Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t know anyone who does. I live in Capitol Hill. Maybe our neighborhood isn’t nice enough?
I live in Capitol Hill and know two families in this situation. In one instance, they used to live in a much smaller house on the Hill and I was confused when they "upgraded" because they have very middle class jobs. But then they mentioned the house had been in her family and it made sense. There is no resentment there-- it was useful to understand.
Do those two families make you feel like people who want to buy are shut out?
I mean it's not about feelings. As a practical matter homes that are passed down through generations are homes that never hit the housing market. Capitol Hill has notoriously low inventory and I'm sure the houses that get kept in families (which I really do think is actually fairly common in this area) contribute to that low inventory. So yes as a practical matter families that keep homes in the family and pass them down contribute to fewer people being able to buy in this neighborhood. Same with people who choose to rent out their homes instead of sell them which has become very common in recent years as people perceive the current market as less explosive than prior markets and are loathe to give up an appreciating asset now when rates might depress prices some.
But recognizing that these things factor into the cost of housing and may make it harder for others to buy is not the same as resenting people for making these perfectly reasonable choices. But understanding that these choices factor into low inventory and high prices can also help people who are navigating the market for the first time better understand the landscape. Sure at first they might feel frustrated because they want to buy into a neighborhood and can't becasue there are so few homes on the market and you have to pay a premium for them. But understanding what is goign on will ultimately make them more informed buyers and help them make choices (including the choice to move on and buy elsewhere understanding that these homes are not suddenly goign to come on the market).
Info is power.
I don't think this is true at all. Is there actual data that this is a significant factor across the board? High prices make it difficult for people who consider the prices high but not that many homes are not sitting empty so there is still a market and people who can afford it.
Anonymous wrote:One was recently in the news. The neighbors of the Alitos.
They both live in a nice neighborhood, and the neighbors are living with their mom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've been living close to downtown Bethesda for more than 10 years, know hundreds of people from elementary, middle and high schools in the area because my kids are older teens, and NO, this is not a common occurrence, OP.
Why are you so obsessed with other people's living arrangements? We have no family help or high salaries, yet I have zero issues with the people who do. DH and I will be the generation who helps their children. If you have money, you'll do the same for your children. See how that works? Why is it a problem when others do it, but not when you do it?
Your jealousy is making you really stupid.
PP, we may live in the same Bethesda neighborhood.
OP is talking about DC. Have you ever lived in DC? There is a world of difference. OP is speaking of Old Money DC families who are preserving wealth by keeping it in the family. Super common among DC Old Guard who’ve been here since 1920s or earlier. Bethesda barely existed then - earliest homes in my neighborhood are from the ‘30s, with most from the ‘40s. Even here, there are people living in grandparents homes, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes this is common -- we live on the Hill and know several families who can only afford to live here because they are living in a parent or grandparent's home that was purchased for like 20 decades ago. It doesn't upset me -- it means there are more people here with our similiar finances and it also means they don't look down on us for living in a condo instead of a row home because neither of us can actually afford the row home.
If it seemed like they were beng smug about it I guess it would bother me but at least in our case people are not and recognize that if they didn't have this good fortune they could not afford to live here.
This here. We've made many mixed housing type communities illegal to zoning. I'd love to make our home into a duplex for grandparents and us. But we can't. So we do this instead.
Anonymous wrote:I've been living close to downtown Bethesda for more than 10 years, know hundreds of people from elementary, middle and high schools in the area because my kids are older teens, and NO, this is not a common occurrence, OP.
Why are you so obsessed with other people's living arrangements? We have no family help or high salaries, yet I have zero issues with the people who do. DH and I will be the generation who helps their children. If you have money, you'll do the same for your children. See how that works? Why is it a problem when others do it, but not when you do it?
Your jealousy is making you really stupid.
Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of 'families' living in McMansions with 20 people and 10 cars. It really brings down the look of the neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t know anyone who does. I live in Capitol Hill. Maybe our neighborhood isn’t nice enough?
I live in Capitol Hill and know two families in this situation. In one instance, they used to live in a much smaller house on the Hill and I was confused when they "upgraded" because they have very middle class jobs. But then they mentioned the house had been in her family and it made sense. There is no resentment there-- it was useful to understand.
Do those two families make you feel like people who want to buy are shut out?
I mean it's not about feelings. As a practical matter homes that are passed down through generations are homes that never hit the housing market. Capitol Hill has notoriously low inventory and I'm sure the houses that get kept in families (which I really do think is actually fairly common in this area) contribute to that low inventory. So yes as a practical matter families that keep homes in the family and pass them down contribute to fewer people being able to buy in this neighborhood. Same with people who choose to rent out their homes instead of sell them which has become very common in recent years as people perceive the current market as less explosive than prior markets and are loathe to give up an appreciating asset now when rates might depress prices some.
But recognizing that these things factor into the cost of housing and may make it harder for others to buy is not the same as resenting people for making these perfectly reasonable choices. But understanding that these choices factor into low inventory and high prices can also help people who are navigating the market for the first time better understand the landscape. Sure at first they might feel frustrated because they want to buy into a neighborhood and can't becasue there are so few homes on the market and you have to pay a premium for them. But understanding what is goign on will ultimately make them more informed buyers and help them make choices (including the choice to move on and buy elsewhere understanding that these homes are not suddenly goign to come on the market).
Info is power.
Anonymous wrote:For Mr. “Info is Power”: If so many people are renting out their homes rather than selling, why are rents so damn high and rentals in short supply? I didn’t go to a school in an upscale neighborhood, like your kindergartener, so I eagerly await your reply.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t know anyone who does. I live in Capitol Hill. Maybe our neighborhood isn’t nice enough?
I live in Capitol Hill and know two families in this situation. In one instance, they used to live in a much smaller house on the Hill and I was confused when they "upgraded" because they have very middle class jobs. But then they mentioned the house had been in her family and it made sense. There is no resentment there-- it was useful to understand.
Do those two families make you feel like people who want to buy are shut out?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I live in Capitol Hill and know two families in this situation. In one instance, they used to live in a much smaller house on the Hill and I was confused when they "upgraded" because they have very middle class jobs. But then they mentioned the house had been in her family and it made sense. There is no resentment there-- it was useful to understand.
This is such a strange take. Many, many wealthy people who work do so in “middle class” jobs, often in non-profits, the arts, advancement, education, etc. They choose to use their excellent education, connections, and experience in service to others and society. The majority of actual wealth in America is transferred not merely earned through a job. A middle class job often says nothing at all about a person’s net worth or access to wealth.
You’re making assumptions about people based on limited information and wasting valuable emotional real estate being “confused” about things that have nothing to do with you.
Another poster said that comparison is just the way the world works. That’s just not true. It does not work that way for everyone. You can think better thoughts.
I tried to quote another user and apparently did it wrong.😑