Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.
He wouldn't qualify to come back to the US as phoney asylum was removed from countries like El Salvador which have the safest crime rates after the crack down on gangs. The idea someone should get asylum because of local crime is wild.
The idea that you can avoid due process by sneaking someone over the border is wild.
Constitution rights can be annoying. That doesn't mean you get to skip the ones you don't like, though.
As a Citizen of El Salvador, what rights does he have under the US Constitution? What rights do YOU have in El Salvador under their constitution?
Non-citizens have rights under our US Constitution. The Supreme Court has ruled on this many, many times.
https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/constitutional-rights-noncitizens/
Should a noncitizen be charged with a crime, he has exactly the same Fifth and Sixth Amendment procedural rights as a citizen, including the right to a jury trial, the right to counsel, and protection against self-incrimination. If convicted, the Eighth Amendment prevents the government from subjecting aliens to “cruel and unusual punishment” in exactly the same ways as it does with citizens.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-constitutional-rights-do-undocumented-immigrants-have <- this one is good in that it reminds us all that the US Constitution states "people" and "persons" when describing rights, it does not say "US citizens".
Correct, IF they are currently on US soil, which he is not
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.
He wouldn't qualify to come back to the US as phoney asylum was removed from countries like El Salvador which have the safest crime rates after the crack down on gangs. The idea someone should get asylum because of local crime is wild.
The idea that you can avoid due process by sneaking someone over the border is wild.
Constitution rights can be annoying. That doesn't mean you get to skip the ones you don't like, though.
As a Citizen of El Salvador, what rights does he have under the US Constitution? What rights do YOU have in El Salvador under their constitution?
The Supreme Court said 9-0 to get him back here and give him due process.
9-0
If the Supreme Court of El Salvador ruled 9-0 to send a US Citizen to El Salvador, what power does that hold?
Here's a question for you then? What should the remedy be if your daughter gets swept up and without being afforded due process is shipped off? What if some thug police departmentment just crashes into your house without a warrant and beats you until you confess to a crime you had nothing to do with and ships you off?
As a US citizen, we would have rights under the US Constitution. As a Non Citizen not in the USA we would have rights under our government, as he does. At this point a citizen of El Salvador is in prison in El Salvador without being charged with a crime (as far as we know), the Government of El Salvador is holding him hostage, your anger should be towards them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.
He wouldn't qualify to come back to the US as phoney asylum was removed from countries like El Salvador which have the safest crime rates after the crack down on gangs. The idea someone should get asylum because of local crime is wild.
The idea that you can avoid due process by sneaking someone over the border is wild.
Constitution rights can be annoying. That doesn't mean you get to skip the ones you don't like, though.
As a Citizen of El Salvador, what rights does he have under the US Constitution? What rights do YOU have in El Salvador under their constitution?
The Supreme Court said 9-0 to get him back here and give him due process.
9-0
If the Supreme Court of El Salvador ruled 9-0 to send a US Citizen to El Salvador, what power does that hold?
Here's a question for you then? What should the remedy be if your daughter gets swept up and without being afforded due process is shipped off? What if some thug police departmentment just crashes into your house without a warrant and beats you until you confess to a crime you had nothing to do with and ships you off?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.
He wouldn't qualify to come back to the US as phoney asylum was removed from countries like El Salvador which have the safest crime rates after the crack down on gangs. The idea someone should get asylum because of local crime is wild.
The idea that you can avoid due process by sneaking someone over the border is wild.
Constitution rights can be annoying. That doesn't mean you get to skip the ones you don't like, though.
As a Citizen of El Salvador, what rights does he have under the US Constitution? What rights do YOU have in El Salvador under their constitution?
Non-citizens have rights under our US Constitution. The Supreme Court has ruled on this many, many times.
https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/constitutional-rights-noncitizens/
Should a noncitizen be charged with a crime, he has exactly the same Fifth and Sixth Amendment procedural rights as a citizen, including the right to a jury trial, the right to counsel, and protection against self-incrimination. If convicted, the Eighth Amendment prevents the government from subjecting aliens to “cruel and unusual punishment” in exactly the same ways as it does with citizens.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-constitutional-rights-do-undocumented-immigrants-have <- this one is good in that it reminds us all that the US Constitution states "people" and "persons" when describing rights, it does not say "US citizens".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.
He wouldn't qualify to come back to the US as phoney asylum was removed from countries like El Salvador which have the safest crime rates after the crack down on gangs. The idea someone should get asylum because of local crime is wild.
The idea that you can avoid due process by sneaking someone over the border is wild.
Constitution rights can be annoying. That doesn't mean you get to skip the ones you don't like, though.
As a Citizen of El Salvador, what rights does he have under the US Constitution? What rights do YOU have in El Salvador under their constitution?
Should a noncitizen be charged with a crime, he has exactly the same Fifth and Sixth Amendment procedural rights as a citizen, including the right to a jury trial, the right to counsel, and protection against self-incrimination. If convicted, the Eighth Amendment prevents the government from subjecting aliens to “cruel and unusual punishment” in exactly the same ways as it does with citizens.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.
He wouldn't qualify to come back to the US as phoney asylum was removed from countries like El Salvador which have the safest crime rates after the crack down on gangs. The idea someone should get asylum because of local crime is wild.
The idea that you can avoid due process by sneaking someone over the border is wild.
Constitution rights can be annoying. That doesn't mean you get to skip the ones you don't like, though.
As a Citizen of El Salvador, what rights does he have under the US Constitution? What rights do YOU have in El Salvador under their constitution?
The Supreme Court said 9-0 to get him back here and give him due process.
9-0
If the Supreme Court of El Salvador ruled 9-0 to send a US Citizen to El Salvador, what power does that hold?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.
He wouldn't qualify to come back to the US as phoney asylum was removed from countries like El Salvador which have the safest crime rates after the crack down on gangs. The idea someone should get asylum because of local crime is wild.
The idea that you can avoid due process by sneaking someone over the border is wild.
Constitution rights can be annoying. That doesn't mean you get to skip the ones you don't like, though.
As a Citizen of El Salvador, what rights does he have under the US Constitution? What rights do YOU have in El Salvador under their constitution?
The Supreme Court said 9-0 to get him back here and give him due process.
9-0
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.
He wouldn't qualify to come back to the US as phoney asylum was removed from countries like El Salvador which have the safest crime rates after the crack down on gangs. The idea someone should get asylum because of local crime is wild.
The idea that you can avoid due process by sneaking someone over the border is wild.
Constitution rights can be annoying. That doesn't mean you get to skip the ones you don't like, though.
As a Citizen of El Salvador, what rights does he have under the US Constitution? What rights do YOU have in El Salvador under their constitution?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.
He wouldn't qualify to come back to the US as phoney asylum was removed from countries like El Salvador which have the safest crime rates after the crack down on gangs. The idea someone should get asylum because of local crime is wild.
The idea that you can avoid due process by sneaking someone over the border is wild.
Constitution rights can be annoying. That doesn't mean you get to skip the ones you don't like, though.
As a Citizen of El Salvador, what rights does he have under the US Constitution? What rights do YOU have in El Salvador under their constitution?
Why do you keep asking the same dumb question?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.
He wouldn't qualify to come back to the US as phoney asylum was removed from countries like El Salvador which have the safest crime rates after the crack down on gangs. The idea someone should get asylum because of local crime is wild.
The idea that you can avoid due process by sneaking someone over the border is wild.
Constitution rights can be annoying. That doesn't mean you get to skip the ones you don't like, though.
As a Citizen of El Salvador, what rights does he have under the US Constitution? What rights do YOU have in El Salvador under their constitution?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.
He wouldn't qualify to come back to the US as phoney asylum was removed from countries like El Salvador which have the safest crime rates after the crack down on gangs. The idea someone should get asylum because of local crime is wild.
The idea that you can avoid due process by sneaking someone over the border is wild.
Constitution rights can be annoying. That doesn't mean you get to skip the ones you don't like, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.
He wouldn't qualify to come back to the US as phoney asylum was removed from countries like El Salvador which have the safest crime rates after the crack down on gangs. The idea someone should get asylum because of local crime is wild.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home
No, cutie, he isn't.
DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.
I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.
I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.
Stop parroting bullshit.
It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.
Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any
He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.