Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is direct from Chen Ling's website:"The diversity of backgrounds has the potential to enrich the experience for all children. It also creates risks that children will fall behind or face safety risks due to bullying or juvenile behavior."

Is he really saying what I think he's saying? Diversity of backgrounds creates safety risks in his world!

As an Asian, there is a lot of antiblackness in our community. Not surprised that Chen says it out loud.

He may be the candidate for the small vocal AEM crowd, but going to his website is eye opening, so thanks for the prodding. I can’t vote for him.

I think he’s more APE than AEM.

OP. Oh, for sure. It's funny that he posts on AEM so much. It's the same 25 people who engage there. Everyone else knows better. No current candidate or SB member really ventures in that hellhole.

Do the APE crazies still post a lot? Last I checked it was mostly them finding any excuse to beech about APS.

95% APE doing "research" to stir sheet up among the masses. Or to wax poetically about "learning loss" four years later while at the same time minimizing the actual pandemic. I honestly just stay for the teacher/union member.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is direct from Chen Ling's website:"The diversity of backgrounds has the potential to enrich the experience for all children. It also creates risks that children will fall behind or face safety risks due to bullying or juvenile behavior."

Is he really saying what I think he's saying? Diversity of backgrounds creates safety risks in his world!

As an Asian, there is a lot of antiblackness in our community. Not surprised that Chen says it out loud.

He may be the candidate for the small vocal AEM crowd, but going to his website is eye opening, so thanks for the prodding. I can’t vote for him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is direct from Chen Ling's website:"The diversity of backgrounds has the potential to enrich the experience for all children. It also creates risks that children will fall behind or face safety risks due to bullying or juvenile behavior."

Is he really saying what I think he's saying? Diversity of backgrounds creates safety risks in his world!

As an Asian, there is a lot of antiblackness in our community. Not surprised that Chen says it out loud.

He may be the candidate for the small vocal AEM crowd, but going to his website is eye opening, so thanks for the prodding. I can’t vote for him.

I think he’s more APE than AEM.

OP. Oh, for sure. It's funny that he posts on AEM so much. It's the same 25 people who engage there. Everyone else knows better. No current candidate or SB member really ventures in that hellhole.

Do the APE crazies still post a lot? Last I checked it was mostly them finding any excuse to beech about APS.

95% APE doing "research" to stir sheet up among the masses. Or to wax poetically about "learning loss" four years later while at the same time minimizing the actual pandemic. I honestly just stay for the teacher/union member.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only two candidates IMO are Kathleen and Zuraya. I don't know anything about Z but she's savvy enough to be wracking in all of the endorsements. Hopefully we will learn more about her in the upcoming candidate forums. And hopefully she's not APE.

CDT wracked up all the endorsements too, and that didn't turn out too well. I think if this whole process has shown us anything it's that we should take endorsements with a grain of salt.

+1

Can’t vote for Zuraya. She’s got the endorsements but sounds clueless.

Another +1. If she had spent the last two years getting truly engaged in APS instead of being groomed as the next Spanish-speaking candidate with zero qualifications she might be worth something.

Kathleen has my true heartfelt vote. I’m voting for Larry more because Chen and Zuraya are awful candidates.

She serves on an APS advisory committee. Larry sounds kinda APE-y too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only two candidates IMO are Kathleen and Zuraya. I don't know anything about Z but she's savvy enough to be wracking in all of the endorsements. Hopefully we will learn more about her in the upcoming candidate forums. And hopefully she's not APE.

CDT wracked up all the endorsements too, and that didn't turn out too well. I think if this whole process has shown us anything it's that we should take endorsements with a grain of salt.

+1

Can’t vote for Zuraya. She’s got the endorsements but sounds clueless.

Another +1. If she had spent the last two years getting truly engaged in APS instead of being groomed as the next Spanish-speaking candidate with zero qualifications she might be worth something.

Kathleen has my true heartfelt vote. I’m voting for Larry more because Chen and Zuraya are awful candidates.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is direct from Chen Ling's website:"The diversity of backgrounds has the potential to enrich the experience for all children. It also creates risks that children will fall behind or face safety risks due to bullying or juvenile behavior."

Is he really saying what I think he's saying? Diversity of backgrounds creates safety risks in his world!

As an Asian, there is a lot of antiblackness in our community. Not surprised that Chen says it out loud.

He may be the candidate for the small vocal AEM crowd, but going to his website is eye opening, so thanks for the prodding. I can’t vote for him.

I think he’s more APE than AEM.

OP. Oh, for sure. It's funny that he posts on AEM so much. It's the same 25 people who engage there. Everyone else knows better. No current candidate or SB member really ventures in that hellhole.

Do the APE crazies still post a lot? Last I checked it was mostly them finding any excuse to beech about APS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is direct from Chen Ling's website:"The diversity of backgrounds has the potential to enrich the experience for all children. It also creates risks that children will fall behind or face safety risks due to bullying or juvenile behavior."

Is he really saying what I think he's saying? Diversity of backgrounds creates safety risks in his world!

As an Asian, there is a lot of antiblackness in our community. Not surprised that Chen says it out loud.

He may be the candidate for the small vocal AEM crowd, but going to his website is eye opening, so thanks for the prodding. I can’t vote for him.

I think he’s more APE than AEM.

OP. Oh, for sure. It's funny that he posts on AEM so much. It's the same 25 people who engage there. Everyone else knows better. No current candidate or SB member really ventures in that hellhole.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is direct from Chen Ling's website:"The diversity of backgrounds has the potential to enrich the experience for all children. It also creates risks that children will fall behind or face safety risks due to bullying or juvenile behavior."

Is he really saying what I think he's saying? Diversity of backgrounds creates safety risks in his world!

As an Asian, there is a lot of antiblackness in our community. Not surprised that Chen says it out loud.

He may be the candidate for the small vocal AEM crowd, but going to his website is eye opening, so thanks for the prodding. I can’t vote for him.

I think he’s more APE than AEM.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is direct from Chen Ling's website:"The diversity of backgrounds has the potential to enrich the experience for all children. It also creates risks that children will fall behind or face safety risks due to bullying or juvenile behavior."

Is he really saying what I think he's saying? Diversity of backgrounds creates safety risks in his world!

As an Asian, there is a lot of antiblackness in our community. Not surprised that Chen says it out loud.

He may be the candidate for the small vocal AEM crowd, but going to his website is eye opening, so thanks for the prodding. I can’t vote for him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only two candidates IMO are Kathleen and Zuraya. I don't know anything about Z but she's savvy enough to be wracking in all of the endorsements. Hopefully we will learn more about her in the upcoming candidate forums. And hopefully she's not APE.

CDT wracked up all the endorsements too, and that didn't turn out too well. I think if this whole process has shown us anything it's that we should take endorsements with a grain of salt.

+1

Can’t vote for Zuraya. She’s got the endorsements but sounds clueless.

Another +1. If she had spent the last two years getting truly engaged in APS instead of being groomed as the next Spanish-speaking candidate with zero qualifications she might be worth something.

Kathleen has my true heartfelt vote. I’m voting for Larry more because Chen and Zuraya are awful candidates.

Anonymous wrote:This is direct from Chen Ling's website:"The diversity of backgrounds has the potential to enrich the experience for all children. It also creates risks that children will fall behind or face safety risks due to bullying or juvenile behavior."

Is he really saying what I think he's saying? Diversity of backgrounds creates safety risks in his world!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only two candidates IMO are Kathleen and Zuraya. I don't know anything about Z but she's savvy enough to be wracking in all of the endorsements. Hopefully we will learn more about her in the upcoming candidate forums. And hopefully she's not APE.

CDT wracked up all the endorsements too, and that didn't turn out too well. I think if this whole process has shown us anything it's that we should take endorsements with a grain of salt.

+1

Can’t vote for Zuraya. She’s got the endorsements but sounds clueless.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only two candidates IMO are Kathleen and Zuraya. I don't know anything about Z but she's savvy enough to be wracking in all of the endorsements. Hopefully we will learn more about her in the upcoming candidate forums. And hopefully she's not APE.

CDT wracked up all the endorsements too, and that didn't turn out too well. I think if this whole process has shown us anything it's that we should take endorsements with a grain of salt.