Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This economy is so robust that banks cannot keep up. They are roadkill !!!
Inflation reduction act and Biden’s investment in all aspects of infrastructure will power us through this century.
Ignore fat cat banker issues.
I hope this is sarcasm.
Not sarcastic at all. Biden is building up from the bottom. The top will take care of itself. These rich vc’s should buy the bank.
It is Biden's spending that got us where we are.
I’ve seen a bunch of dumb takes on this, but this wins the award for dumbest so far.
DP. But PP is correct. Though I’d edit it to say trump and Biden spending is why we’re here.
Print trillions of dollars, causes inflation. So the fed had to pivot and raise interest rates to lower rates. SVB didn’t foresee interest rates hikes and it was too little, too late.
But why did they make a different calculation from other banks? The other banks are that much smarter?
Anonymous wrote:Serious question … how does this affect most Americans, not your DCUM types? Will they realize that anything happened?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This economy is so robust that banks cannot keep up. They are roadkill !!!
Inflation reduction act and Biden’s investment in all aspects of infrastructure will power us through this century.
Ignore fat cat banker issues.
I hope this is sarcasm.
Not sarcastic at all. Biden is building up from the bottom. The top will take care of itself. These rich vc’s should buy the bank.
It is Biden's spending that got us where we are.
I’ve seen a bunch of dumb takes on this, but this wins the award for dumbest so far.
DP. But PP is correct. Though I’d edit it to say trump and Biden spending is why we’re here.
Print trillions of dollars, causes inflation. So the fed had to pivot and raise interest rates to lower rates. SVB didn’t foresee interest rates hikes and it was too little, too late.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question … how does this affect most Americans, not your DCUM types? Will they realize that anything happened?
They have no idea how close they were to being unemployed. Blissfully unaware. And the Democrats will lose the messaging war again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So there are all of these libertarians etc calling on the Fed/FDIC to basically take over and secure the bank.
Keep in mind, this i only happening because Trump totally gutted regulations that would have prevented this from happening. So we are going to get a massive bailout for Silicon Valley Bank and yet people complain about a few thousand dollars in bailouts for student loans.
For one, the FDIC already took over the bank around 24 hours ago
Two, this is not caused by Trump gutting regulations. The cause was interest rate risk- recall people deposit money at banks and they turn around and lend money, in this case in the form of MBS and treasuries. The fed kept interest rates too low for too long and then they hiked rates precipitously, which caused huge losses for the bank on those securities that were purchased when interest rates were much lower
Disagree. Trump gutted Dodd-Frank that would have protected against this.
Dodd-Frank redefined the DEPOSITOR as an unsecured creditor by lawful authority. Bank deposits therefore become the property of the bank and your deposits represent a liability to the bank. Got it? As an unsecured creditor, you stand second-in-line for those funds and the bank's primary creditors get first dibs. Remember the haircuts people in Cyprus and Argentina took?
I swear, you'll throw out any term because you don't want to take the time to understand things.
You're like a parakeet yelling Trump GOP Trump GOP.
The U.S.practices depositor preference.
Anonymous wrote:How many bank failures under the other guy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many bank failures under the other guy?
16
https://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/bank/
You see the second row that states total assets?
PP asked a question and got a factual answer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many bank failures under the other guy?
16
https://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/bank/
You see the second row that states total assets?
Anonymous wrote:How many bank failures under the other guy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many bank failures under the other guy?
16
https://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/bank/
Anonymous wrote:How many bank failures under the other guy?
Anonymous wrote:How many bank failures under the other guy?