Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
A 30 minute drive from many cities will put you in areas of extreme poverty. Try taking a 30 minute drive from Asheville, NC and take a look...
Well of course if you use a city in the Blue Ridge Mountains, 30 minutes out is going to take you to some unsavory places. But for most metro areas, including Cincinnati, this isn't true.
Anonymous wrote:
A 30 minute drive from many cities will put you in areas of extreme poverty. Try taking a 30 minute drive from Asheville, NC and take a look...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction
JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.
JD was fat and out of shape when he entered the military. He saw no combat - he worked in the communications office instead of going to battle. To suggest he's a big war expert is a big stretch...
His experiences in military would be the only experience a a Pres or VP has had since George W. I see it as a huge benefit, regardless of if he took a bullet. There is a lot more to the military than fighting
I disagree. Trump used a bone spur to dodge the draft during Viet Nam but was able to play tennis with a bone spur. If Vance had a cushy desk job during the Iraq war, yes, he was in the armed forces but the question is why didn't he put his life on the line like so many others. Including Beau Biden? First thing that comes to mind is cowardice. Two cowards on the GOP ticket.
Good grief. He enlisted in the Marines and served in a war zone. He did put his life on the line.
I bet you are unaware that Biden received at least 6 deferments from the draft. One because he had asthma as a teenager yet he also played sports.
Which branch did Kamala serve in?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction
JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.
JD was fat and out of shape when he entered the military. He saw no combat - he worked in the communications office instead of going to battle. To suggest he's a big war expert is a big stretch...
His experiences in military would be the only experience a a Pres or VP has had since George W. I see it as a huge benefit, regardless of if he took a bullet. There is a lot more to the military than fighting
I disagree. Trump used a bone spur to dodge the draft during Viet Nam but was able to play tennis with a bone spur. If Vance had a cushy desk job during the Iraq war, yes, he was in the armed forces but the question is why didn't he put his life on the line like so many others. Including Beau Biden? First thing that comes to mind is cowardice. Two cowards on the GOP ticket.
How did Joe Biden get five deferments?
Anonymous wrote:Going back to the idea of universal child care, I agree with Vance on this issue.
Who would want to send their precious children to a government run facility starting as an infant? Horrible idea.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction
JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.
JD was fat and out of shape when he entered the military. He saw no combat - he worked in the communications office instead of going to battle. To suggest he's a big war expert is a big stretch...
His experiences in military would be the only experience a a Pres or VP has had since George W. I see it as a huge benefit, regardless of if he took a bullet. There is a lot more to the military than fighting
I disagree. Trump used a bone spur to dodge the draft during Viet Nam but was able to play tennis with a bone spur. If Vance had a cushy desk job during the Iraq war, yes, he was in the armed forces but the question is why didn't he put his life on the line like so many others. Including Beau Biden? First thing that comes to mind is cowardice. Two cowards on the GOP ticket.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction
JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.
JD was fat and out of shape when he entered the military. He saw no combat - he worked in the communications office instead of going to battle. To suggest he's a big war expert is a big stretch...
His experiences in military would be the only experience a a Pres or VP has had since George W. I see it as a huge benefit, regardless of if he took a bullet. There is a lot more to the military than fighting
I disagree. Trump used a bone spur to dodge the draft during Viet Nam but was able to play tennis with a bone spur. If Vance had a cushy desk job during the Iraq war, yes, he was in the armed forces but the question is why didn't he put his life on the line like so many others. Including Beau Biden? First thing that comes to mind is cowardice. Two cowards on the GOP ticket.
Good grief. He enlisted in the Marines and served in a war zone. He did put his life on the line.
I bet you are unaware that Biden received at least 6 deferments from the draft. One because he had asthma as a teenager yet he also played sports.
Which branch did Kamala serve in?
Writing for a newspaper far from any combat is not "putting his life on the line"
He was a desk jockey.
What utter bullshit. Do you hav any idea of how many combat correspondents have been killed in the line of duty? There is a reason they are called “combat” correspondents.
They were imbedded in military units on battlefields. Vance was imbedded with a desk far from any combat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction
JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.
JD was fat and out of shape when he entered the military. He saw no combat - he worked in the communications office instead of going to battle. To suggest he's a big war expert is a big stretch...
His experiences in military would be the only experience a a Pres or VP has had since George W. I see it as a huge benefit, regardless of if he took a bullet. There is a lot more to the military than fighting
I disagree. Trump used a bone spur to dodge the draft during Viet Nam but was able to play tennis with a bone spur. If Vance had a cushy desk job during the Iraq war, yes, he was in the armed forces but the question is why didn't he put his life on the line like so many others. Including Beau Biden? First thing that comes to mind is cowardice. Two cowards on the GOP ticket.
Good grief. He enlisted in the Marines and served in a war zone. He did put his life on the line.
I bet you are unaware that Biden received at least 6 deferments from the draft. One because he had asthma as a teenager yet he also played sports.
Which branch did Kamala serve in?
Writing for a newspaper far from any combat is not "putting his life on the line"
He was a desk jockey.
What utter bullshit. Do you hav any idea of how many combat correspondents have been killed in the line of duty? There is a reason they are called “combat” correspondents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction
JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.
JD was fat and out of shape when he entered the military. He saw no combat - he worked in the communications office instead of going to battle. To suggest he's a big war expert is a big stretch...
His experiences in military would be the only experience a a Pres or VP has had since George W. I see it as a huge benefit, regardless of if he took a bullet. There is a lot more to the military than fighting
I disagree. Trump used a bone spur to dodge the draft during Viet Nam but was able to play tennis with a bone spur. If Vance had a cushy desk job during the Iraq war, yes, he was in the armed forces but the question is why didn't he put his life on the line like so many others. Including Beau Biden? First thing that comes to mind is cowardice. Two cowards on the GOP ticket.
Good grief. He enlisted in the Marines and served in a war zone. He did put his life on the line.
I bet you are unaware that Biden received at least 6 deferments from the draft. One because he had asthma as a teenager yet he also played sports.
Which branch did Kamala serve in?