Anonymous wrote:I think he’s alright. Bad Bunny is such a dumb artist name though.

Dumber than “Sting”, “The Edge “, “Bono” , “Kid Rock” and “Vanilla Ice” — or just about the same amount of dumb?
I actually like the name Bad Bunny — now that I’ve heard the story behind it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me like I’m 5?

The ... "lure?"

Do you mean to say the "appeal?"

OP is mixing up "allure" and "lure." Apparently a person not particularly proficient in English, wants us to explain the appeal of someone who sings in Spanish.

Maybe they meant what they said. As in what’s his hook?

Or what kind of mojo/bait is he using to hook so many people. Why are people hooked on him rather than some other artist.

What kind of fancy shinny lure is he using to pull in so many fans.

Language is fun. Inferential leaps keep things interesting. Pedants, yawn, not so much.

I think he’s alright. Bad Bunny is such a dumb artist name though.

Anonymous wrote:He lures you, today's Pied Piper!

Why is it that the OP’s with the worst grammar have their threads live on DCUM forever?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad Bunny lost more [percentage] of the Super Bowl viewership from the end of the second quarter than has ever happened before.—Nielsen ratings

Not quite. Super Bowl LX draws an average 124.9 million viewers, Bad Bunny 128.2 million.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7036613/2026/02/10/super-bowl-ratings-nfl-nbc-bad-bunny/

+1. People have had differing opinions on music since the dawn of time, but Bad Bunny by any metric is an incredibly popular artist.

Industry plant , autotun