Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one who is going. To Barnard should be saying they’re going to Columbia. But the schools are combined in many aspect. My DH who went to Columbia views them as one and the same and views his Barnard counterparts as classmates.

So Barnard students shouldn’t consider themselves part of the Columbia student body but Columbia students should consider Barnard students part of Columbia? Right. Gotcha. Crystal clear.

FWIW, Barnard IS an official college of Columbia. It’s not some loose affiliation. This may offend the notions of some on here who think they know the exact pecking order of universities in this country, but it’s just a fact.

https://catalog.barnard.edu/barnard-college/college/#:~:text=Barnard%20is%20both%20an%20independently,rich%2C%20value%2Denhancing%20partnership.

Why not use one name then?

OP

Barnard is an affiliate. They have to pay annually to Columbia for it.

Show us the evidence

It's in Columbia's official documents. You can search for it. They paid a few millions per year. When I have time, I can find the document for you.

I don’t see anything to support your claims

Just in case this link hasn't been posted:
https://www.columbia.edu/content/academics/schools

Note, Columbia College, SEAS (Fu School of Engineering), GS, and Barnard are all listed, as well as the various graduate schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one who is going. To Barnard should be saying they’re going to Columbia. But the schools are combined in many aspect. My DH who went to Columbia views them as one and the same and views his Barnard counterparts as classmates.

So Barnard students shouldn’t consider themselves part of the Columbia student body but Columbia students should consider Barnard students part of Columbia? Right. Gotcha. Crystal clear.

FWIW, Barnard IS an official college of Columbia. It’s not some loose affiliation. This may offend the notions of some on here who think they know the exact pecking order of universities in this country, but it’s just a fact.

https://catalog.barnard.edu/barnard-college/college/#:~:text=Barnard%20is%20both%20an%20independently,rich%2C%20value%2Denhancing%20partnership.

Why not use one name then?

OP

Barnard is an affiliate. They have to pay annually to Columbia for it.

Show us the evidence

It's in Columbia's official documents. You can search for it. They paid a few millions per year. When I have time, I can find the document for you.

I don’t see anything to support your claims

Just in case this link hasn't been posted:
https://www.columbia.edu/content/academics/schools

Note, Columbia College, SEAS (Fu School of Engineering), GS, and Barnard are all listed, as well as the various graduate schools.

Barnard is an affiliate, so it's listed here so people can get redirected to its website.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one who is going. To Barnard should be saying they’re going to Columbia. But the schools are combined in many aspect. My DH who went to Columbia views them as one and the same and views his Barnard counterparts as classmates.

So Barnard students shouldn’t consider themselves part of the Columbia student body but Columbia students should consider Barnard students part of Columbia? Right. Gotcha. Crystal clear.

FWIW, Barnard IS an official college of Columbia. It’s not some loose affiliation. This may offend the notions of some on here who think they know the exact pecking order of universities in this country, but it’s just a fact.

https://catalog.barnard.edu/barnard-college/college/#:~:text=Barnard%20is%20both%20an%20independently,rich%2C%20value%2Denhancing%20partnership.

Why not use one name then?

OP

Barnard is an affiliate. They have to pay annually to Columbia for it.

Show us the evidence

It's in Columbia's official documents. You can search for it. They paid a few millions per year. When I have time, I can find the document for you.

I don’t see anything to support your claims

Just in case this link hasn't been posted:
https://www.columbia.edu/content/academics/schools

Note, Columbia College, SEAS (Fu School of Engineering), GS, and Barnard are all listed, as well as the various graduate schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one who is going. To Barnard should be saying they’re going to Columbia. But the schools are combined in many aspect. My DH who went to Columbia views them as one and the same and views his Barnard counterparts as classmates.

So Barnard students shouldn’t consider themselves part of the Columbia student body but Columbia students should consider Barnard students part of Columbia? Right. Gotcha. Crystal clear.

FWIW, Barnard IS an official college of Columbia. It’s not some loose affiliation. This may offend the notions of some on here who think they know the exact pecking order of universities in this country, but it’s just a fact.

https://catalog.barnard.edu/barnard-college/college/#:~:text=Barnard%20is%20both%20an%20independently,rich%2C%20value%2Denhancing%20partnership.

Why not use one name then?

OP

Barnard is an affiliate. They have to pay annually to Columbia for it.

Show us the evidence

It's in Columbia's official documents. You can search for it. They paid a few millions per year. When I have time, I can find the document for you.

I don’t see anything to support your claims

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the record, if you cite US News, Dartmouth now is the weakest Ivy. Just saying. Columbia and Cornell 12. You need to go down to 18 to find Dartmouth--where, as the song goes, somebody I used to know was located--Cornell, but now Dartmouth is there.

Columbia, the 2nd weakest Ivy!