Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ATS is title 1 now???????
I found this thread today and I saw no evidence that ATS is now Title I.
As an ATS family, I don't think that would dissuade us or most of our cohort from attending. It's a diverse school (we're a mixed race family) where my kids have friends of varying backgrounds they wouldn't have met at our S Arlington school (they'd be grouped into the 2E Gifted school w/in school group, which is mostly wealthy white kids). If APS wants to make ATs Title I and add it to the CEP group, so much the better. Smaller classes AND free breakfast/lunch? Awesome.
Don’t forget you also get to pick 10 free books mailed to you every year.
Anonymous wrote:Ats going downhill yikes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. People are gloating that title 1 status will ruin ATS but also mad that fleet and innovation won’t suffer the same fate.
It's not a punishment to apply for Title 1 status when the threshold is met. It feels unfair if (IF, bc we don't know) some schools that qualify are getting the extra resources, while other similarly situated schools are not. Make sense?
This.
And then we need to ask WHY they are applying for ATS and not the others? Very unfair.
So ask.
Plan to. Thanks, sweetie.
Did anyone find out if Fleet or Innovation are applying for Title 1 status and will have more teachers next year? I didn't see job postings to indicate a change, if so.
APS only cares about poverty when it affects ATS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ATS parent. Some of you don't know anything about ATS and it shows.
I've never met a really wealthy parent at ATS. There are alot of immigrants families. Asian, South Asian, Hispanic, Middle Eastern, African. White families are in the minority.
ATS has two bilingual family specialists. The one who's been there the longest speaks Spanish.
PP is right about the immigrant families taking school very seriously. Almost the entire school turns out for school events. Low-income families are very involved.
Admin expects parent involvement and and does not coddle parents.
This is not true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ATS is successful because of the immigrant families there. They want homework and good behavior. They show up to school on the first day with flowers for the teachers and dress to the nines for every event. They expect their kids to be successful.
Which immigrants
Ethiopian, Eritrean, Mongolian, Bolivian, El Salvadoran...
Actually, that’s not quite correct. ATS is unique for Arlington in that it has a very small (~10%) contingent of Hispanic students (made up from many different countries, not just one or two), and 30% Asian population. That’s the largest percentage Asian of any school in Arlington, as far as I know.
And yes, all are very motivated, across all ethnic backgrounds.
Doesn’t sound like they need title I dollars.
So motivated and poor = not deserving of support and dollars??
Only unmotivated should get dollars?
Seems like APS is making the determination that only the motivated AND poor get additional funds. Unmotivated and poor? We don’t need to apply.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm conflicted: I'm very wealthy and my kid made the K lottery for this year and I love that ATS is so in demand and held in high esteem and I can sort of brag we made it but
On the other hand, since they are now title 1, I'm terrified my child will be in the same school and classroom as poor brown children.
The poor brown children's moms make amazing food and you get to try it once a year. There is no way that ATS will decline its waitlist and yes, we can pin it to 2030. I'll still be wasting time on this hell site.
Anonymous wrote:Idk why you all care about ATS. It’s not like their students perform better in middle and high school. It’s the best slice of government cheese… but it’s still government cheese.
Anonymous wrote:Never change Arlington. 8 pages of liberals angry that a successful school serving low income immigrants, enough to be Title 1, will get more federal money to serve low income immigrants.
Anonymous wrote:I'm conflicted: I'm very wealthy and my kid made the K lottery for this year and I love that ATS is so in demand and held in high esteem and I can sort of brag we made it but
On the other hand, since they are now title 1, I'm terrified my child will be in the same school and classroom as poor brown children.
Anonymous wrote:ATS is successful because of the immigrant families there. They want homework and good behavior. They show up to school on the first day with flowers for the teachers and dress to the nines for every event. They expect their kids to be successful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Title 1 status will deter some families from applying. The families who choose between private schools and ATS. So the school will become more and more low income. Wait and see.
That hasn’t happened at Campbell and they are a title I option school.
Campbell doesn’t have the same waitlist as ATS. Campbell draws a lot of kids from other Title 1 schools.
So does ATS. Look at the transfer report.
People choose ATS because they have high achievement with a really diverse student population.
ATS pulls the low AND higher income kids from those schools. The same is not true for Campbell.
Got it. So you think ATS will
Decline because affluent parents will not sent their kids to ATS if it’s a title I school. And achievement will
Decline because poor kids can’t learn.
You don’t think achievement is tied to SES? Then why do people complain that many of our SA schools are majority low income while NA schools are wealthy? I mean, if it doesn’t matter…
Of course it is. ATS has minimized achievement gaps for years. Title I gives them more resources to serve their students. A family in an expensive house in green valley will not be turned off by it being a title I school. It just proves what ATS families have know for years.
You are naive if you don’t think Title 1 status will turn some families away.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Title 1 status will deter some families from applying. The families who choose between private schools and ATS. So the school will become more and more low income. Wait and see.
That hasn’t happened at Campbell and they are a title I option school.
Campbell doesn’t have the same waitlist as ATS. Campbell draws a lot of kids from other Title 1 schools.
So does ATS. Look at the transfer report.
People choose ATS because they have high achievement with a really diverse student population.
ATS pulls the low AND higher income kids from those schools. The same is not true for Campbell.
Got it. So you think ATS will
Decline because affluent parents will not sent their kids to ATS if it’s a title I school. And achievement will
Decline because poor kids can’t learn.
You don’t think achievement is tied to SES? Then why do people complain that many of our SA schools are majority low income while NA schools are wealthy? I mean, if it doesn’t matter…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, this is a good thing for ATS and APS. They’re hiring 3 new teachers with more Title I funding.
But why not apply for other schools? Why wait until 50% when they’re eligible at 40%?
Because neighborhood schools on cusp can easily tip the other way.
OR they know many of the higher income families in the neighborhood won’t send their kids to a Title 1 school, making it even more low-performing.
+1 ATS won’t have that problem.
They will if performance starts to decline. And this application for Title 1 makes it seem like things are heading in that direction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Haters gonna hate. ATS is a great school. Title I status means it will get a few more resources to do even more for its students.
It seems odd that a school who's population changes year to year could be a Title 1 designated school. Couldn't they lose it the next year?
ATS is only becoming more low income, not the other way around.
A percentage of seats are reserved for VPI students
How can you possibly state that as fact when the lottery is blind?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two neighborhood schools losing their title I funds.
https://www.arlnow.com/2025/06/20/two-aps-schools-lose-title-i-designations-while-another-joins-the-list/
As a former abingdon parent that is not good, the schools is massive and needs all the help it can get.
How can a CEP school drop out of Title I in one school year? And why does Hoffman Boston get kicked off (43.02% Free and Reduced Meals) while ATS gets more support? (35.26% FARM)
https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/sites/57/2025/03/FreeReduced-20242025.pdf
ATS is going downhill and they need more resources to fix it. Letting it fail would be too embarrassing.
How is it going downhill? Low on the waitlist so more info is helpful.