Anonymous wrote:When people say things fall apart toward the middle or tail end of elementary,,, when people say they regret not going private… are you also including wealthy coveted districts like McLean, North Arlington, Potomac, etc with very few FARMS and non-English speaking kids and I assume lots of entitled kids and parents who outside outside enrichment?
Or are you talking about HOCO, MOCO, non-Langley FCPS, and other “normal districts” that are still well off?
Anonymous wrote:Great scape goat. The pandemic is the reason for all America's problems. Everyone look away from the billionaires who benefitted from the pandemic and off of workers impoverished and uninsured butts.
Anonymous wrote:When people say things fall apart toward the middle or tail end of elementary,,, when people say they regret not going private… are you also including wealthy coveted districts like McLean, North Arlington, Potomac, etc with very few FARMS and non-English speaking kids and I assume lots of entitled kids and parents who outside outside enrichment?
Or are you talking about HOCO, MOCO, non-Langley FCPS, and other “normal districts” that are still well off?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I had it to over again, I would absolutely send my children to private school. They are in HS now so the ship has sailed, but I am saving up knowing I may want to help my grandchildren attend private. It’s sad, but this is the result of IDEA done amok and parenting responsibility gone out the window. I regret that I didn’t pull the trigger in late elementary when I first started to realize it. Hope springs eternal I guess.
I agree that things fall apart in late elementary. I’m in a district that ends elementary at 5th grade, and my DC’s public elementary is very esteemed. The kids who have issues - parental, emotional, behavioral, educational, IEP or no IEP - have gotten worse and more numerous, and since the kids are getting bigger, some have phones, some are more independent in terms of getting to school and back home, some are entering puberty and so forth, parents are stepping back so any extant problems are just what they are. Parents do not have the social expectation of reaching out to other parents to help resolve things - a little (every bad word that has ever existed) kid who has used every insult and threat imaginable is now totally free to do what he’s always done since K as a 5th grader, and his parents have totally given up on even the minor courtesies like apologizing to the family after their kid threatened to murder another and set the victim on fire, or tripping and beating another kid. These parents seem to think it’s only on the school to deal with this stuff by late elementary. It’s a different world from my own childhood.
Anonymous wrote:If I had it to over again, I would absolutely send my children to private school. They are in HS now so the ship has sailed, but I am saving up knowing I may want to help my grandchildren attend private. It’s sad, but this is the result of IDEA done amok and parenting responsibility gone out the window. I regret that I didn’t pull the trigger in late elementary when I first started to realize it. Hope springs eternal I guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Put the disruptive kids in virtual public school and let the well behaved kids meet in person. Would cost virtually nothing and solve everything.
As long as you don't care about the kids, their families, or the impact to society when those kids get older.
Why are the parents not responsible here?
We could say the same thing about you. Pull your own kids out if you don't like inclusive public schools. NT kids are going to be much easier to homeschool or virtual school effectively than those with special needs.
Yeah, no. But keep it up with the attitude. The tides of public opinion are changing, and the laws, and, more importantly, judicial interpretations of the existing laws, will follow suit. Count on it.
DP
There's no evidence that there's broad support to segregate kids with special needs. If it had mainstream support, someone would be willing to openly advocate for it.
People might secretly like all kinds of discriminatory practices, but the inevitable backlash stops almost all of them from going anywhere as a matter of public policy. Democrats aren't going throw kids with special needs to the wolves, and Trumpers don't particularly care about this issue except to the extent they can use it to push for private school vouchers.
Shame on you for using the word segregate. Different kids have different needs.
Then you're going to have to convince people that separate can be equal, despite history to the contrary.
Proposing to prevent kids with special needs from going to school isn't going to help your case for that.
When these laws were created, people were thinking about dyslexia and kids in wheelchairs. They weren’t thinking about integrating kids who disrupt learning for all the other kids and give them PTSD from enduring classes with them every day. The laws need to be clarified. What people call a “disability” these days simply isn’t what people had in mind when they supported these laws. They would never have passed in this format if people knew that kids would be screaming in class and throwing chairs and there’d be literally nothing that anyone could do about it.