Anonymous wrote:I don’t know.

Yes, Trump got a wake up call he cannot bring peace to Ukraine.

Really, this war is great for the west. Russian birth rate is bottoming out; they are killing thousands of their males a month; they have a war based economy which is never good for any country.

I could totally see Trump flipping a switch and being like, sure - give Ukraine 300 F35s….we have the F47 and don’t need them. Throw in 500 m1a1 and 1m artillery rounds.

And do it next week.

That seems more realistic than peace in the next year.

I love when you guys put your delusions on the record. Like there are even 300 F35s that can fly...

I don’t know.

Yes, Trump got a wake up call he cannot bring peace to Ukraine.

Really, this war is great for the west. Russian birth rate is bottoming out; they are killing thousands of their males a month; they have a war based economy which is never good for any country.

I could totally see Trump flipping a switch and being like, sure - give Ukraine 300 F35s….we have the F47 and don’t need them. Throw in 500 m1a1 and 1m artillery rounds.

And do it next week.

That seems more realistic than peace in the next year.

Trump just lost BIGLY in his negotiations with Putin.

The man is a failure

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol Putin just launched one of the biggest drone attacks targeting civilians the day before he is going to meet with Trump.

Trump is so weak.

Yes. Being a Putin fan boy looks pathetic. But I think Trump is starting to realize that. The positive energy is with Macron and the new Pope, who will be meeting with Zelensky in the next couple of days. Europe is being pretty solid with its support of Ukraine and moving on from its dependency on the US. There's a lot going on. And Republicans are completely on the wrong side of things. Trump isn't an idiot politically. And so far, he's allowed the Biden era weapons support to continue - with the exception of Kursk, when he and Musk blinded Ukraine. But that put the US in a weak position ultimately and no one trusts the US anymore. That was very costly for the US when they actively helped Russia. That didn't go well for Trump. And Putin obviously has no interest in peace. I think Trump is starting to develop some personal enmity with Putin - like with Netanyahu. Which is good.

Trump is suddenly finding the world less likely to dance for him than it would even a few years ago. This is probably a personal shock to him.

This Ukrainian war basically defeated NATO. Hilarious to basically get destroyed in a war you're not even fighting in.

Anonymous wrote:lol Putin just launched one of the biggest drone attacks targeting civilians the day before he is going to meet with Trump.

Trump is so weak.

Yes. Being a Putin fan boy looks pathetic. But I think Trump is starting to realize that. The positive energy is with Macron and the new Pope, who will be meeting with Zelensky in the next couple of days. Europe is being pretty solid with its support of Ukraine and moving on from its dependency on the US. There's a lot going on. And Republicans are completely on the wrong side of things. Trump isn't an idiot politically. And so far, he's allowed the Biden era weapons support to continue - with the exception of Kursk, when he and Musk blinded Ukraine. But that put the US in a weak position ultimately and no one trusts the US anymore. That was very costly for the US when they actively helped Russia. That didn't go well for Trump. And Putin obviously has no interest in peace. I think Trump is starting to develop some personal enmity with Putin - like with Netanyahu. Which is good.

lol Putin just launched one of the biggest drone attacks targeting civilians the day before he is going to meet with Trump.

Trump is so weak.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3looagwu5zh26

REPORTER: Will you be asking China to help you close the gap between Ukraine and Russia?

TRUMP: I think so. If we weren't involved, Russia would be going at it to maybe get the whole thing, and without our involvement, they'd be able to get it. Because we supplied a lot different things. Foolishly.


Uh, if Russia could have taken all of Ukraine, it would have done so already.

This slow pace, whether initially intentional or not, is really the best move now. A slow grind is basically the last thing NATO is made to fight. It's exposing all the fault lines on the cheap.

You make no sense. Every day Russia loses about 1,500-2,000 troops and oil is projected to go to $40. Though glad to know how much you hate NATO.

If there was any truth to those numbers sure, but it's all made up. This is the disinfo bubble keeping the conflict going and which made Vance look the fool. You think you're being slick but you're doing more to end NATO then I ever could.

Man are u even n American?

Let me guess, you think NATO was founded in 1776 by George Washington himself. Isolationism has always been the cornerstone of American foreign policy.

So you are not an American.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3looagwu5zh26

REPORTER: Will you be asking China to help you close the gap between Ukraine and Russia?

TRUMP: I think so. If we weren't involved, Russia would be going at it to maybe get the whole thing, and without our involvement, they'd be able to get it. Because we supplied a lot different things. Foolishly.


Uh, if Russia could have taken all of Ukraine, it would have done so already.

This slow pace, whether initially intentional or not, is really the best move now. A slow grind is basically the last thing NATO is made to fight. It's exposing all the fault lines on the cheap.

You make no sense. Every day Russia loses about 1,500-2,000 troops and oil is projected to go to $40. Though glad to know how much you hate NATO.

If there was any truth to those numbers sure, but it's all made up. This is the disinfo bubble keeping the conflict going and which made Vance look the fool. You think you're being slick but you're doing more to end NATO then I ever could.

Man are u even n American?

Let me guess, you think NATO was founded in 1776 by George Washington himself. Isolationism has always been the cornerstone of American foreign policy.

^ this is exactly what a Russian troll would want Americans to believe.

Go back to school, you dope. Learn about Barbary Pirates, Monroe Doctrine etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3looagwu5zh26

REPORTER: Will you be asking China to help you close the gap between Ukraine and Russia?

TRUMP: I think so. If we weren't involved, Russia would be going at it to maybe get the whole thing, and without our involvement, they'd be able to get it. Because we supplied a lot different things. Foolishly.


Uh, if Russia could have taken all of Ukraine, it would have done so already.

This slow pace, whether initially intentional or not, is really the best move now. A slow grind is basically the last thing NATO is made to fight. It's exposing all the fault lines on the cheap.

You make no sense. Every day Russia loses about 1,500-2,000 troops and oil is projected to go to $40. Though glad to know how much you hate NATO.

If there was any truth to those numbers sure, but it's all made up. This is the disinfo bubble keeping the conflict going and which made Vance look the fool. You think you're being slick but you're doing more to end NATO then I ever could.

Man are u even n American?

Let me guess, you think NATO was founded in 1776 by George Washington himself. Isolationism has always been the cornerstone of American foreign policy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3looagwu5zh26

REPORTER: Will you be asking China to help you close the gap between Ukraine and Russia?

TRUMP: I think so. If we weren't involved, Russia would be going at it to maybe get the whole thing, and without our involvement, they'd be able to get it. Because we supplied a lot different things. Foolishly.


Uh, if Russia could have taken all of Ukraine, it would have done so already.

This slow pace, whether initially intentional or not, is really the best move now. A slow grind is basically the last thing NATO is made to fight. It's exposing all the fault lines on the cheap.

You make no sense. Every day Russia loses about 1,500-2,000 troops and oil is projected to go to $40. Though glad to know how much you hate NATO.

If there was any truth to those numbers sure, but it's all made up. This is the disinfo bubble keeping the conflict going and which made Vance look the fool. You think you're being slick but you're doing more to end NATO then I ever could.

Man are u even n American?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3looagwu5zh26

REPORTER: Will you be asking China to help you close the gap between Ukraine and Russia?

TRUMP: I think so. If we weren't involved, Russia would be going at it to maybe get the whole thing, and without our involvement, they'd be able to get it. Because we supplied a lot different things. Foolishly.


Uh, if Russia could have taken all of Ukraine, it would have done so already.

This slow pace, whether initially intentional or not, is really the best move now. A slow grind is basically the last thing NATO is made to fight. It's exposing all the fault lines on the cheap.

You make no sense. Every day Russia loses about 1,500-2,000 troops and oil is projected to go to $40. Though glad to know how much you hate NATO.

If there was any truth to those numbers sure, but it's all made up. This is the disinfo bubble keeping the conflict going and which made Vance look the fool. You think you're being slick but you're doing more to end NATO then I ever could.

Well, the BBC went through all available data recently and are estimating 170,000 to 240,000 combat deaths for Russians so far. The ratio of injured to killed is going to vary by the strength of medevac and immediate care. The US is very good and has it down to about 10:1. Russia will be nowhere near that. Partly bc the nature of this war makes it impossible to use helicopters and it's extremely difficult to pick up injured soldiers because of drones. Optimistically, they are looking at a 4:1 ratio. So, basically a million Russian casualties for this profoundly stupid invasion.

And in the meantime, Finland and Sweden have joined NATO. And Germany is now committed to being the most powerful conventional military in Europe. All of western Europe has ramped up their military spending. Russia's invasion of Ukraine has been a strategic disaster for them.

And if you spend anytime looking at combat footage from that war, you can see how Russians are losing 1000-1500 soldiers every single day. It's a brutal war.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3looagwu5zh26

REPORTER: Will you be asking China to help you close the gap between Ukraine and Russia?

TRUMP: I think so. If we weren't involved, Russia would be going at it to maybe get the whole thing, and without our involvement, they'd be able to get it. Because we supplied a lot different things. Foolishly.


Uh, if Russia could have taken all of Ukraine, it would have done so already.

This slow pace, whether initially intentional or not, is really the best move now. A slow grind is basically the last thing NATO is made to fight. It's exposing all the fault lines on the cheap.

You make no sense. Every day Russia loses about 1,500-2,000 troops and oil is projected to go to $40. Though glad to know how much you hate NATO.

If there was any truth to those numbers sure, but it's all made up. This is the disinfo bubble keeping the conflict going and which made Vance look the fool. You think you're being slick but you're doing more to end NATO then I ever could.

Russian milbloggers have admitted confirmed big Russian losses many times. I have no reason to doubt that Russia has been hemmorhaging troops on the frontline meatgrinder.

No one came back to talk about the latest round in Istanbul? Sad!

The best part of it is that the entire conversation took place in Russian.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3looagwu5zh26

REPORTER: Will you be asking China to help you close the gap between Ukraine and Russia?

TRUMP: I think so. If we weren't involved, Russia would be going at it to maybe get the whole thing, and without our involvement, they'd be able to get it. Because we supplied a lot different things. Foolishly.


Uh, if Russia could have taken all of Ukraine, it would have done so already.

This slow pace, whether initially intentional or not, is really the best move now. A slow grind is basically the last thing NATO is made to fight. It's exposing all the fault lines on the cheap.

You make no sense. Every day Russia loses about 1,500-2,000 troops and oil is projected to go to $40. Though glad to know how much you hate NATO.

If there was any truth to those numbers sure, but it's all made up. This is the disinfo bubble keeping the conflict going and which made Vance look the fool. You think you're being slick but you're doing more to end NATO then I ever could.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3looagwu5zh26

REPORTER: Will you be asking China to help you close the gap between Ukraine and Russia?

TRUMP: I think so. If we weren't involved, Russia would be going at it to maybe get the whole thing, and without our involvement, they'd be able to get it. Because we supplied a lot different things. Foolishly.


Uh, if Russia could have taken all of Ukraine, it would have done so already.

This slow pace, whether initially intentional or not, is really the best move now. A slow grind is basically the last thing NATO is made to fight. It's exposing all the fault lines on the cheap.

You make no sense. Every day Russia loses about 1,500-2,000 troops and oil is projected to go to $40. Though glad to know how much you hate NATO.