Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Trumps kids are healthy, happy and Ivy educated.
The country is healthier, happier (according to polls) and more powerful under Trump
Yikes. Are you blaming Biden for his son's cancer and death? Sicko.
Also you know that money buys entrance to elite schools, don't you. Just goes to show what an elitist Trump is.
Good point - one more piece of evidence that billionaire Trump has nothing in common with the vast majority of MAGA sycophants he cultivates ..,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Trumps kids are healthy, happy and Ivy educated.
The country is healthier, happier (according to polls) and more powerful under Trump
Yikes. Are you blaming Biden for his son's cancer and death? Sicko.
Also you know that money buys entrance to elite schools, don't you. Just goes to show what an elitist Trump is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Trump turned out to be right about the swamp being stupid and corrupt.
Everything they touch turns to crap.
He was the murkiest most compromised
Creature in the swamp
Populists always argue they are outside the swamp To curry favor favor with disaffected voters. Just like the ones who promise to step down after one term - they rarely do.
Trump abused the checks and balances on democracy for his own purposes over and over again - and continues to do so. He now has over 90 felony indictments, tens of thousands of proven lies and continues his base lies lies about losing 2020 election in order to avoid the jail time he likely faces.
Everything he touches turns to ruin - many people he has worked with face jail time themselves for enabling his illegal abuses of power.
Trump is the swamp
Anonymous wrote:
Trump turned out to be right about the swamp being stupid and corrupt.
Everything they touch turns to crap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone didn't learn from 2016 polls that polls are not always accurate.
Polls have also shown that the incumbent POTUS can be behind and still win.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/16/us/politics/biden-trump-election-presidents-polling.html
+1
For the incumbent president to lose, you’d need a *major* economic, foreign policy or domestic crisis. And probably a combination of at least two. GDP is strong, the unemployment rate is low and inflation is trending downward. Nobody has to wear masks at the grocery store any more. And say what you will about Ukraine and Israel, but not one American soldier has died in those conflicts. From that vantage point, Biden is going to be very hard to beat.
Have you been living under a rock? We have had this already with Biden’s inflation exploding costs for everything.
Inflation’s going down, my friend. I know that makes you sad but it’s the reality.
Most things cost substantially more today than they did when Biden was inaugurated and wages have not kept pace. You can try to explain it away but anyone who goes grocery shopping knows it.
It sounds like you think the president just decides that things should cost more.
Rounds of stimulus checks followed by $1 trillion in infrastructure spending as inflation was rising. Economists were screaming that it was inflationary, but the administration argued that inflation was transitory. Everyone not invested in build back better passing saw this coming and said so at the time
Criminals who stole PPP money aside, people spent that money which improves the economy.
Should we let our infrastructure crumble? When should we pay for it?
Corporate profits at all time highs the past few years - maybe you need to direct some of your anger towards companies taking advantage the opportunity to excuse their price increases.
Biden should run on an 'inflation was necessary' platform. I'm sure it will go great
His "build back better" was so close to "make america great again." Not sure how everyone was ok with that so maybe 'inflation was necessary' would work lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone didn't learn from 2016 polls that polls are not always accurate.
Polls have also shown that the incumbent POTUS can be behind and still win.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/16/us/politics/biden-trump-election-presidents-polling.html
+1
For the incumbent president to lose, you’d need a *major* economic, foreign policy or domestic crisis. And probably a combination of at least two. GDP is strong, the unemployment rate is low and inflation is trending downward. Nobody has to wear masks at the grocery store any more. And say what you will about Ukraine and Israel, but not one American soldier has died in those conflicts. From that vantage point, Biden is going to be very hard to beat.
Have you been living under a rock? We have had this already with Biden’s inflation exploding costs for everything.
Inflation’s going down, my friend. I know that makes you sad but it’s the reality.
Most things cost substantially more today than they did when Biden was inaugurated and wages have not kept pace. You can try to explain it away but anyone who goes grocery shopping knows it.
It sounds like you think the president just decides that things should cost more.
Rounds of stimulus checks followed by $1 trillion in infrastructure spending as inflation was rising. Economists were screaming that it was inflationary, but the administration argued that inflation was transitory. Everyone not invested in build back better passing saw this coming and said so at the time
Criminals who stole PPP money aside, people spent that money which improves the economy.
Should we let our infrastructure crumble? When should we pay for it?
Corporate profits at all time highs the past few years - maybe you need to direct some of your anger towards companies taking advantage the opportunity to excuse their price increases.
Biden should run on an 'inflation was necessary' platform. I'm sure it will go great
His "build back better" was so close to "make america great again." Not sure how everyone was ok with that so maybe 'inflation was necessary' would work lol.
Biden's platform is, Make Inflation Great Again (MIGA)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone didn't learn from 2016 polls that polls are not always accurate.
Polls have also shown that the incumbent POTUS can be behind and still win.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/16/us/politics/biden-trump-election-presidents-polling.html
+1
For the incumbent president to lose, you’d need a *major* economic, foreign policy or domestic crisis. And probably a combination of at least two. GDP is strong, the unemployment rate is low and inflation is trending downward. Nobody has to wear masks at the grocery store any more. And say what you will about Ukraine and Israel, but not one American soldier has died in those conflicts. From that vantage point, Biden is going to be very hard to beat.
Have you been living under a rock? We have had this already with Biden’s inflation exploding costs for everything.
Inflation’s going down, my friend. I know that makes you sad but it’s the reality.
Most things cost substantially more today than they did when Biden was inaugurated and wages have not kept pace. You can try to explain it away but anyone who goes grocery shopping knows it.
It sounds like you think the president just decides that things should cost more.
Rounds of stimulus checks followed by $1 trillion in infrastructure spending as inflation was rising. Economists were screaming that it was inflationary, but the administration argued that inflation was transitory. Everyone not invested in build back better passing saw this coming and said so at the time
Criminals who stole PPP money aside, people spent that money which improves the economy.
Should we let our infrastructure crumble? When should we pay for it?
Corporate profits at all time highs the past few years - maybe you need to direct some of your anger towards companies taking advantage the opportunity to excuse their price increases.
Biden should run on an 'inflation was necessary' platform. I'm sure it will go great
His "build back better" was so close to "make america great again." Not sure how everyone was ok with that so maybe 'inflation was necessary' would work lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pp. but I totally agree with you. I don’t know how we’d fix it, but 24 hour news is horrible for humanity.
Yep. Many of us have watched our previously sane parents turn absolutely bat$hit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone didn't learn from 2016 polls that polls are not always accurate.
Polls have also shown that the incumbent POTUS can be behind and still win.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/16/us/politics/biden-trump-election-presidents-polling.html
+1
For the incumbent president to lose, you’d need a *major* economic, foreign policy or domestic crisis. And probably a combination of at least two. GDP is strong, the unemployment rate is low and inflation is trending downward. Nobody has to wear masks at the grocery store any more. And say what you will about Ukraine and Israel, but not one American soldier has died in those conflicts. From that vantage point, Biden is going to be very hard to beat.
Have you been living under a rock? We have had this already with Biden’s inflation exploding costs for everything.
Inflation’s going down, my friend. I know that makes you sad but it’s the reality.
Most things cost substantially more today than they did when Biden was inaugurated and wages have not kept pace. You can try to explain it away but anyone who goes grocery shopping knows it.
It sounds like you think the president just decides that things should cost more.
Rounds of stimulus checks followed by $1 trillion in infrastructure spending as inflation was rising. Economists were screaming that it was inflationary, but the administration argued that inflation was transitory. Everyone not invested in build back better passing saw this coming and said so at the time
Criminals who stole PPP money aside, people spent that money which improves the economy.
Should we let our infrastructure crumble? When should we pay for it?
Corporate profits at all time highs the past few years - maybe you need to direct some of your anger towards companies taking advantage the opportunity to excuse their price increases.
Biden should run on an 'inflation was necessary' platform. I'm sure it will go great
His "build back better" was so close to "make america great again." Not sure how everyone was ok with that so maybe 'inflation was necessary' would work lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone didn't learn from 2016 polls that polls are not always accurate.
Polls have also shown that the incumbent POTUS can be behind and still win.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/16/us/politics/biden-trump-election-presidents-polling.html
+1
For the incumbent president to lose, you’d need a *major* economic, foreign policy or domestic crisis. And probably a combination of at least two. GDP is strong, the unemployment rate is low and inflation is trending downward. Nobody has to wear masks at the grocery store any more. And say what you will about Ukraine and Israel, but not one American soldier has died in those conflicts. From that vantage point, Biden is going to be very hard to beat.
Have you been living under a rock? We have had this already with Biden’s inflation exploding costs for everything.
Inflation’s going down, my friend. I know that makes you sad but it’s the reality.
Most things cost substantially more today than they did when Biden was inaugurated and wages have not kept pace. You can try to explain it away but anyone who goes grocery shopping knows it.
It sounds like you think the president just decides that things should cost more.
Rounds of stimulus checks followed by $1 trillion in infrastructure spending as inflation was rising. Economists were screaming that it was inflationary, but the administration argued that inflation was transitory. Everyone not invested in build back better passing saw this coming and said so at the time
Criminals who stole PPP money aside, people spent that money which improves the economy.
Should we let our infrastructure crumble? When should we pay for it?
Corporate profits at all time highs the past few years - maybe you need to direct some of your anger towards companies taking advantage the opportunity to excuse their price increases.
Biden should run on an 'inflation was necessary' platform. I'm sure it will go great
His "build back better" was so close to "make america great again." Not sure how everyone was ok with that so maybe 'inflation was necessary' would work lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pp. but I totally agree with you. I don’t know how we’d fix it, but 24 hour news is horrible for humanity.
Yep. Many of us have watched our previously sane parents turn absolutely bat$hit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pp. but I totally agree with you. I don’t know how we’d fix it, but 24 hour news is horrible for humanity.
Yep. Many of us have watched our previously sane parents turn absolutely bat$hit.