Anonymous wrote:The person who is so happy when beautiful young (celebrity) couples get married and immediately have babies or might immediately have babies because they make such a beautiful family.
The person who hates “strivers.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anybody mentioned the pair of atheists who hate it when anybody talks about Christianity, and really, really hate it when somebody talks about Catholicism? They plus one each others' unoriginal insults, it's almost tragic.
You. The endlessly perseverative conservative Christian with the faux persecution complex who never, ever shuts up about the supposed “pair of atheists,” and who refuses to move on to a site where they actually have a forum specifically for Christians to discuss among themselves, because then you’d lose your opportunity to play the victim.
-not an atheist, Episcopalian
Newsflash: I’m Episcopalian too, and this is the very first time I’ve pointed out the pair of atheist haters. Although there’s someone else who does that and they may be conservative, but I don’t know that.
Tell me you’re OK with this pair that derails so many threads with, let’s call it what it is, bigotry, and who start so many hateful threads?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anybody mentioned the pair of atheists who hate it when anybody talks about Christianity, and really, really hate it when somebody talks about Catholicism? They plus one each others' unoriginal insults, it's almost tragic.
You. The endlessly perseverative conservative Christian with the faux persecution complex who never, ever shuts up about the supposed “pair of atheists,” and who refuses to move on to a site where they actually have a forum specifically for Christians to discuss among themselves, because then you’d lose your opportunity to play the victim.
-not an atheist, Episcopalian
Anonymous wrote:The person who is so happy when beautiful young (celebrity) couples get married and immediately have babies or might immediately have babies because they make such a beautiful family.
The person who hates “strivers.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are:
-Brunch granny
-Oxford DPhil parent in the college forum
-Poster who has multiple full-time jobs (J1, J2, J3) at once in the jobs forum
-Poster who keeps saying the US is becoming “like Brazil”
Any others?
The bolded drives me crazy. So annoying.
They always misspell words in British uni terminology (like “Michaelmas”) and get corrected but they continue to
It is spelled Michaelmas. It’s the fall term at a number of British universities
Anonymous wrote:Has anybody mentioned the pair of atheists who hate it when anybody talks about Christianity, and really, really hate it when somebody talks about Catholicism? They plus one each others' unoriginal insults, it's almost tragic.
Anonymous wrote:Trope lady
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The (I presume) guys who engage in pointless fundamentalist Christian vs. atheist debates in the religion forum. I imagine them chortling, "Ha HA! What about THIS!" as they consult their book of logical fallacies and throw around Latin terms they don't understand, all to go around in pointless circles. They should just accept that they are yin to the other's yang.
Why do you presume “guys”?
Not PP but men usually identify themselves as such. They get more respect in the responses by doing that
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are:
-Brunch granny
-Oxford DPhil parent in the college forum
-Poster who has multiple full-time jobs (J1, J2, J3) at once in the jobs forum
-Poster who keeps saying the US is becoming “like Brazil”
Any others?
The bolded drives me crazy. So annoying.
They always misspell words in British uni terminology (like “Michaelmas”) and get corrected but they continue to
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The (I presume) guys who engage in pointless fundamentalist Christian vs. atheist debates in the religion forum. I imagine them chortling, "Ha HA! What about THIS!" as they consult their book of logical fallacies and throw around Latin terms they don't understand, all to go around in pointless circles. They should just accept that they are yin to the other's yang.
Why do you presume “guys”?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The College Forum ratings lists person.
+10000000000