Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 22:47     Subject: Perry v Segura

Anonymous wrote:As someone who’s know Juan Pablo Segura his whole life we are all crushed. He is one of the best people I know!
Words can’t express how proud you, Juan Pablo, have made us and how you represented yourself, your family, and your beliefs. It took alot of courage to put yourself out there, courage that very few people have. There are even fewer people that can handle such disappointment with dignity and grace. There is immense glory out there for you. Don’t ever forget that! We love you and will support you forever
Love,
Your friends and your community


He may be a nice friend, but he doesn’t speak for the majority of our district. He threw his lot in with the losing side and hitched his wagon to abortion which was a mistake.
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 22:44     Subject: Perry v Segura

As someone who’s know Juan Pablo Segura his whole life we are all crushed. He is one of the best people I know!
Words can’t express how proud you, Juan Pablo, have made us and how you represented yourself, your family, and your beliefs. It took alot of courage to put yourself out there, courage that very few people have. There are even fewer people that can handle such disappointment with dignity and grace. There is immense glory out there for you. Don’t ever forget that! We love you and will support you forever
Love,
Your friends and your community
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 22:34     Subject: Perry v Segura

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Turnout in Loudoun was not that high. I don't know why that particular site has that number. It's 29% here, which seems much more plausible. https://eresultslive.com/Virginia/Loudoun/results/


That one site is off. That's not an accurate number at all.

Women's rights FTW tonight.

+1 We had a 93% voter turnout.

https://enr.elections.virginia.gov/results/public/LOUDOUNCOUNTY/elections/2023-Nov-Gen


No, that’s the site that’s wrong. Please stop promoting it. Voter turnout is never ever that high. 50% would be crazy high. That site is incorrect.
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 22:21     Subject: Perry v Segura

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Turnout in Loudoun was not that high. I don't know why that particular site has that number. It's 29% here, which seems much more plausible. https://eresultslive.com/Virginia/Loudoun/results/


That one site is off. That's not an accurate number at all.

Women's rights FTW tonight.

+1 We had a 93% voter turnout.

https://enr.elections.virginia.gov/results/public/LOUDOUNCOUNTY/elections/2023-Nov-Gen
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 22:16     Subject: Perry v Segura

Anonymous wrote:Turnout in Loudoun was not that high. I don't know why that particular site has that number. It's 29% here, which seems much more plausible. https://eresultslive.com/Virginia/Loudoun/results/


That one site is off. That's not an accurate number at all.

Women's rights FTW tonight.
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 22:00     Subject: Perry v Segura

Perry's going to win 53-47, which I think I predicted a few days ago. It wasn't even close. A big swing and miss for Segura and Youngkin.
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 21:44     Subject: Perry v Segura

Turnout in Loudoun was not that high. I don't know why that particular site has that number. It's 29% here, which seems much more plausible. https://eresultslive.com/Virginia/Loudoun/results/
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 21:30     Subject: Re:Perry v Segura

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Segura is done-zo.

Also waiting to see how quickly he sells or rents out his house.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/samshirazim/status/1722064730812985777?s=20[/twitter][/quote]


Carpetbagging opportunist and fear mongerer who didn't understand his district.

From what I can tell, 99.1% turnout of voters, too.

He was crushed.

Phyllis Randall won handily, too.

Good night for the Ds overall in Loudoun. [/quote]

Wow! 99.1% is Putin in Russia level. [/quote]

Dems know they can count on turnout when the chips are down. 99.1%, 99.9%, 100%, 126%, whatever they need, they’ll have the turnout to put them over the top. They’re unstoppable.
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 21:18     Subject: Re:Perry v Segura

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Segura is done-zo.

Also waiting to see how quickly he sells or rents out his house.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/samshirazim/status/1722064730812985777?s=20[/twitter][/quote]


Carpetbagging opportunist and fear mongerer who didn't understand his district.

From what I can tell, 99.1% turnout of voters, too.

He was crushed.

Phyllis Randall won handily, too.

Good night for the Ds overall in Loudoun. [/quote]

Wow! 99.1% is Putin in Russia level.
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 21:16     Subject: Re:Perry v Segura

Anonymous wrote:Segura is done-zo.

Also waiting to see how quickly he sells or rents out his house.




Carpetbagging opportunist and fear mongerer who didn't understand his district.

From what I can tell, 99.1% turnout of voters, too.

He was crushed.

Phyllis Randall won handily, too.

Good night for the Ds overall in Loudoun.
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 21:08     Subject: Re:Perry v Segura

Segura is done-zo.

Also waiting to see how quickly he sells or rents out his house.

Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 21:07     Subject: Re:Perry v Segura

Anonymous wrote:Countdown till Segura puts his house up for sale...


Buh bye!
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 21:06     Subject: Re:Perry v Segura

Countdown till Segura puts his house up for sale...
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 20:24     Subject: Perry v Segura

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just saw the ridiculous Segura wife ad again. This is her EXACT quote:

“When I had to have an emergency D&C after I had a miscarriage, Juan Pablo supported my decision.”

WTF?


It really is so WTF, and even WTF-er is that paid campaign consultants thought this would make him look good.

I think that ad tanked Segura for any Independent women. Let's see how long before he puts his house up for sale. Bookmarking this thread for when that inevitably happens.


Dems: “Republicans don’t support life of mother abortion exceptions!”
Segura: “I support life of mother abortion exceptions and have a personal story that deeply affected me”
Dems: “you monster!”


Tell me you don’t understand pregnancy without telling me you don’t understand pregnancy.


You mean Segura does want to ban live saving abortion procedures? And his wife didn’t have a D&C after a miscarriage?


You believing Segura when he equates his wife’s miscarriage with terminating a pregnancy.

That “personal story” is completely irrelevant which anyone who is familiar with pregnancy would realize.
Anonymous
Post 11/07/2023 20:20     Subject: Perry v Segura

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just saw the ridiculous Segura wife ad again. This is her EXACT quote:

“When I had to have an emergency D&C after I had a miscarriage, Juan Pablo supported my decision.”

WTF?


It really is so WTF, and even WTF-er is that paid campaign consultants thought this would make him look good.

I think that ad tanked Segura for any Independent women. Let's see how long before he puts his house up for sale. Bookmarking this thread for when that inevitably happens.


Dems: “Republicans don’t support life of mother abortion exceptions!”
Segura: “I support life of mother abortion exceptions and have a personal story that deeply affected me”
Dems: “you monster!”


Are we supposed to applaude him for “allowing” his wife to have an emergency medical procedure?


He didn’t allow it (according to the quote above), he supported it.

You’re just moving the goal posts bc this dude supports abortion restriction exceptions. Sorry you’re about to get a republican representative.


Are you really that stupid? A d&c is not an abortion. Her lump of calls was already dead and her body wasn’t expelling it hence the medical procedure. If he didn’t allow her to get it then she would have gone septic and died. What a f@cking hero.