Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the obsession with huge houses 3 miles away from everything. Why not access to parks, trails, restaurants, schools, grocery stores, socializing in coffee shops, biking etc?
The American obsession with SFH is unsustainable environmental, financially (impossible to maintain long exburban roads) and mentally
Ok, suburbanite here. Within 2 miles (in some cases just blocks away) there a highly rated walkable public elementary, coffee and bagel place, parks and playgrounds, bike and walking paths, a major hospital, 50+ places to eat, drink, shop, and socialize. Walk. Bike. Bus. Cars in my garage. All options on the table. I won't go into all the downsides of urban living. The news and social media public safety feeds offer and endless supply.
+1
I’m in Brambleton (Ashburn) and everything you mentioned is within steps of my house. I literally went weeks without stepping foot in my car. These city people are laughable thinking that EVERYTHING we need in the burbs is like a 10 mile drive to anywhere.
Why are city people so focused on us anyway? We don’t care how you live in the city. As someone who lived in NOMA a few years ago, I honestly don’t feel like I’m missing much out here in the burbs. The only thing I miss is not being able to go to a NBA/NHL game as easy anymore.
I have lived in DC for decades and have never ever been to Brambleton. Enough said
Ok…lol. Cool story.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For whatever reason, folks in Singapore, London, Hong Kong don’t seem to have these hang-ups about “the neighbors,” “living on top of one another” or “sharing walls”
Sounds like you’d fit in better there. Enjoy Singapore!
Anonymous wrote:DC is perfect example where the city could impose a EZ-Pass toll, lets say $10 for every entry in a private car. This would increase use of public transportation and make it more desirable to live within the city limits. This would again lead to a higher tax base and better schools and services. Just look at the city of Oslo Norway as an example.
Anonymous wrote:This whole topic is mostly driven by cost of energy... If we would tax energy (gas, electricity, transportation etc) all the rich people would move into ubran areas and the less fortunate would migrate to suburbia.
DC is perfect example where the city could impose a EZ-Pass toll, lets say $10 for every entry in a private car. This would increase use of public transportation and make it more desirable to live within the city limits. This would again lead to a higher tax base and better schools and services. Just look at the city of Oslo Norway as an example.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the obsession with huge houses 3 miles away from everything. Why not access to parks, trails, restaurants, schools, grocery stores, socializing in coffee shops, biking etc?
The American obsession with SFH is unsustainable environmental, financially (impossible to maintain long exburban roads) and mentally
Ok, suburbanite here. Within 2 miles (in some cases just blocks away) there a highly rated walkable public elementary, coffee and bagel place, parks and playgrounds, bike and walking paths, a major hospital, 50+ places to eat, drink, shop, and socialize. Walk. Bike. Bus. Cars in my garage. All options on the table. I won't go into all the downsides of urban living. The news and social media public safety feeds offer and endless supply.
+1
I’m in Brambleton (Ashburn) and everything you mentioned is within steps of my house. I literally went weeks without stepping foot in my car. These city people are laughable thinking that EVERYTHING we need in the burbs is like a 10 mile drive to anywhere.
Why are city people so focused on us anyway? We don’t care how you live in the city. As someone who lived in NOMA a few years ago, I honestly don’t feel like I’m missing much out here in the burbs. The only thing I miss is not being able to go to a NBA/NHL game as easy anymore.
I have lived in DC for decades and have never ever been to Brambleton. Enough said
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the obsession with huge houses 3 miles away from everything. Why not access to parks, trails, restaurants, schools, grocery stores, socializing in coffee shops, biking etc?
The American obsession with SFH is unsustainable environmental, financially (impossible to maintain long exburban roads) and mentally
We do embrace it, and that's why its so expensive to live in urban cores.
Anonymous wrote:For whatever reason, folks in Singapore, London, Hong Kong don’t seem to have these hang-ups about “the neighbors,” “living on top of one another” or “sharing walls”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the obsession with huge houses 3 miles away from everything. Why not access to parks, trails, restaurants, schools, grocery stores, socializing in coffee shops, biking etc?
The American obsession with SFH is unsustainable environmental, financially (impossible to maintain long exburban roads) and mentally
Ok, suburbanite here. Within 2 miles (in some cases just blocks away) there a highly rated walkable public elementary, coffee and bagel place, parks and playgrounds, bike and walking paths, a major hospital, 50+ places to eat, drink, shop, and socialize. Walk. Bike. Bus. Cars in my garage. All options on the table. I won't go into all the downsides of urban living. The news and social media public safety feeds offer and endless supply.
+1
I’m in Brambleton (Ashburn) and everything you mentioned is within steps of my house. I literally went weeks without stepping foot in my car. These city people are laughable thinking that EVERYTHING we need in the burbs is like a 10 mile drive to anywhere.
Why are city people so focused on us anyway? We don’t care how you live in the city. As someone who lived in NOMA a few years ago, I honestly don’t feel like I’m missing much out here in the burbs. The only thing I miss is not being able to go to a NBA/NHL game as easy anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For whatever reason, folks in Singapore, London, Hong Kong don’t seem to have these hang-ups about “the neighbors,” “living on top of one another” or “sharing walls”
London is very distinctly zoned, good vs bad neighborhoods. People are ok to live in good ones. US cities aren’t as distinctly zoned generally (with a few exceptions) because “good” neighborhoods are really the ‘burbs.
In Singapore I bet homeless are not allowed to loiter in public spaces
It’s just all very different