Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares about the cleavage. The point isn't that she was showing cleavage. It's that she was intentionally doing so as part of the whole strange caricature she was presenting. It's just one small obviously contrived aspect of an obviously contrived presentation that screamed inauthenticity.

+1 The cleavage isn’t too weird, alone. The kitchen isn’t either. The panting line delivery is weird, but it’s the altogether that is bizarre.

But there was no cleavage. Literally. None. Just a woman and her neck and upper chest. You cannot see the line between her breasts, which is what cleavage is.

I suspect the people saying this don't speak English as a first language. Cleavage specifically refers to the space between breasts. It isn't the larger area-- neck, chest, shoulders-- that a word like décolletage refers to. The English word cleavage refers to something that you cannot see on Sen Britt in this video.

+1
Thank you. Amazing how triggered Democrats are by a woman in a completely normal v-neck blouse showing zero cleavage at all. It's almost as if... they're hypocritical misogynists!

It's because they believe that Republicans are opposed to women's sexuality and see everything through that lens. So they reflexively sexualize Republican women out of retaliation. It's hypocritical but fits well within their worldview.

Anonymous wrote:The million dollar question: did Katie Britt use IVF to have her children? Has anyone asked the soccer mom Senator from Alabama about this?

From a statistical standpoint, it seems unlikely she used IVF. Most women are able to become pregnant without medical intervention.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares about the cleavage. The point isn't that she was showing cleavage. It's that she was intentionally doing so as part of the whole strange caricature she was presenting. It's just one small obviously contrived aspect of an obviously contrived presentation that screamed inauthenticity.

+1 The cleavage isn’t too weird, alone. The kitchen isn’t either. The panting line delivery is weird, but it’s the altogether that is bizarre.

But there was no cleavage. Literally. None. Just a woman and her neck and upper chest. You cannot see the line between her breasts, which is what cleavage is.

I suspect the people saying this don't speak English as a first language. Cleavage specifically refers to the space between breasts. It isn't the larger area-- neck, chest, shoulders-- that a word like décolletage refers to. The English word cleavage refers to something that you cannot see on Sen Britt in this video.

+1
Thank you. Amazing how triggered Democrats are by a woman in a completely normal v-neck blouse showing zero cleavage at all. It's almost as if... they're hypocritical misogynists!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The million dollar question: did Katie Britt use IVF to have her children? Has anyone asked the soccer mom Senator from Alabama about this?

Not likely.
She’s 42 with middle school aged kids.
Unlikely she needed help getting pregnant.
It must be nice to have the money for childcare, and not have to put your career on hold.

cheap shot. These are petty reasons why GOP and “undecideds” exist.

Yeah.. can we not go there when talking about women leaders (or supreme court judges or women CEOs or whatever ) with children. Even if they have more than two. Let’s leave out the personal speculation and cheap shots about medical interventions. Or do you always write the first thing that pops into your head ?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The million dollar question: did Katie Britt use IVF to have her children? Has anyone asked the soccer mom Senator from Alabama about this?

Not likely.
She’s 42 with middle school aged kids.
Unlikely she needed help getting pregnant.
It must be nice to have the money for childcare, and not have to put your career on hold.

It takes two to tango. Plenty of male infertility out there boys.

This is what happens when Republicans only speak to church groups and local Chambers of Commerce who will accept and applaud whatever they say as long as it includes how horribly Christians and business owners are persecuted. No one ever fact checks them back home. Fact-checking Republicans is persecution. They are never prepared for any scrutiny of their bullshit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The million dollar question: did Katie Britt use IVF to have her children? Has anyone asked the soccer mom Senator from Alabama about this?

that's not the million dollar question. What is:
If the woman who was sex trafficked became pregnant should she have been allowed an abortion?
Should the woman who was sex trafficked have been forced to stay in Mexico where she was trafficked or was she eligible for asylum?

What happened to the sex-trafficked woman didn't happen in the US. All of that's further up in the thread.

Another Alabama housewife's message to Katie Britt
https://twitter.com/naretevduorp/status/1766515024300798427

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The cleavage discussion is distracting from the plagarism and lying

+1

The rape story sounded like BS. No way someone could be raped continuosuly for hours on end and live to tell about it.

I do not agree with the GOP in any shape way or form, but I hate to break it to you, yes, that happens, and yes they generally survive (unless the criminal/s flat out murder the victim).

For hours on end? I don't believe you. Women in India die from gang rapes all the time that don't last as long as the ine she described did.

Please stop. You do not know what you are talking about.

Rape can occur with or without physical injury.

Females, including children, have lived through years of rape.

You are clueless as to the horrors that exist in this world.

We're talking not talkimg about a single occurrence of rape, we're talking about someone being raped non-stop, for hours and hours, by a never ending stream of cartel members. Until you can at least acknowledge the deaths of women who have been gang raped to death before, then maybe you're the one who should stop.

NP but I don’t think anyone is discounting the horrors of what this woman went through. I just don’t see why someone would bring it up in the response to the President’s state of the union when it happened in Mexico 15-20 years ago and has nothing to do with the current president.

What bothers me most about this is that Senator Britt says, “We wouldn’t be okay with this happening in a third world country.” And then she follows it with, “This is the United States of America.” The sex trafficking, as we now know, didn’t occur in the United States. But if it did, the logical follow-up would be something like, “But it didn’t happen in a third world country. It happened here in the United States.” That’s how you would deliver the most emotional impact. But Senator Britt very carefully avoided saying that to give herself plausible deniability later if someone called her on it. (And someone did.) That means she *deliberately* misled millions of people with an emotionally charged story that she knew was untrue—FOR POLITICS. It’s just disgusting. I guess bearing false witness is okay for some people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What gets me is that she is so fake and phony. She has been a Washington power broker her whole professional life, which is fine, but she pretends to be the cute Mom next door who gets her kids to the bus stop the rushes off to volunteer at school and get in a couple sets of tennis and bake cookies before the kids get home. The BS factor is up there with Elizabeth Warren saying “hmm, I’m gonna get me a beer” and Hilary Clinton wearing a Yankees hat and trying to talk with a Bronx accent.

She does seem weird. I wonder why she was chosen for the rebuttal.

Suburban Gen X Women are the major swing vote this election. Her performance was what the GOP thinks those voters are like.

It’s hilarious how wrong they are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The cleavage discussion is distracting from the plagarism and lying

+1

The rape story sounded like BS. No way someone could be raped continuosuly for hours on end and live to tell about it.

I do not agree with the GOP in any shape way or form, but I hate to break it to you, yes, that happens, and yes they generally survive (unless the criminal/s flat out murder the victim).

For hours on end? I don't believe you. Women in India die from gang rapes all the time that don't last as long as the ine she described did.

Please stop. You do not know what you are talking about.

Rape can occur with or without physical injury.

Females, including children, have lived through years of rape.

You are clueless as to the horrors that exist in this world.

We're talking not talkimg about a single occurrence of rape, we're talking about someone being raped non-stop, for hours and hours, by a never ending stream of cartel members. Until you can at least acknowledge the deaths of women who have been gang raped to death before, then maybe you're the one who should stop.

NP but I don’t think anyone is discounting the horrors of what this woman went through. I just don’t see why someone would bring it up in the response to the President’s state of the union when it happened in Mexico 15-20 years ago and has nothing to do with the current president.

Her rebuttal will go down as one of the worst in history. OMG it was like a bad SNL skit.

Anonymous wrote:The million dollar question: did Katie Britt use IVF to have her children? Has anyone asked the soccer mom Senator from Alabama about this?

that's not the million dollar question. What is:
If the woman who was sex trafficked became pregnant should she have been allowed an abortion?
Should the woman who was sex trafficked have been forced to stay in Mexico where she was trafficked or was she eligible for asylum?

Anonymous wrote:The million dollar question: did Katie Britt use IVF to have her children? Has anyone asked the soccer mom Senator from Alabama about this?

Not likely.
She’s 42 with middle school aged kids.
Unlikely she needed help getting pregnant.
It must be nice to have the money for childcare, and not have to put your career on hold.