Anonymous wrote:wow. Vance is good.

He is a good debater. Good points. Walz is losing.

Vance is so much more polished and smooth! Also more handsome!

And I am so glad the VP debates never count! Because Vance is also a vicious, opportunist liar and I hope he gets his karma.

Vance is a talented orator for sure. He is the much much better speaker. Waltz is better than Harris, but he looks like he is missing his teeth.

Anonymous wrote:Why does he always say “first of all”

20 years of Langley sponsored “media training”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance is wiping the floor.

You may not like him, but his answers are polished and effective.

Effective how? He is repelling me.

Anonymous wrote:wow. Vance is good.

No he's not.

Harris should have picked Shapiro. Walz is not ready for prime time.

wow. Vance is good.

Does Vance not believe in climate change?

First of all! Twice in the same answer.

Why does he always say “first of all”

Anonymous wrote:Headaches.

Yes! Quoting Trump in almost real time! So glad Walz brought that up!

Two effeminate empty suits parroting hot air talking points. Why does this debate even matter? It’s pointless.

"first of all" - drink!

Anonymous wrote:Vance is wiping the floor.

You may not like him, but his answers are polished and effective.