous individuals. Obviously he doesn't want his face out there. Dangerous people have dangerous friends and associates who have no qualms about harming a cop or his family.

The premise of your defense is BS. People working construction sites, picking produce, bussing tables are not dangerous people.

“ICE” is abducting brown people without cause. That’s not law enforcement and it’s unconstitutional.

+1000%. Even ICE's own data reveals that only 2.5% of the people they are arresting and detaining have any kind of prior criminal record whatsoever. That's substantially lower than the general US population.

IF they were trying to capture MS-13 members that would be a credible argument and with those kinds of people they should take extra precautions. But again, per ICE's own data, 97.5% of the people they are going after have NO gang affiliation or criminal record or anything whatsoever. MOST of the people being arrested and detained are NOT "dangerous people with dangerous friends and associates."

The bolded is flat out false. No matter how many times you say it, it’s still false.

I’ll note that you NEVER provide evidence of this claim when you state it. I think we all know why.

It is absolutely true though no matter how many times you say otherwise.

I notice you didn't provide anything to prove that statement false.

I think we know why.
NP

The onus is on you to provide sources.

You have no proof really.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LEOs of all kinds take steps to avoid making their identities public. My DH is a LEO with a federal agency known for apprehending dangerous individuals. Obviously he doesn't want his face out there. Dangerous people have dangerous friends and associates who have no qualms about harming a cop or his family.

The premise of your defense is BS. People working construction sites, picking produce, bussing tables are not dangerous people.

“ICE” is abducting brown people without cause. That’s not law enforcement and it’s unconstitutional.

+1000%. Even ICE's own data reveals that only 2.5% of the people they are arresting and detaining have any kind of prior criminal record whatsoever. That's substantially lower than the general US population.

IF they were trying to capture MS-13 members that would be a credible argument and with those kinds of people they should take extra precautions. But again, per ICE's own data, 97.5% of the people they are going after have NO gang affiliation or criminal record or anything whatsoever. MOST of the people being arrested and detained are NOT "dangerous people with dangerous friends and associates."

The bolded is flat out false. No matter how many times you say it, it’s still false.

I’ll note that you NEVER provide evidence of this claim when you state it. I think we all know why.

It is absolutely true though no matter how many times you say otherwise.

I notice you didn't provide anything to prove that statement false.

I think we know why.
NP

The onus is on you to provide sources.

Anonymous wrote:

Too bad tbe whole Trump regime cannot be counted on to tell the truth.

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]LEOs of all kinds take steps to avoid making their identities public. My DH is a LEO with a federal agency known for apprehending dangerous individuals. Obviously he doesn't want his face out there. Dangerous people have dangerous friends and associates who have no qualms about harming a cop or his family. [/quote]

The premise of your defense is BS. People working construction sites, picking produce, bussing tables are not dangerous people.

“ICE” is abducting brown people without cause. That’s not law enforcement and it’s unconstitutional. [/quote]

+1000%. Even ICE's own data reveals that only 2.5% of the people they are arresting and detaining have any kind of prior criminal record whatsoever. That's substantially lower than the general US population.

IF they were trying to capture MS-13 members that would be a credible argument and with those kinds of people they should take extra precautions. B[b]ut again, per ICE's own data, 97.5% of the people they are going after have NO gang affiliation or criminal record or anything [/b]whatsoever. MOST of the people being arrested and detained are NOT "dangerous people with dangerous friends and associates."[/quote]


The bolded is flat out false. No matter how many times you say it, it’s still false.

I’ll note that you NEVER provide evidence of this claim when you state it. I think we all know why. [/quote]

It is absolutely true though no matter how many times you say otherwise.

I notice you didn't provide anything to prove that statement false.

I think we know why.
NP[/quote]

I sure as hell did. Up thread. Here it is again. THIS is ICE’s statement.
Now where is your proof?

[twitter] https://x.com/icegov/status/1935521163767333283?s=46&t=R0sFrGNc8GH_7llJGM-81g[/twitter][/quote]

[twitter]https://x.com/icegov/status/1935521163767333283?s=46&t=R0sFrGNc8GH_7llJGM-81g[/twitter]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]LEOs of all kinds take steps to avoid making their identities public. My DH is a LEO with a federal agency known for apprehending dangerous individuals. Obviously he doesn't want his face out there. Dangerous people have dangerous friends and associates who have no qualms about harming a cop or his family. [/quote]

The premise of your defense is BS. People working construction sites, picking produce, bussing tables are not dangerous people.

“ICE” is abducting brown people without cause. That’s not law enforcement and it’s unconstitutional. [/quote]

+1000%. Even ICE's own data reveals that only 2.5% of the people they are arresting and detaining have any kind of prior criminal record whatsoever. That's substantially lower than the general US population.

IF they were trying to capture MS-13 members that would be a credible argument and with those kinds of people they should take extra precautions. B[b]ut again, per ICE's own data, 97.5% of the people they are going after have NO gang affiliation or criminal record or anything [/b]whatsoever. MOST of the people being arrested and detained are NOT "dangerous people with dangerous friends and associates."[/quote]


The bolded is flat out false. No matter how many times you say it, it’s still false.

I’ll note that you NEVER provide evidence of this claim when you state it. I think we all know why. [/quote]

It is absolutely true though no matter how many times you say otherwise.

I notice you didn't provide anything to prove that statement false.

I think we know why.
NP[/quote]

I sure as hell did. Up thread. Here it is again. THIS is ICE’s statement.
Now where is your proof?

[twitter] https://x.com/icegov/status/1935521163767333283?s=46&t=R0sFrGNc8GH_7llJGM-81g[/twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ICE impersonation on the rise.

This whole secret police thing is going to get real agents killed.

Oh well.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/04/us/ice-impersonators-on-the-rise-arrests-made-as-authorities-issue-national-warning

Idiots have impersonated law enforcement for decades. That you’re just catching on to it now doesn’t make it more prevalent.

You are in denial. It’s understandable.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2024/04/26/3-ways-cults-bait-and-trap-common-people-according-to-a-psychologist/

Here’s a famous instance of people pretending to be police officers. Maybe you’ve heard of it.

https://www.gardnermuseum.org/about/theft-story

These are thefts. Sure they have always been around

Crazies who target random people want power

Oh and do you think they would have been let in if they were masked?

You are sooo cute with your dumb post

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ICE impersonation on the rise.

This whole secret police thing is going to get real agents killed.

Oh well.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/04/us/ice-impersonators-on-the-rise-arrests-made-as-authorities-issue-national-warning

Idiots have impersonated law enforcement for decades. That you’re just catching on to it now doesn’t make it more prevalent.

You are in denial. It’s understandable.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2024/04/26/3-ways-cults-bait-and-trap-common-people-according-to-a-psychologist/

Here’s a famous instance of people pretending to be police officers. Maybe you’ve heard of it.

https://www.gardnermuseum.org/about/theft-story

These are thefts. Sure they have always been around

Crazies who target random people want power

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ICE impersonation on the rise.

This whole secret police thing is going to get real agents killed.

Oh well.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/04/us/ice-impersonators-on-the-rise-arrests-made-as-authorities-issue-national-warning

Idiots have impersonated law enforcement for decades. That you’re just catching on to it now doesn’t make it more prevalent.

You are in denial. It’s understandable.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2024/04/26/3-ways-cults-bait-and-trap-common-people-according-to-a-psychologist/

Here’s a famous instance of people pretending to be police officers. Maybe you’ve heard of it.

https://www.gardnermuseum.org/about/theft-story

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ICE impersonation on the rise.

This whole secret police thing is going to get real agents killed.

Oh well.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/04/us/ice-impersonators-on-the-rise-arrests-made-as-authorities-issue-national-warning

What’s going to get agents killed is left wing people doxxing them so some lunatic can take them out.

Why do you hate accountability? Is it because having a secret police allows them to do whatever they want without having to answer to their employers, the American people?

Someone did all this about 80 years ago and we solved that problem. We will solve it again.

Why are you so desperate to have people who are simply doing their jobs doxxed? Do you think this is the way the left will get rid of ICE? We know they want to defund them. Is this method even more effective in your mind?

History has taught those who listen that this is not adequate for democracy.

Some jobs demand anonymity. But those jobs should be ones which interact with mothers and children, high school students, those legally seeking asylum, etc.

And definitely shouldn't be allowed for any organization run by Miller

He hates democracy

Too bad. You don’t see the rules thankfully.

His job is not a permanency. Yet

Too bad for you

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LEOs of all kinds take steps to avoid making their identities public. My DH is a LEO with a federal agency known for apprehending dangerous individuals. Obviously he doesn't want his face out there. Dangerous people have dangerous friends and associates who have no qualms about harming a cop or his family.

The premise of your defense is BS. People working construction sites, picking produce, bussing tables are not dangerous people.

“ICE” is abducting brown people without cause. That’s not law enforcement and it’s unconstitutional.

+1000%. Even ICE's own data reveals that only 2.5% of the people they are arresting and detaining have any kind of prior criminal record whatsoever. That's substantially lower than the general US population.

IF they were trying to capture MS-13 members that would be a credible argument and with those kinds of people they should take extra precautions. But again, per ICE's own data, 97.5% of the people they are going after have NO gang affiliation or criminal record or anything whatsoever. MOST of the people being arrested and detained are NOT "dangerous people with dangerous friends and associates."

The bolded is flat out false. No matter how many times you say it, it’s still false.

I’ll note that you NEVER provide evidence of this claim when you state it. I think we all know why.

It is absolutely true though no matter how many times you say otherwise.

I notice you didn't provide anything to prove that statement false.

I think we know why.
NP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ICE impersonation on the rise.

This whole secret police thing is going to get real agents killed.

Oh well.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/04/us/ice-impersonators-on-the-rise-arrests-made-as-authorities-issue-national-warning

What’s going to get agents killed is left wing people doxxing them so some lunatic can take them out.

Why do you hate accountability? Is it because having a secret police allows them to do whatever they want without having to answer to their employers, the American people?

Someone did all this about 80 years ago and we solved that problem. We will solve it again.

Why are you so desperate to have people who are simply doing their jobs doxxed? Do you think this is the way the left will get rid of ICE? We know they want to defund them. Is this method even more effective in your mind?

History has taught those who listen that this is not adequate for democracy.

Some jobs demand anonymity. But those jobs should be ones which interact with mothers and children, high school students, those legally seeking asylum, etc.

And definitely shouldn't be allowed for any organization run by Miller

He hates democracy

Too bad. You don’t see the rules thankfully.

*set.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ICE impersonation on the rise.

This whole secret police thing is going to get real agents killed.

Oh well.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/04/us/ice-impersonators-on-the-rise-arrests-made-as-authorities-issue-national-warning

What’s going to get agents killed is left wing people doxxing them so some lunatic can take them out.

Why do you hate accountability? Is it because having a secret police allows them to do whatever they want without having to answer to their employers, the American people?

Someone did all this about 80 years ago and we solved that problem. We will solve it again.

Why are you so desperate to have people who are simply doing their jobs doxxed? Do you think this is the way the left will get rid of ICE? We know they want to defund them. Is this method even more effective in your mind?

History has taught those who listen that this is not adequate for democracy.

Some jobs demand anonymity. But those jobs should be ones which interact with mothers and children, high school students, those legally seeking asylum, etc.

And definitely shouldn't be allowed for any organization run by Miller

He hates democracy

Too bad. You don’t see the rules thankfully.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LEOs of all kinds take steps to avoid making their identities public. My DH is a LEO with a federal agency known for apprehending dangerous individuals. Obviously he doesn't want his face out there. Dangerous people have dangerous friends and associates who have no qualms about harming a cop or his family.

The premise of your defense is BS. People working construction sites, picking produce, bussing tables are not dangerous people.

“ICE” is abducting brown people without cause. That’s not law enforcement and it’s unconstitutional.

+1000%. Even ICE's own data reveals that only 2.5% of the people they are arresting and detaining have any kind of prior criminal record whatsoever. That's substantially lower than the general US population.

IF they were trying to capture MS-13 members that would be a credible argument and with those kinds of people they should take extra precautions. But again, per ICE's own data, 97.5% of the people they are going after have NO gang affiliation or criminal record or anything whatsoever. MOST of the people being arrested and detained are NOT "dangerous people with dangerous friends and associates."

The bolded is flat out false. No matter how many times you say it, it’s still false.

I’ll note that you NEVER provide evidence of this claim when you state it. I think we all know why.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ICE impersonation on the rise.

This whole secret police thing is going to get real agents killed.

Oh well.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/04/us/ice-impersonators-on-the-rise-arrests-made-as-authorities-issue-national-warning

What’s going to get agents killed is left wing people doxxing them so some lunatic can take them out.

Why do you hate accountability? Is it because having a secret police allows them to do whatever they want without having to answer to their employers, the American people?

Someone did all this about 80 years ago and we solved that problem. We will solve it again.

Why are you so desperate to have people who are simply doing their jobs doxxed? Do you think this is the way the left will get rid of ICE? We know they want to defund them. Is this method even more effective in your mind?

History has taught those who listen that this is not adequate for democracy.

Some jobs demand anonymity. But those jobs should be ones which interact with mothers and children, high school students, those legally seeking asylum, etc.

And definitely shouldn't be allowed for any organization run by Miller

He hates democracy