Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would they mail 5 separate checks, totalling the wrong amount...I have so many questions.
Why? Because they suck and hate families and children.
I worked in finance for a school district years ago. The ONLY even semi plausible explanation for multiple checks in incorrect amounts is that they have somehow divided up the reimbursement work by date, and not by student. So person A is handling all reimbursements for 2020, person B for 2021, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its interesting to me that out of our completely random population of parents on here, almost everyone was sent an incorrect, reduced amount AND almost everyone had to submit their receipts multiple times. Assuming everyone is sending things in electronically, that makes no sense. How do electronic submissions get "lost"? Where does it cross over from incompetence to maliciousness?
Hahaha, i asked the very same question----how does an email with receipts atttached get "lost"---when they asked me to resend *to the same email address*.
No one ever answered my question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would they mail 5 separate checks, totalling the wrong amount...I have so many questions.
Why? Because they suck and hate families and children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I found this online.
What was interesting to me was that the amount was so high (I am in two different special ed parents group--my kid is 18 and has cycled through a lot of schools--and no one who was getting financial reimbursement was getting anywhere near this much and one of the groups is parents of very, very impaired dc).
Almost always these findings go in favor of the school system. Its really unusual for FCPS to lose like this! I can't overstate how unusual this ruling is.
I haven't heard of any other parens being asked to sign a Non Disclosure Agreement-this was really strange to me.
My kid has had an IEP since age 3 and is severely disabled. I would say 90% of her teachers have been wonderful people trying to do impossible jobs usually with little support. We have dealt with Gatehouse staff many times on many different issues and they are 100% of the time, unbelievably slow and frankly incompetent. I don't know where they find these people.
https://specialeducationaction.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2024.02.26-VDOE-LOF_Redacted.pdf
+100 million.
Anonymous wrote:Why would they mail 5 separate checks, totalling the wrong amount...I have so many questions.
Anonymous wrote:I found this online.
What was interesting to me was that the amount was so high (I am in two different special ed parents group--my kid is 18 and has cycled through a lot of schools--and no one who was getting financial reimbursement was getting anywhere near this much and one of the groups is parents of very, very impaired dc).
Almost always these findings go in favor of the school system. Its really unusual for FCPS to lose like this! I can't overstate how unusual this ruling is.
I haven't heard of any other parens being asked to sign a Non Disclosure Agreement-this was really strange to me.
My kid has had an IEP since age 3 and is severely disabled. I would say 90% of her teachers have been wonderful people trying to do impossible jobs usually with little support. We have dealt with Gatehouse staff many times on many different issues and they are 100% of the time, unbelievably slow and frankly incompetent. I don't know where they find these people.
https://specialeducationaction.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2024.02.26-VDOE-LOF_Redacted.pdf
Anonymous wrote:It’s definitely not malice or intentional, sure it’s fun to make it seem like everything is some John Grisham-esque deep conspiracy, but the truth is those who do this work A). have no personal stake in it (what do they care if a check says $50 or $500) B). are definitely not compensated well enough to participate in something like that C). are aware everything they write is FOIA-able, and last but not least, D). are in some cases FCPS parents of Special Education students themselves.
I always crack up at these threads that paint county employees as some nefarious childless beings imported from a foreign place, as if they aren’t also sending their kids through FCPS.
It’s crazy in this area, of all areas, that people don’t recognize that a large bureaucracy is just naturally prone to large oversights where different departments just pass the buck going “that’s not our responsibility”.
As far as I can tell the positions tasked with being compliant to this ruling didn’t really exist prior to the ruling itself. The few contacts they had provided early on seemed to turnover pretty quickly (not a shocker the position probably sucks).
There’s very obviously a lot of potential cracks for things to slip through in how this is as run. I can assure you, the county that had to do this because a lawsuit didn’t just turn back around and go “okay, how do we defraud s as ll those eligible” and get a litany of underpaid public servants to jump aboard.
Anonymous wrote:Its interesting to me that out of our completely random population of parents on here, almost everyone was sent an incorrect, reduced amount AND almost everyone had to submit their receipts multiple times. Assuming everyone is sending things in electronically, that makes no sense. How do electronic submissions get "lost"? Where does it cross over from incompetence to maliciousness?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I found this online.
What was interesting to me was that the amount was so high (I am in two different special ed parents group--my kid is 18 and has cycled through a lot of schools--and no one who was getting financial reimbursement was getting anywhere near this much and one of the groups is parents of very, very impaired dc).
Almost always these findings go in favor of the school system. Its really unusual for FCPS to lose like this! I can't overstate how unusual this ruling is.
I haven't heard of any other parens being asked to sign a Non Disclosure Agreement-this was really strange to me.
My kid has had an IEP since age 3 and is severely disabled. I would say 90% of her teachers have been wonderful people trying to do impossible jobs usually with little support. We have dealt with Gatehouse staff many times on many different issues and they are 100% of the time, unbelievably slow and frankly incompetent. I don't know where they find these people.
https://specialeducationaction.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2024.02.26-VDOE-LOF_Redacted.pdf
So October 2023---> January 2024 was illegally slow response rate by FCPS. But parents on here are just getting reimbursed based on meetings held in spring of 2023?
That's crazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its interesting to me that out of our completely random population of parents on here, almost everyone was sent an incorrect, reduced amount AND almost everyone had to submit their receipts multiple times. Assuming everyone is sending things in electronically, that makes no sense. How do electronic submissions get "lost"? Where does it cross over from incompetence to maliciousness?
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."